Skip to main content
Download PDF

Subcellular organization of UBE3A in human cerebral cortex

Molecular Autism volume 9, Article number: 54 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Loss of UBE3A causes Angelman syndrome, whereas excess UBE3A activity appears to increase the risk for autism. Despite this powerful association with neurodevelopmental disorders, there is still much to be learned about UBE3A, including its cellular and subcellular organization in the human brain. The issue is important, since UBE3A’s localization is integral to its function.

Methods

We used light and electron microscopic immunohistochemistry to study the cellular and subcellular distribution of UBE3A in the adult human cerebral cortex. Experiments were performed on multiple tissue sources, but our results focused on optimally preserved material, using surgically resected human temporal cortex of high ultrastructural quality from nine individuals.

Results

We demonstrate that UBE3A is expressed in both glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons, and to a lesser extent in glial cells. We find that UBE3A in neurons has a non-uniform subcellular distribution. In somata, UBE3A preferentially concentrates in euchromatin-rich domains within the nucleus. Electron microscopy reveals that labeling concentrates in the head and neck of dendritic spines and is excluded from the PSD. Strongest labeling within the neuropil was found in axon terminals.

Conclusions

By highlighting the subcellular compartments in which UBE3A is likely to function in the human neocortex, our data provide insight into the diverse functional capacities of this E3 ligase. These anatomical data may help to elucidate the role of UBE3A in Angelman syndrome and autism spectrum disorder.

Background

Protein degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP) is important for a wide range of functions in the nervous system [1, 2]. In UPP processing, the protein substrate is marked by covalent attachment of the small protein ubiquitin for subsequent degradation by the proteasome, a specialized proteolytic complex. The process starts with the activation of ubiquitin by E1 ubiquitin ligase enzymes [3, 4]. E2 enzymes then transfer the activated ubiquitin to E3 ubiquitin ligases, which attach the ubiquitin to the substrate. The E3 ligases determine the substrate specificity of ubiquitination.

Two major classes of E3s have been defined: HECT (homologous to E6-AP carboxyl-terminus) domain E3s and RING finger E3s. UBE3A, the first E3 discovered in the HECT class [5], is of special interest, because failure to maintain appropriate levels of UBE3A in the brain is directly linked to severe clinical disorders. The loss of UBE3A function causes Angelman syndrome (AS) [6, 7], characterized by profound intellectual and developmental disabilities [8]. On the other hand, increased UBE3A activity (via gene duplication or gain-of-function mutation) is implicated in several forms of autism [9,10,11,12,13,14,15], implying that UBE3A must be expressed at precise levels to allow proper neuronal function.

Despite its clinical importance, our current understanding of UBE3A’s function in the brain remains limited. UBE3A has been implicated in regulation of Golgi acidification [16] and mitochondrial function [17,18,19], as well as synaptic transmission and plasticity [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Several potential interactors and substrates for its ubiquitin ligase activity have been identified, including the RhoA guanine nucleotide exchange factors Pbl/ECT2 and Ephexin5 [24, 27, 28], RAD23A, (an enzyme involved in excision repair of damaged DNA [29]), and the estrogen receptor [30]. UBE3A has also been shown to regulate the levels of Cbln1 in excitatory neurons, which in turn can influence sociability [26]. Finally, UBE3A can interact directly with the proteasome to influence its degradative activity [15, 31,32,33,34,35], suggesting potentially wide-ranging roles for UBE3A in cellular functions that remain to be fully defined.

Crucial for the elucidation of UBE3A’s functions is to determine where the protein actually lies within the cell. Previous immunohistochemical studies in rodents found a broad distribution of UBE3A, but emphasized its nuclear expression in mature neurons, consistent with a proposed role for UBE3A in the regulation of transcription [26, 36,37,38]. However, patterns of UBE3A expression in humans may not be fully conserved, considering the 100 million years of divergent evolution between rodents and primates. Unique patterns of UBE3A expression within the cerebral cortex could have important functional implications, especially given the cognitive manifestations of both AS and autism. Here, we explore this intriguing possibility by investigating the subcellular distribution of UBE3A in the human temporal cortex.

Methods

Human brain tissue

All procedures regarding human tissue were performed with the approval of the UCSF Committee on Human Research and the University of Maryland Institutional Review Board. Nine small blocks from postmortem temporal cortex were obtained from the UCSF Neurodegenerative Disease Brain Bank (NDBB) and the NIH NeuroBioBank, including autopsy materials from all three adults with AS currently available for study. Details are listed in Table 1. Interpretability of immunohistochemical results depends on the quality of the tissue. To assess structural preservation, we used transmission electron microscopy of fixed samples embedded in epoxy plastic.

Table 1 Autopsy cases included in this study
Full size table

The ultrastructural integrity of all postmortem tissue was seriously compromised. In the best preserved samples, most subcellular structures were identifiable, but the tissue contained abnormal holes, neurons were vesiculated, cytoplasm was disrupted, nucleoplasm appeared abnormally condensed, membranes were distorted, and mitochondria were swollen (Fig. 1a, b). The overall impression was of substantial deterioration of the material surrounding a “skeleton” of residual organization. Notwithstanding the suboptimal integrity of this material, it was far superior to that of the available postmortem samples from persons with AS (Fig. 1c, d). This material was markedly degraded, with severe disruption and a global lack of ultrastructural integrity. A few elements remained identifiable, including many synapses, but these resembled biochemically isolated preparations; synaptic membranes and synaptic vesicles were typically lost or distorted. We concluded that despite their inherent clinical importance, the available AS samples were unsuitable for micro-anatomical study, while autopsy material from neurotypical controls was acceptable for specific purposes if results were interpreted with caution. Unexpectedly, the structural preservation and RIN score (RNA integrity number) were not always correlated (Table 1), further emphasizing the value of ultrastructural assessment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Ultrastructural integrity of human tissue samples from different sources. Ultrastructural integrity is low in postmortem material from a control donor, though major organelles such as nuclei (N) remain identifiable (low-magnification view, a). At high magnification, synapses (arrowhead) are damaged but clearly defined (b). Material from an Angelman syndrome donor is virtually uninterpretable (reflecting the practical difficulty of obtaining and curating such material), though damaged mitochondria and traces of nuclear structure remain (N in panel c); hints of synaptic specializations may be identified even in this material (arrowhead, d). In contrast, tissue from biopsy specimens obtained during surgeries for epilepsy shows very good preservation, as documented by features including intact mitochondria, well-aligned rough endoplasmic reticulum, and intact chromatin (e). The well-preserved neuropil (f) contrasts with that of the autopsy specimens above. Tissue from case no. 5758 for a and b, 1494 for c and d, and Q1012 for e and f. Scale bar = 1 μm in a, c, and e and 500 nm in b, d, and f

Full size image

Choosing to focus on well preserved material, we obtained 9 surgical biopsies. Because of limited tissue availability, all nine were from patients undergoing surgery to remove epileptic foci in the hippocampus (Table 2). The temporal cortex from these patients was intact, displaying normal activity in intraoperative electrocorticography, and removed only to gain access to the pathological hippocampal tissue beneath it. Small pieces of the neocortex overlying the epileptic focus were immersion-fixed for 24 h at 4 °C in 1–4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/1% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer (PB), 2% PFA/2–4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate + 0.1% CaCl2 and 2.5% DMSO, or 4% PFA in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate + 0.1% CaCl2 and 2.5% DMSO. Following fixation, the samples were stored in PO4-buffered saline (PBS) at 4 °C. Sections were cut at 50 μm on a Vibratome and collected in cold PB.

Table 2 Biopsy cases included in this study
Full size table

In contrast to the postmortem tissue, the ultrastructural integrity of the biopsy samples was generally good, and in many cases, comparable to that obtained from perfusion-fixed mice (Fig. 1e, f). Since the biopsies were from patients undergoing surgery to remove epileptic foci, we took the added precaution of staining each sample for parvalbumin, GABA, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), three markers which may undergo pathological changes in epileptic tissues; we restricted our analysis to regions from each biopsy that appeared normal, as assessed by comparison with immunostaining in perfusion-fixed rodents.

Animals

All procedures related to the care and treatment of animals were in accordance with institutional and NIH guidelines, and all animal use protocols were reviewed and approved by the UNC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. AS model mice (Ube3am−/p+), which maternally inherit the Ube3a knock-out allele, were generated by mating wild-type (Ube3am+/p+) male mice to female mice with paternal inheritance of the Ube3a knock-out allele (Ube3am+/p–), which themselves are phenotypically normal [39, 40]. After inducing deep anesthesia with sodium pentobarbital (80 mg/kg, i.p.), adult (P60–P100) male mice were intracardially perfused with 50 ml of 4% freshly depolymerized paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (PB, 0.1 M, pH 7.4), then post-fixed overnight at 4 °C in the same buffer. To mimic the biopsy procedure in human patients, we anesthetized mice with pentobarbital (80 mg/kg) and quickly removed the brain. One hemisphere was immediately submerged in fixative, while the other half was exposed to room air for 15 min prior to immersion in fixative. After 24 h in the fixative, the brains were rinsed in PB, sectioned at 50 or 100 μm on a Vibratome, and collected in cold PB.

Antibodies

To identify UBE3A, we used a mouse monoclonal antibody (3E5, Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. SAB1404508, RRID:AB_10740376) raised against a peptide corresponding to mouse UBE3A isoforms 1 and 3 (a.a. 315–415) and isoform 2 (a.a. 336–436). Importantly, this immunogen shares 100% sequence identity with human UBE3A isoforms 1 (a.a. 318–417), 2 (a.a. 341–441), and 3 (a.a. 338–437). We used this antibody because we had previously verified its specificity against AS model and UBE3A KO mice [41].

To identify GABA, we used a rabbit polyclonal antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; A2052, lot 052K4827) developed using GABA-BSA as the immunogen. The antibody was affinity-purified using the immunogen. It showed positive binding with GABA and GABA-KLH in a dot blot assay and negative binding with bovine serum albumin (BSA) (manufacturer’s technical information).

To identify GFAP, we used a rabbit polyclonal anti-GFAP (Chemicon, AB5804) developed against purified bovine GFAP. This antibody recognizes a 51 kDa band on immunoblot of rat spinal cord.

To identify Oligodendrocyte Transcription Factor 2 (Olig2), we used a rabbit polyclonal anti-Olig2 (Millipore, AB9610) developed using a recombinant mouse Olig-2. This antibody specifically labels cells of oligodendrocyte lineage [42], consistent with our own observations [43].

Light microscopy

Free-floating sections were treated for 30 min in 1% sodium borohydride, followed by 30 min with 3% H2O2 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 0.1 M, pH 7.4). After preincubation in 10% normal donkey serum (to block secondary antibody binding sites), sections were incubated in UBE3A (1:500 to 1:5000) overnight on a shaker at room temperature.

For immunoperoxidase microscopy, sections were then incubated overnight on a shaker at room temperature in biotinylated secondary antibody (1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and for 4 h in ExtrAvidin-peroxidase complex (1:5000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO); peroxidase was histochemically visualized with diaminobenzidine. Processed sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides, air dried, and cleared with xylene before being coverslipped with D.P.X. Mountant (BDH Chemicals, Poole, England).

For immunofluorescence, antigenic sites were visualized with donkey IgG conjugated to DyLight 549 (1:200, Jackson ImmunoResearch; West Grove, PA). For double labeling, the second primary antibody (1:10,000 GABA, 1:1000 Olig2, or 1:2000 GFAP) was applied overnight and visualized by a secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa 488 (1:200, Invitrogen). Some sections were then counterstained with DAPI (1:10,000, Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. D9542) to visualize nuclei, and with NeuroTrace 640–660 (1:1000, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL; cat. no. N21483) to visualize neuronal somata. Sections were examined with a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope with Airyscan.

Electron microscopy

To assess structural preservation, sections were processed for reduced osmium according to the Knott protocol [44, 45]. Briefly, sections were washed in cacodylate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) and post-fixed for 40 min in 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide and 1% osmium tetroxide, followed by 1 h in 1% osmium tetroxide alone, rinsed in water, then incubated 40 min in 1% uranyl acetate in water, rinsed in water, dehydrated in an ethanol series, and infiltrated and embedded in resin (Spurr’s low viscosity epoxy with ERL-4221, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA; cat. no. 14300).

For immunohistochemistry, sections were treated with 1% sodium borohydride/PBS, followed by 3% H2O2/PBS, then 0.025% Triton X-100/PBS, then blocked with 10% normal goat serum (NGS), and incubated overnight in primary antibody (UBE3A, 1:200 to 1:1000). Sections were rinsed, and blocked again in 2% NGS, then incubated overnight with biotinylated goat-anti mouse IgG (1:2000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA; cat. no. BA-9200), rinsed, and incubated for 2 h in 1.4 nm gold particles conjugated to streptavidin (1:100; Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY; cat. no. 2016). After rinsing, binding was stabilized by treating 30 min in 2% glutaraldehyde/PBS; sections were washed again and transitioned into 0.05 M sodium acetate (to remove phosphate and chloride ions), followed by silver enhancement with HQ Silver (Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY; cat. no. 2012). After rinsing in sodium acetate and transitioning to PB, sections were post-fixed in 0.5% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PB for 45 min, rinsed and transitioned to 0.1 M maleate buffer, pH 6, and then incubated for 45 min with 1% uranyl acetate in maleate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.0).

After processing, sections were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and infiltrated with a low viscosity epoxy resin (Spurr’s with ERL-4221, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) and flat-mounted between sheets of ACLAR® fluoropolymer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA; cat. no. 50425) within glass slides. Sixty-nanometer sections were cut and mounted on 200 mesh copper grids. For double labeling with GABA, nickel grids were pretreated 15 min at 60 °C in 0.01 M citrate buffer, pH 6, rinsed in water, blocked in 1% BSA in Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.6, with 0.005% Tergitol NP-10, and incubated overnight at 21–24 °C room temperature with the primary antibody (GABA, 1:10,000 to 1:50,000). Grids were rinsed, blocked in 1% normal goat serum in TBS, pH 8.2, with Tergitol NP-10, and incubated in secondary antibodies for 2 h (goat antibody to rabbit IgG conjugated to 20 nm gold particles, BBI, UK, cat. no. EM.GAR20). Grids were then rinsed in buffer, then water, and counterstained with 1% uranyl acetate in water, followed by Sato’s lead. Electron microscopy was performed with a Philips Tecnai transmission electron microscope.

Controls

Biopsy specimens are subject to an unavoidable delay (for our material, 5–15 min, Table 2) prior to immersion in the fixative. Delayed fixation could in principle lead to misleading artifacts in immunolocalization, particularly for a protein involved in proteasomal degradation like UBE3A. Accordingly, we verified that similarly delayed immersion fixation in mice does not significantly affect UBE3A distribution or cause other unforeseen issues. We compared the overall distribution of UBE3A in mouse brains fixed by perfusion, immediate immersion fixation, and immersion fixation after a delay of 15 min (Fig. 2). We found that UBE3A staining was similar in all three cases: it was expressed throughout all layers of the neocortex, with strong nuclear staining and weaker staining in somata and dendrites. Vascular artifacts and subtle indications of cytoplasmic condensation after delayed fixation did not significantly affect the pattern of immunostaining.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Immunohistochemistry for UBE3A in mouse cerebral cortex following different methods of fixation. UBE3A staining in tissue fixed by perfusion (a, b). c, d Immersion fixation of mouse cortex after a delay of 15 min (similar to the fixation for our surgical material) shows only modest differences, including a subtle condensation of immunopositive cytoplasm. In both cases, UBE3A is expressed through all layers of the neocortex, with strong nuclear staining and weaker staining in somata and dendrites. UBE3A staining is nearly absent in the brain of an AS model mouse fixed by immersion after a delay of 15 min (e, f), further confirming specificity of the UBE3A antibody in brain tissue harvested under conditions similar to surgical biopsy. Scale bar = 100 μm in a, c, and e and 25 μm in b, d, and f

Full size image

To verify antibody specificity, we performed the same procedures on AS model mice (maternal UBE3A knock-out); only a very weak background staining could be detected in these mice (Fig. 2e, f). We conclude that a 15-min delay in fixation does not significantly alter the distribution of UBE3A.

Image analysis

To compare the level of nuclear UBE3A between excitatory neurons and GABAergic neurons, we acquired 58 random fields of human cortical layers II/III (100 μm × 100 μm, from Q1010, Q1011, and Q1012) from material quadruple-stained for UBE3A, GABA, NeuroTrace, and DAPI. To minimize artifacts arising from limited penetration, confocal images were acquired just below the section surface. For each neuron, the intensity of UBE3A staining in the nucleus (defined by DAPI) was computed using FIJI [46]. To control for possible local variations of immunostaining intensity arising from immersion fixation, we computed the ratio of staining in GABA-positive and GABA-negative neurons from each field individually, reasoning that NeuroTrace-positive neurons that were immunonegative for GABA were very likely to be excitatory.

To examine the quantitative relationship between staining for UBE3A and DAPI, we performed intensity correlation analysis as described by Li et al. [47], using FIJI. The analysis was performed on 92 random nuclei from human cortical layers II/III (from Q1010, Q1011, and Q1012, which yielded particularly robust immunostaining for UBE3A). The imaging was done with the Airyscan mode.

Results

The overall pattern of staining was consistent across biopsy samples from all 9 subjects. UBE3A was found in neurons throughout the depth of cerebral cortex (Fig. 3a–c). Staining within neurons concentrated in the nucleus, but could also be seen in somata and proximal dendrites, and punctate staining was observed in neuropil (Fig. 3d, e). The apparent lack of nuclear staining in some neurons was interpreted as an artifact arising from limited antibody penetration, since it was not seen in neurons whose nucleus lay at the section edge. Examination of thin (< 300 nm) sections showed that much of the nuclear staining was organized into discrete tiny aggregates of DAB reaction product distributed through the nucleus (Fig. 3f).

Fig. 3
figure 3

UBE3A expression in temporal cortex from a human biopsy specimen. a Immunoperoxidase staining for UBE3A. As can be seen by comparison with adjacent Nissl-stained section (b), the large majority of neurons are immunopositive. c Enlargement of boxed area from a; UBE3A is expressed throughout all layers of temporal cortex. d, e Higher magnification micrographs show UBE3A concentrating in nuclei. Antigen is also visible in somata and neuropil, but at lower levels. f High magnification micrograph of a 250-nm plastic section shows discrete grains of immunoperoxidase reaction product scattered through most of the nucleus, but seemingly excluded from certain regions. Tissue from case no. Q1019. Scale bar = 1 mm in a and b, 250 μm in c, 50 μm in d, 25 μm in e, and 10 μm in f

Full size image

GABAergic deficits have been implicated in the pathogenesis of neocortical hyperexcitability and epilepsy in AS model mice [25, 48], and GABA transporter-1 has been proposed as a potential UBE3A substrate [49]. To determine whether UBE3A is expressed in inhibitory neurons of the human neocortex, as it is in mice, we performed double labeling with GABA (Fig. 4). We found that GABAergic neurons, like pyramidal neurons, express higher levels of UBE3A in their nuclei than in their somata. However, quantitative analysis of biopsy material from three subjects revealed that the concentration of nuclear UBE3A is ~ 40% (38 ± 6.4%, n = 51) higher in pyramidal neurons than in GABAegic neurons. In addition, colocalization was observed in fine processes and puncta distributed through the neuropil (Fig. 4c, d).

Fig. 4
figure 4

UBE3A expression in GABAergic neurons in temporal cortex from a human biopsy specimen. a Double labeling reveals UBE3A in the nuclei and somata of GABAergic neurons (arrows). b A pyramidal neuron immunopositive for UBE3A is surrounded by numerous GABA-positive structures likely to represent cross sections of dendrites and axon terminals. Enlargements in c and d show the presence of UBE3A in some of these small GABA-positive structures. Tissue from case no. Q1010. Scale bar = 50 μm in a, 10 μm in b, and 2 μm in c and d

Full size image

In mice, UBE3A is expressed not only in neurons but also neuroglia. To evaluate its distribution in non-neuronal cells in the human temporal cortex, we performed double staining with Olig2, to identify oligodendrocytes (Fig. 5a, b). Indeed Olig2-positive somata were consistently immunopositive for UBE3A, though to a lesser degree than seen in neurons. We also performed double staining with GFAP to identify astrocytes, finding that astrocytes also expressed UBE3A, though generally at lower levels than either neurons or oligodendrocytes (Fig. 5c, d). These patterns were reminiscent of UBE3A staining of neuroglia in the mouse brain [43].

Fig. 5
figure 5

UBE3A expression in neuroglia in temporal cortex from human biopsy specimen. a, b Double labeling reveals UBE3A in the nuclei and somata of Olig2-positive glia (oligodendrocytes, arrowheads). However, UBE3A staining in Olig2-positive glia (b, arrowhead) is appears weaker than in neurons (b, arrow). c Double labeling reveals UBE3A in the nuclei and somata in GFAP-positive cells (astrocytes). UBE3A in GFAP-positive cells is at lower levels than in neurons and Olig2-positive glia. Tissue from case no. Q1010. Scale bar = 50 μm in a, 10 μm in b and c, and 5 μm in d

Full size image

To get a better understanding of the subcellular organization of UBE3A, we performed high-resolution immunofluorescence microscopy. In images prepared using an Airyscan confocal microscope (Fig. 6), UBE3A staining appeared as discrete puncta whose density was high in the nucleus and also present (though at lower densities) in somata and proximal dendrites; scattered puncta of immunolabel were seen in neuropil (Fig. 6a). In the nucleus, UBE3A puncta were interspersed with DAPI “hotspots,” but did not overlap with them (Fig. 6b, c). Likewise, UBE3A staining seemed to be excluded from nucleoli (Nu, Fig. 6b). To more directly test the relationship between UBE3A and DNA condensation, we computed the intensity correlation quotient [47] (ICQ, computed such that − 0.5 represents perfect negative covariance and 0.5 represents perfect positive covariance between two antigens) for 92 nuclei from 3 humans Q1010, Q1011, and Q1012 (Fig. 7). We found an average ICQ of − 0.04 ± 0.005, showing that UBE3A and DAPI staining negatively co-vary, confirming our qualitative impression that UBE3A is excluded from regions of condensed DNA.

Fig. 6
figure 6

High magnification immunofluorescence, showing UBE3A (green) in two pyramidal neurons in layer V in temporal cortex from human biopsy specimen (a). Sections were counterstained with DAPI (red) to visualize nuclei. UBE3A staining is organized into small puncta that concentrate in neuronal nuclei. Small UBE3A-positive puncta are visible in somata and proximal dendrites, and throughout the neuropil. Successive enlargements (b, c) show that UBE3A puncta are excluded from the nucleolus (Nu) and from DAPI “hotspots.” Scale bar = 10 μm in a, 5 μm in b, and 1 μm in c. Tissue from case no. Q1019

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Quantification of the reciprocal localization of UBE3A and DAPI in human neuronal nuclei. To analyze the relationship between UBE3A and DAPI in neuronal nuclei, we used the intensity correlation analysis approach of Li et al. [47]. Analyses are presented as intensity correlation plots: the x value, (channel 1 pixel value–channel 1 mean value) × (channel 2 value–channel 2 mean value), reflect the covariance of both channels, and the y value reflects the intensity of channels 1 or 2. Pixels with values situated left of the x = 0 line do not colocalize or have inversely correlated intensities, whereas pixels situated on the right side colocalize (see diagram in a). Scatterplot in b and c corresponds to the nuclear region of the sections used for illustration in Fig. 6b (Scatterplots are from raw confocal images, while contrast and brightness were adjusted in the micrographs). Panel c shows DAPI with respect to UBE3A, and d shows UBE3A with respect to DAPI. Both plots are skewed toward negative values, implying that UBE3A and DAPI pixel intensity co-varies in opposite directions. d Box and whiskers plot of intensity correlation quotient (ICQ, [47]) from 92 nuclei from layers II–III. ICQ values ~ 0 imply random staining, 0 > ICQ ≥ − 0.5 indicate segregated (negatively correlated) staining, and 0 < ICQ ≤ + 0.5 indicate dependent (positively correlated) staining. We found an average ICQ of − 0.04 ± 0.005, showing that UBE3A and DAPI staining negatively co-vary

Full size image

We used electron microscopy to examine the subcellular organization of UBE3A with higher precision, using pre-embedding immunogold labeling followed by silver intensification (Fig. 8). We focused our attention on layers II–III as we had done previously for mouse [41]. Labeling was prominent in nuclei but was also present in somatic cytoplasm and neuropil, echoing the results from light microscopy (Fig. 6). In the nucleus, UBE3A labeling was largely restricted to euchromatin domains; very little labeling was found over electron-dense heterochromatin zones (Fig. 8a, b), as was predicted by our ICQ analysis of UBE3A/DAPI colocalization (Fig. 7). UBE3A was also excluded from nuclear organelles such as nucleoli. Occasional gold/silver particles were associated with the nuclear membrane. In neuronal cytoplasm, UBE3A was seen decorating the Golgi apparatus and was associated with the outer mitochondrial membrane (Fig. 8c, d). In dendrites, labeling was often associated with the plasma membrane and with poorly defined tubulo-vesicular endomembranous structures. In dendritic spines, labeling was within the spine head and neck, including the spine apparatus, but was not found at the PSD (Fig. 8e). The majority of labeling within the neuropil was found in axon terminals making axospinous, axodendritic, and axosomatic synapses (Fig. 8e, f). In axon terminals, UBE3A associated with the plasma membrane and over clusters of presynaptic vesicles, but did not show a special affinity for the active zone. Double labeling experiments showed that UBE3A is expressed in GABAergic terminals (Fig. 8g).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Pre-embedding immunogold labeling for UBE3A in layer II/III lateral temporal cortex from human biopsy specimen. a, b UBE3A labeling in nucleus (colorized in blue); labeling is over euchromatin (Ec) domains, but is not associated with heterochromatin (Hc) or nucleoli (Nu). c UBE3A labeling associated with endomembranes of the Golgi apparatus. d UBE3A labeling in cytoplasm; arrows point to label associated with mitochondria. e, f UBE3A labeling in presynaptic terminals (colorized in green) and a dendritic spine (colorized in red). g A GABAegic terminal (colorized in yellow) labeled for UBE3A (pre-embedding, irregular 30–50 nm particles of silver-intensified immunogold, arrowheads) and GABA (post-embedding, 20 nm gold). Tissue from case no. Q1010 in a, c, d, e, and f and Q1019 in b and g. Scale bar = 1 μm in a and b, 250 nm in c and g, and 500 nm in d–f

Full size image

Discussion

While previous studies have examined human UBE3A expression using Western blot analysis [50, 51] and in human-induced pluripotent stem cells [52, 53], the present work provides the first high-resolution description of the subcellular distribution of UBE3A in the human brain. Though reporting only the presence of a molecule, not its functional level of activity, immunohistochemistry can shed light on important aspects of human neurophysiology and neuropathology inaccessible by even the most sensitive contemporary methods of live brain imaging. However, immunohistochemistry may be misleading unless tissue of excellent quality is studied. The potential for error is particularly troublesome when tissue of poor quality is examined using super-resolution methods. Several indirect methods are customarily used to assess the quality of human histological material including tissue pH and specific markers of RNA quality [54]. We used electron microscopy to assess tissue quality directly, finding that histological and immunocytochemical staining at the light microscopic level can appear to be satisfactory even in material that has been severely degraded, potentially resulting in misleading results.

Based on examination of surgically resected tissue of high ultrastructural quality, we conclude that UBE3A is broadly expressed by both excitatory (pyramidal) and inhibitory (GABAergic) neurons of the human cerebral cortex. Epilepsy, a common comorbidity in AS, is thought to reflect a disrupted balance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission. We recently demonstrated in an animal model that selective deletion of Ube3a in GABAergic neurons causes both circuit hyperexcitability and seizures; the presence of UBE3A in inhibitory neurons of the human neocortex further supports the hypothesis that GABAergic neurons play a key role in precipitating the electroencephalographic abnormalities and epilepsy seen in AS.

UBE3A may also serve important functions in glia. For example, flies with glia-specific overexpression of Dube3a (the fly UBE3A homolog) display a robust seizure phenotype, suggesting a possible role for glial UBE3A in Dup15q pathophysiology [55]. Our finding that UBE3A is also expressed in glia in the human brain (though at a lower level than in neurons) is consistent with this possibility.

We found that UBE3A is expressed in multiple subcellular compartments. In neurons, it concentrates in euchromatin-rich domains within the nucleus, where it is positioned to regulate the expression of active genes, possibly exerting cell-wide global effects. A recent study shows that increasing UBE3A in the nucleus downregulates the glutamatergic synapse organizer Cbln1 [26], leading to weakened glutamatergic transmission; the same study found impaired sociability in these mutant mice, providing a possible explanation for how UBE3A overexpression might lead to autism spectrum disorder. Nuclear UBE3A may also perform additional roles. Like other ubiquitin E3 ligases, UBE3A may modulate the abundance and activity of transcriptional activators via its ubiquitin-protein ligase activity, thus modulating the formation of transcriptional complexes at genes and regulating chromatin structure [56]. UBE3A might also act more directly within the nucleus as a transcriptional co-regulator [36, 57,58,59].

UBE3A labeling was also associated with mitochondria. Loss of UBE3A has been linked to key enzymatic deficits in the mitochondrial respiratory chain [17, 18]. A role for mitochondrial abnormalities in the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorders has also been suggested [60], and mitochondrial dysfunction has been shown in autistic patients with 15q inverted duplication [61].

The enrichment of UBE3A that we observed in both excitatory and GABAergic axon terminals and (to a lesser extent) in dendritic spines is of special interest since both Dup15q and AS mouse models show synaptic deficits [13, 25, 62]. Postsynaptically, abnormal function of excitatory synapses in UBE3A mutant mice has been linked to decreased UBE3A-mediated proteasomal degradation of the RhoA guanine exchange factor Ephexin5 and to pathways modulated by the synaptic protein Arc [23, 24, 58, 63]. UBE3A has also been shown to target the small-conductance potassium channel SK2 for degradation. Decreased NMDA receptor activation due to an elevated SK2 protein level may underlie the impaired LTP seen in AS model mice [62]. Presynaptically, the localization of UBE3A over vesicle clusters is surprising, since no integral synaptic vesicle proteins have yet been identified as targets for UBE3A [64]. However, UBE3A does appear to modulate the degradation of α-synuclein, a protein closely associated with synaptic vesicles [65,66,67,68], and loss of UBE3A can alter rates of synaptic depression [25, 48]. Although the mechanistic basis of UBE3A-associated synaptic disruption remains unclear, our data support a role for UBE3A in regulating synapses in the human neocortex.

The overall pattern of UBE3A immunoreactivity we found in human temporal cortex is generally consistent with that seen in previous studies of rodent cortex, reinforcing the idea that mice offer a valuable model in which to study the role of UBE3A in the brain. Mouse models of AS display many Angelman-like phenotypes, including learning and memory deficits, motor dysfunction, and seizures, while transgenic mice expressing UBE3A at increased dosages manifest several core autistic behavioral traits [26]. Nevertheless, some divergence between mouse and human UBE3A expression is likely. In particular, regulatory elements may have evolved in humans to sculpt UBE3A expression (which is spatiotemporally ubiquitous in the mouse) into unique and discrete patterns across the neocortex and throughout the cerebrum during development [69]. This remains to be tested in diverse samples of the developing and adult human brain.

Conclusions

That UBE3A is expressed at high levels in both excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the human cerebral cortex points to the many ways that its dysregulation might disrupt circuit function, while its concentration at synapses and in nuclei offers intriguing functional clues. UBE3A in axon terminals presumably regulates the function of individual synapses; in contrast, its concentration in euchromatin-rich nuclear domains suggests that UBE3A may also mediate global effects on neuronal physiology, by regulating gene transcription. This information identifies axon terminals and nuclei as two distinct potential targets for future clinical intervention.

Abbreviations

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

E6-AP:

E6AP ubiquitin-protein ligase

GABA:

γ-Aminobutyric acid

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

HECT:

Homologous to E6-AP carboxyl-terminus

NDBB:

Neurodegenerative disease brain bank

Olig2:

Oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2

PB:

Phosphate buffer

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PFA:

Paraformaldehyde

RAD23A:

Rad23 homolog A, nucleotide excision repair protein

RIN:

RNA integrity number

UBE3A:

Ubiquitin-protein ligase E3A

UPP:

Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway

References

  1. Hegde AN, Haynes KA, Bach SV, Beckelman BC. Local ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated proteolysis and long-term synaptic plasticity. Front Mol Neurosci. 2014;7:96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hegde AN. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and synaptic plasticity. Learn Mem. 2010;17:314–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pelzer C, Kassner I, Matentzoglu K, Singh RK, Wollscheid HP, Scheffner M, Schmidtke G, Groettrup M. UBE1L2, a novel E1 enzyme specific for ubiquitin. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:23010–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shang F, Deng G, Obin M, Wu CC, Gong X, Smith D, Laursen RA, Andley UP, Reddan JR, Taylor A. Ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1) isoforms in lens epithelial cells: origin of translation, E2 specificity and cellular localization determined with novel site-specific antibodies. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73:827–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beer-Romero P, Glass S, Rolfe M. Antisense targeting of E6AP elevates p53 in HPV-infected cells but not in normal cells. Oncogene. 1997;14:595–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsuura T, Sutcliffe JS, Fang P, Galjaard RJ, Jiang YH, Benton CS, Rommens JM, Beaudet AL. De novo truncating mutations in E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase gene (UBE3A) in Angelman syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;15:74–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kishino T, Lalande M, Wagstaff J. UBE3A/E6-AP mutations cause Angelman syndrome. Nat Genet. 1997;15:70–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bird LM. Angelman syndrome: review of clinical and molecular aspects. Appl Clin Genet. 2014;7:93–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glessner JT, Wang K, Cai G, Korvatska O, Kim CE, Wood S, Zhang H, Estes A, Brune CW, Bradfield JP, et al. Autism genome-wide copy number variation reveals ubiquitin and neuronal genes. Nature. 2009;459:569–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hogart A, Wu D, LaSalle JM, Schanen NC. The comorbidity of autism with the genomic disorders of chromosome 15q11.2-q13. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;38:181–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nurmi EL, Bradford Y, Chen Y, Hall J, Arnone B, Gardiner MB, Hutcheson HB, Gilbert JR, Pericak-Vance MA, Copeland-Yates SA, et al. Linkage disequilibrium at the Angelman syndrome gene UBE3A in autism families. Genomics. 2001;77:105–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Baron CA, Tepper CG, Liu SY, Davis RR, Wang NJ, Schanen NC, Gregg JP. Genomic and functional profiling of duplicated chromosome 15 cell lines reveal regulatory alterations in UBE3A-associated ubiquitin-proteasome pathway processes. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:853–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith SE, Zhou YD, Zhang G, Jin Z, Stoppel DC, Anderson MP. Increased gene dosage of Ube3a results in autism traits and decreased glutamate synaptic transmission in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:103ra197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Noor A, Dupuis L, Mittal K, Lionel AC, Marshall CR, Scherer SW, Stockley T, Vincent JB, Mendoza-Londono R, Stavropoulos DJ. 15q11.2 duplication encompassing only the UBE3A gene is associated with developmental delay and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Hum Mutat. 2015;36:689–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi JJ, Berrios J, Newbern JM, Snider WD, Philpot BD, Hahn KM, Zylka MJ. An autism-linked mutation disables phosphorylation control of UBE3A. Cell. 2015;162:795–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Condon KH, Ho J, Robinson CG, Hanus C, Ehlers MD. The Angelman syndrome protein Ube3a/E6AP is required for Golgi acidification and surface protein sialylation. J Neurosci. 2013;33:3799–814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Su H, Fan W, Coskun PE, Vesa J, Gold JA, Jiang YH, Potluri P, Procaccio V, Acab A, Weiss JH, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in CA1 hippocampal neurons of the UBE3A deficient mouse model for Angelman syndrome. Neurosci Lett. 2011;487:129–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Llewellyn KJ, Nalbandian A, Gomez A, Wei D, Walker N, Kimonis VE. Administration of CoQ10 analogue ameliorates dysfunction of the mitochondrial respiratory chain in a mouse model of Angelman syndrome. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;76:77–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Santini E, Turner KL, Ramaraj AB, Murphy MP, Klann E, Kaphzan H. Mitochondrial superoxide contributes to hippocampal synaptic dysfunction and memory deficits in Angelman syndrome model mice. J Neurosci. 2015;35:16213–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weeber EJ, Jiang YH, Elgersma Y, Varga AW, Carrasquillo Y, Brown SE, Christian JM, Mirnikjoo B, Silva A, Beaudet AL, Sweatt JD. Derangements of hippocampal calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in a mouse model for Angelman mental retardation syndrome. J Neurosci. 2003;23:2634–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Woerden GM, Harris KD, Hojjati MR, Gustin RM, Qiu S, de Avila Freire R, Jiang YH, Elgersma Y, Weeber EJ. Rescue of neurological deficits in a mouse model for Angelman syndrome by reduction of alphaCaMKII inhibitory phosphorylation. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:280–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yashiro K, Riday TT, Condon KH, Roberts AC, Bernardo DR, Prakash R, Weinberg RJ, Ehlers MD, Philpot BD. Ube3a is required for experience-dependent maturation of the neocortex. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:777–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Greer PL, Hanayama R, Bloodgood BL, Mardinly AR, Lipton DM, Flavell SW, Kim TK, Griffith EC, Waldon Z, Maehr R, et al. The Angelman syndrome protein Ube3A regulates synapse development by ubiquitinating arc. Cell. 2010;140:704–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Margolis SS, Salogiannis J, Lipton DM, Mandel-Brehm C, Wills ZP, Mardinly AR, Hu L, Greer PL, Bikoff JB, Ho HY, et al. EphB-mediated degradation of the RhoA GEF Ephexin5 relieves a developmental brake on excitatory synapse formation. Cell. 2010;143:442–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallace ML, Burette AC, Weinberg RJ, Philpot BD. Maternal loss of Ube3a produces an excitatory/inhibitory imbalance through neuron type-specific synaptic defects. Neuron. 2012;74:793–800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Krishnan V, Stoppel DC, Nong Y, Johnson MA, Nadler MJ, Ozkaynak E, Teng BL, Nagakura I, Mohammad F, Silva MA, et al. Autism gene Ube3a and seizures impair sociability by repressing VTA Cbln1. Nature. 2017;543:507–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reiter LT, Seagroves TN, Bowers M, Bier E. Expression of the Rho-GEF Pbl/ECT2 is regulated by the UBE3A E3 ubiquitin ligase. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2825–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sell GL, Margolis SS. From UBE3A to Angelman syndrome: a substrate perspective. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar S, Talis AL, Howley PM. Identification of HHR23A as a substrate for E6-associated protein-mediated ubiquitination. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:18785–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramamoorthy S, Nawaz Z. E6-associated protein (E6-AP) is a dual function coactivator of steroid hormone receptors. Nucl Recept Signal. 2008;6:e006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martinez-Noel G, Galligan JT, Sowa ME, Arndt V, Overton TM, Harper JW, Howley PM. Identification and proteomic analysis of distinct UBE3A/E6AP protein complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:3095–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tomaic V, Banks L. Angelman syndrome-associated ubiquitin ligase UBE3A/E6AP mutants interfere with the proteolytic activity of the proteasome. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jacobson AD, MacFadden A, Wu Z, Peng J, Liu CW. Autoregulation of the 26S proteasome by in situ ubiquitination. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25:1824–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee SY, Ramirez J, Franco M, Lectez B, Gonzalez M, Barrio R, Mayor U. Ube3a, the E3 ubiquitin ligase causing Angelman syndrome and linked to autism, regulates protein homeostasis through the proteasomal shuttle Rpn10. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:2747–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Martinez A, Ramirez J, Osinalde N, Arizmendi JM, Mayor U. Neuronal proteomic analysis of the ubiquitinated substrates of the disease-linked E3 ligases Parkin and Ube3a. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:3180413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nawaz Z, Lonard DM, Smith CL, Lev-Lehman E, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. The Angelman syndrome-associated protein, E6-AP, is a coactivator for the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:1182–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bernassola F, Karin M, Ciechanover A, Melino G. The HECT family of E3 ubiquitin ligases: multiple players in cancer development. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:10–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pal P, Lochab S, Kanaujiya JK, Kapoor I, Sanyal S, Behre G, Trivedi AK. E6AP, an E3 ubiquitin ligase negatively regulates granulopoiesis by targeting transcription factor C/EBPalpha for ubiquitin-mediated proteasome degradation. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jiang YH, Armstrong D, Albrecht U, Atkins CM, Noebels JL, Eichele G, Sweatt JD, Beaudet AL. Mutation of the Angelman ubiquitin ligase in mice causes increased cytoplasmic p53 and deficits of contextual learning and long-term potentiation. Neuron. 1998;21:799–811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mulherkar SA, Jana NR. Loss of dopaminergic neurons and resulting behavioural deficits in mouse model of Angelman syndrome. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;40:586–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Burette AC, Judson MC, Burette S, Phend KD, Philpot BD, Weinberg RJ. Subcellular organization of UBE3A in neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2017;525:233–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. McTigue DM, Tripathi RB. The life, death, and replacement of oligodendrocytes in the adult CNS. J Neurochem. 2008;107:1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Judson MC, Sosa-Pagan JO, Del Cid WA, Han JE, Philpot BD. Allelic specificity of Ube3a expression in the mouse brain during postnatal development. J Comp Neurol. 2014;522:1874–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Knott G, Rosset S, Cantoni M. Focussed ion beam milling and scanning electron microscopy of brain tissue. J Vis Exp. 2011;53:e2588.

  45. Knott G, Marchman H, Wall D, Lich B. Serial section scanning electron microscopy of adult brain tissue using focused ion beam milling. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2959–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Li Q, Lau A, Morris TJ, Guo L, Fordyce CB, Stanley EF. A syntaxin 1, Galpha(o), and N-type calcium channel complex at a presynaptic nerve terminal: analysis by quantitative immunocolocalization. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4070–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Judson MC, Wallace ML, Sidorov MS, Burette AC, Gu B, van Woerden GM, King IF, Han JE, Zylka MJ, Elgersma Y, et al. GABAergic neuron-specific loss of Ube3a causes Angelman syndrome-like EEG abnormalities and enhances seizure susceptibility. Neuron. 2016;90:56–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Egawa K, Kitagawa K, Inoue K, Takayama M, Takayama C, Saitoh S, Kishino T, Kitagawa M, Fukuda A. Decreased tonic inhibition in cerebellar granule cells causes motor dysfunction in a mouse model of Angelman syndrome. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:163ra157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Williams K, Irwin DA, Jones DG, Murphy KM. Dramatic loss of Ube3A expression during aging of the mammalian cortex. Front Aging Neurosci. 2010;2:18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Daily J, Smith AG, Weeber EJ. Spatial and temporal silencing of the human maternal UBE3A gene. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012;16:587–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chamberlain SJ, Chen PF, Ng KY, Bourgois-Rocha F, Lemtiri-Chlieh F, Levine ES, Lalande M. Induced pluripotent stem cell models of the genomic imprinting disorders Angelman and Prader-Willi syndromes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:17668–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Stanurova J, Neureiter A, Hiber M, de Oliveira Kessler H, Stolp K, Goetzke R, Klein D, Bankfalvi A, Klump H, Steenpass L. Angelman syndrome-derived neurons display late onset of paternal UBE3A silencing. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Stan AD, Ghose S, Gao XM, Roberts RC, Lewis-Amezcua K, Hatanpaa KJ, Tamminga CA. Human postmortem tissue: what quality markers matter? Brain Res. 2006;1123:1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hope KA, LeDoux MS, Reiter LT. Glial overexpression of Dube3a causes seizures and synaptic impairments in Drosophila concomitant with down regulation of the Na(+)/K(+) pump ATPalpha. Neurobiol Dis. 2017;108:238–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Geng F, Wenzel S, Tansey WP. Ubiquitin and proteasomes in transcription. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:177–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Khan OY, Fu G, Ismail A, Srinivasan S, Cao X, Tu Y, Lu S, Nawaz Z. Multifunction steroid receptor coactivator, E6-associated protein, is involved in development of the prostate gland. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20:544–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kuhnle S, Mothes B, Matentzoglu K, Scheffner M. Role of the ubiquitin ligase E6AP/UBE3A in controlling levels of the synaptic protein Arc. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:8888–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. El Hokayem J, Weeber E, Nawaz Z. Loss of Angelman syndrome protein E6AP disrupts a novel antagonistic estrogen-retinoic acid transcriptional crosstalk in neurons. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55:7187–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hollis F, Kanellopoulos AK, Bagni C. Mitochondrial dysfunction in autism Spectrum disorder: clinical features and perspectives. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2017;45:178–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Filipek PA, Juranek J, Smith M, Mays LZ, Ramos ER, Bocian M, Masser-Frye D, Laulhere TM, Modahl C, Spence MA, Gargus JJ. Mitochondrial dysfunction in autistic patients with 15q inverted duplication. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:801–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Sun J, Zhu G, Liu Y, Standley S, Ji A, Tunuguntla R, Wang Y, Claus C, Luo Y, Baudry M, Bi X. UBE3A regulates synaptic plasticity and learning and memory by controlling SK2 channel endocytosis. Cell Rep. 2015;12:449–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Mandel-Brehm C, Salogiannis J, Dhamne SC, Rotenberg A, Greenberg ME. Seizure-like activity in a juvenile Angelman syndrome mouse model is attenuated by reducing Arc expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:5129–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Takamori S, Holt M, Stenius K, Lemke EA, Gronborg M, Riedel D, Urlaub H, Schenck S, Brugger B, Ringler P, et al. Molecular anatomy of a trafficking organelle. Cell. 2006;127:831–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Maroteaux L, Campanelli JT, Scheller RH. Synuclein: a neuron-specific protein localized to the nucleus and presynaptic nerve terminal. J Neurosci. 1988;8:2804–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Jensen PH, Nielsen MS, Jakes R, Dotti CG, Goedert M. Binding of alpha-synuclein to brain vesicles is abolished by familial Parkinson’s disease mutation. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:26292–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Mulherkar SA, Sharma J, Jana NR. The ubiquitin ligase E6-AP promotes degradation of alpha-synuclein. J Neurochem. 2009;110:1955–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Ham A, Kim DW, Kim KH, Lee SJ, Oh KB, Shin J, Mar W. Reynosin protects against neuronal toxicity in dopamine-induced SH-SY5Y cells and 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats as models of Parkinson’s disease: reciprocal up-regulation of E6-AP and down-regulation of alpha-synuclein. Brain Res. 2013;1524:54–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. King MC, Wilson AC. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science. 1975;188:107–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the subjects who donated brain tissue for their invaluable contribution to neuroscientific research. Imaging was supported by the Hooker Imaging Core at UNC.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NS039444 and NS092474 to R.J.W. and R56-NS097831 and R01HD093771 to B.D.P.) and the Angelman Syndrome Foundation (to B.D.P.). The UCSF NDBB receives funding support from NIH grants P01AG019724 and P50AG023501, the Consortium for Frontotemporal Dementia Research, and the Tau Consortium.

Availability of data and materials

The image datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 314 Taylor Hall, Campus, Box 7545, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7545, USA

    Alain C. Burette

  2. Department of Cell Biology and Physiology and Neuroscience Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA

    Matthew C. Judson, Benjamin D. Philpot & Richard J. Weinberg

  3. Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Alissa N. Li & William W. Seeley

  4. Department of Pathology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

    Alissa N. Li & William W. Seeley

  5. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0112, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA

    Edward F. Chang

  6. Neuroscience Curriculum, Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA

    Benjamin D. Philpot

Authors
  1. Alain C. Burette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew C. Judson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alissa N. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edward F. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William W. Seeley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Benjamin D. Philpot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Richard J. Weinberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ANL, EFC, and WWS provided human samples. ACB and MCJ performed the experiments. ACB analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. ACB, BDP, MCJ, and RJW wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain C. Burette.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures regarding human tissue were performed with the approval of the UCSF Committee on Human Research and the University of Maryland Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burette, A.C., Judson, M.C., Li, A.N. et al. Subcellular organization of UBE3A in human cerebral cortex. Molecular Autism 9, 54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-018-0238-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-018-0238-0

Keywords

  • Angelman syndrome
  • E6-AP
  • Axon terminal
  • Mitochondria
  • Euchromatin

Molecular Autism

ISSN: 2040-2392