Skip to main content

Targeting the RHOA pathway improves learning and memory in adult Kctd13 and 16p11.2 deletion mouse models



Gene copy number variants play an important role in the occurrence of neurodevelopmental disorders. Particularly, the deletion of the 16p11.2 locus is associated with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and several other features. Earlier studies highlighted the implication of Kctd13 genetic imbalance in 16p11.2 deletion through the regulation of the RHOA pathway.


Here, we generated a new mouse model with a small deletion of two key exons in Kctd13. Then, we targeted the RHOA pathway to rescue the cognitive phenotypes of the Kctd13 and 16p11.2 deletion mouse models in a pure genetic background. We used a chronic administration of fasudil (HA1077), an inhibitor of the Rho-associated protein kinase, for six weeks in mouse models carrying a heterozygous inactivation of Kctd13, or the deletion of the entire 16p11.2 BP4-BP5 homologous region.


We found that the small Kctd13 heterozygous deletion induced a cognitive phenotype similar to the whole deletion of the 16p11.2 homologous region, in the Del/+ mice. We then showed that chronic fasudil treatment can restore object recognition memory in adult heterozygous mutant mice for Kctd13 and for 16p11.2 deletion. In addition, learning and memory improvement occurred in parallel to change in the RHOA pathway.


The Kcdt13 mutant line does not recapitulate all the phenotypes found in the 16p11.2 Del/+ model. In particular, the locomotor activity was not altered at 12 and 18 weeks of age and the object location memory was not defective in 18-week old mutants. Similarly, the increase in locomotor activity was not modified by the treatment in the 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse model, suggesting that other loci were involved in such defects. Rescue was observed only after four weeks of treatment but no long-term experiment has been carried out so far. Finally, we did not check the social behaviour, which requires working in another hybrid genetic background.


These findings confirm KCTD13 as one target gene causing cognitive deficits in 16p11.2 deletion patients, and the relevance of the RHOA pathway as a therapeutic path for 16p11.2 deletion. In addition, they reinforce the contribution of other gene(s) involved in cognitive defects found in the 16p11.2 models in older mice.


Genetic copy number variants of the 16p11.2 locus are an important risk factor for multiple neurodevelopmental disorders [1,2,3,4,5]. The most recurrent 16p11.2 rearrangements, deletion and reciprocal duplication, induce intellectual disability [6] and Autism Spectrum Disorders [7,8,9,10,11,12]. In addition, they are associated with other neuropsychiatric disorders, such as epilepsy [11], attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder [13], schizophrenia and bipolar trouble [14]. Body mass index phenotypes and abnormal head size have also been reported in these 16p11.2 rearrangements [11,12,13, 15, 16]. The most frequent variation of the 16p11.2 region corresponds to change in the genetic interval between SULT1A1 and SPN1, encompassing 600 kb and 32 genes. Nevertheless, a study conducted in 2011 found a microdeletion of the 118 kb region, containing MVP, SEZ6L2, CDIPT, ASPHD1 and KCTD13 inside the 16p11.2 genetic interval, linked to Autism Spectrum Disorder in a family over three generations [17]. Thus, this MVP-KCTD13 subregion should play a potential key role in the neuropsychiatric features linked to 16p11.2 rearrangement.

Modelling 16p11.2 rearrangements using animal models recapitulates human genetic data. Indeed, three mouse models were developed carrying deletions of the 16p11.2 homologous genetic interval [18,19,20] of slightly different size. Nevertheless, they were found to share common phenotypes including hyperactivity, repetitive behaviours, and deficits in object memory [18,19,20] that are related to certain human cognitive and behavioural features found in the 16p11.2 deletion syndrome [8].

Several studies have been carried out to find the specific brain regions, developmental periods, networks and pathways impacted by the 16p11.2 deletion. In particular, the development of dynamic spatio-temporal networks of 16p11.2 genes integrating data from the brain developmental transcriptome with data from physical interactions of 16p11.2 proteins supported the role of KCTD13 as a protein that complexes with CULLIN 3 (CUL3) ubiquitin ligase, regulating the protein levels of the Ras homolog family member A (RHOA) [21]. The known important functions of the Rho GTPase signalling pathway in brain morphogenesis at early stages of brain development led to the assumption that KCTD13 dosage changes in 16p11.2 deletion or duplication carriers influence RHOA levels and results in impaired brain morphogenesis and cell migration during the foetal stages of brain development [21]. This hypothesis was supported by later studies showing the implication of KCTD13 in abnormal brain size in downregulation experiments in zebrafish [22].

In addition, the Kctd13+/−mouse model showed a reduction of the number of functional synapses, with a decrease of dendritic length, complexity and dendritic spine density due to increased levels of RHOA [23]. These alterations were reversed by RHOA inhibition with rhosin, strengthening the potential role of RHOA as a therapeutic target. Interestingly, the recognition deficit was not seen with this model in another more complex paradigm in which the recognition test was based on 3 objects [23], a more challenging task with multiple recognition steps, involving slightly different memory mechanisms. Also, recent studies revealed dendritic spine maturation alterations of hippocampal pyramidal neurons in another Kctd13+/− mouse model [24]. This model also presented a deficit in recognition and location memory in a paradigm with two objects similar to the phenotype detected in previous studies done on three distinct 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse models [18,19,20]. Surprisingly, no change in RHOA protein level was detected in the most recent study [24].

Despite these investigations, how KCTD13 levels regulate the RHOA signalling pathway, and its implication in the phenotypes associated with the 16p11.2 syndromes, remain unclear. Thus, we decided to explore the role of Kctd13 by engineering a new loss-of-function allele, removing only exons 3 and 4 with CrispR/Cas9, instead of the whole gene [23] or exon 2 [24]. Then, we characterized the novel heterozygous mouse model and compared its outcome with the deletion of 16p11.2 in a selected number of tests.

Furthermore, the integration of our results with earlier studies led us to hypothesize that the 16p11.2 deletion leads to an over-activation of the KCTD13-CUL3-dependent RHOA pathway. Consequently, if we assume that RHOA/ROCK pathway over-activation causes behavioural and learning alterations in the 16p11.2 deletion, inhibiting this pathway should improve the Kctd13+/− and the 16p11.2 Del/+-associated phenotypes. We decided therefore to treat our mice with fasudil (HA1077), an inhibitor of the ROCK kinase from the RHOA pathway. We used a similar strategy to counterbalance the behavioural impairments of the Oligophrenin-1 mouse model of intellectual disability [25]. Thus, we initially planned to characterize the behaviour phenotypes of the new Kctd13 haplo-insufficient model and compare the outcome with the 16p11.2 Del/+ mice. Then, we set up a chronic administration of fasudil (HA1077) in adult Kctd13+/− and 16p11.2 Del/+ mice (this work and [20]) and evaluated the behaviour of the treated versus the non-treated animals. Next, we carried out a molecular analysis of key members of the RHOA pathway.

Materials and methods

Mouse lines, genotyping and ethical statement

Two mouse models were used in the study. The 16p11.2 mouse model corresponds to the Del(7Sult1a1-Spn)6Yah mouse model [20], noted Del/+ here. The line was kept on a pure C57BL/6N inbred genetic background. The deletion allele was identified by PCR using primers Fwd1 (5′-CCTGTGTGTATTCTCAGCCTCAGGATG-3′) and Rev2 (5′-GGACACACAGGAGAGCTATCCAGGTC-3′) to detect a specific band of 500 bp while the wild-type allele was identified using Fwd1 and Rev1 (5′-GGACACACAGGAGAGCTATCCAGGTC-3′) primers to detect the presence of a 330 bp fragment. The PCR program was: 95 °C/5 min; 35 × (95 °C/30 s, 65 °C/30 s, 70 °C/1 min), 70 °C/5 min.

The Kctd13em2(IMPC)Ics knock-out mouse was generated by the CRISPR/Cas9 technology [27] in the C567BL/6N genetic background (Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 1A). Two pairs of sgRNAs, one pair located upstream and the other pair downstream of the target region, were selected to delete exons 3 and 4 of the gene. Both pairs of sgRNAs (showing a cut) and Cas9 mRNA were microinjected into fertilized eggs derived from super-ovulated sexually immature C57BL/6N female mice (4–5 weeks olds). Injected embryos cultured in vitro were implanted in the oviducts of pseudo-pregnant females. The deletion of Kctd13 in Kctd13em2(IMPC)Ics (noted here Kctd13+/−) was confirmed by PCR using primers Ef (5′-ACCTCTTAGCTGGGCATGCTAAATT-3′) and Xr (5′-AGCCTATGCTAACTATTATCACAGG-3′) and the sequence of the deleted fragment. The PCR reaction gave deletion and wild-type products of 429 and 668 bp long, respectively (Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 1B). The PCR program was: 94 °C/5 min, 35 X (94 °C/30 s; 60 °C/30 s; 72 °C/30 s), 72 °C/5 min. This set of primers was also used for genotyping (Additional file 1: Fig. 1B). The model was validated by detecting the decreased level of KCTD13 in the mutant hippocampi compared to control (Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 1C). All the mouse models are available through the Infrafrontier European repository or the International Mouse Phenotyping consortium.

Chronic fasudil treatment

In this study, we developed a protocol for a pre-clinical treatment (Fig. 1) with the drug fasudil hydrochloride or HA1077 (F4660, LC laboratories Boston, MA, USA). At weaning, control wild type littermates and heterozygous male mice, either Kctd13+/−or Del/+ , were taken from several litters and housed in groups of 4–2 individuals in ventilated cages (Green Line, Techniplast, Italy), where they had free access to water and diet (D04 chow diet, Safe, Augy, France). Animal bedding (Poplar litter, AB 3 autoclavable, AniBed, Pontvallain, France) was changed once a week. At 11 weeks, animals were transferred from the animal facility to the phenotyping area. The temperature was kept at 21 ± 2 °C, and the light cycle was controlled as 12 h light and 12 h dark (lights on at 7 am).

Fig. 1

Outline of the behavioral pipeline used for investigating the therapeutic effects of the drug fasudil in the Kctd13+/− and 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse models. We used 3 independent subcohorts of animals for each mouse line. 12-week-old mice were subjected to different behavior and learning tests, after prior habituation to the phenotyping zone. At 14 weeks, each cohort was divided into two groups. The first group started the fasudil treatment and the second group followed the cognitive characterization without treatment. NOL novel object location, NOR novel object recognition

At 12 weeks of age, three independent cohorts of mice for each line, with wild-type (wt) and mutant littermates, were subjected to a battery of behavioural tests (see below) for 2 weeks. Then, 14-week-old mice were randomly divided into 2 groups: one treated with fasudil administrated orally ad libitum in drinking water to reach a dose of 100 mg/kg/day and a second with no treatment. The dose was estimated at 152.7 mg in a feeding bottle (250 ml) changed twice a week, taking into account the previous study in which we verified that the drinking volume was about 4.6 ml/day/mouse [25]. Four weeks after the beginning of the treatment, 18-week-old mice were challenged once again with the same battery of behavioural tests (see below) and kept under the same treatment condition (Fig. 1). The experiments were conducted blindly for genotype as recommended by the ARRIVE guidelines [28, 29]. All animals injured by their cage companions were excluded from the behavioural tests at the time when they were seen. A second batch of three independent cohorts were processed similarly but without behaviour tests for the molecular analysis of the hippocampal region from treated and non-treated mice. In this case, treated animals started the fasudil treatment at the age of 12 weeks, for 6 weeks. Samples were quickly harvested from 18-week-old mice after euthanasia by cervical dislocation and snap frozen for molecular analyses.

Behavioural analysis

We used three tests that previously unravelled robust phenotypes in the three 16p11.2 mouse models [18,19,20]: the open field for the exploration activity, novel object location and novel object recognition for learning and memory in mice. The novel object location (NOL) memory task stimulates the parahippocampal cortex, the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus [26] whereas the novel object recognition (NOR) memory task is based on the innate preference of rodents to explore novelty involving the perirhinal and entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus.

For the open field (OF), mice were tested in an automated arena (44.3 × 44.3 × 16.8 cm) made of PVC with transparent walls and a black floor, and covered with translucent PVC (Panlab, Barcelona, Spain). The arena was divided into central and peripheral regions (8 cm peripheral zone and 28 cm central zone) and homogeneously illuminated at 150 lx. Each mouse was placed on the periphery of the open field and allowed to explore the apparatus freely for 30 min while 16 × 16 infrared captors (located at the periphery at two different levels) recorded the horizontal and vertical position of the mouse. During each session we measured the total distance travelled, evaluated the habituation of the animal over time, by splitting the data in 10-min intervals, and assessed vertical activity through the number of rears.

The NOL memory task was carried out in the same open field arena as previously described. On the first day, mice were habituated to the arena for 30 min at 150 lx. On the following day, animals went through an acquisition trial during the first 10 min in which they were presented individually to 2 identical objects A. Each object was placed 10 cm away from each of the corners on the north side of the box. The exploration time of objects A (when the animal’s snout was directed towards the object at a distance ≤ 1 cm) was manually recorded with a chronometer. Minimum exploration time was set to 3 s, and mice that did not reach this criterion or show any interest for one object were excluded from the study. A 10-min retention trial (second trial) was conducted 5 min later, when one of the familiar objects was displaced to a novel location (B) on the south side and the exploration time (t) of the two objects was recorded for 10 min. The selection of the new object (right or left) was counter balanced across animals. We used two identical cylindrical objects of black colour with a white circle on top. In this session, the minimum exploration time was also set to 3 s, and mice that did not reach this criterion or show any interest (0 s of exploration) in one object were excluded from the study. We verified that no preference was seen during the exploration of the left and right object. The recognition index (RI) was defined as [tB/(tA + tB) × 100]. An RI of 50% corresponds to the chance level and a significantly higher RI reflects good recognition of which object was moved in between the two sessions.

The NOR test was performed in a circular open field of white PVC with opaque walls and floor 30 cm high and 50 cm diameter. On the first and second days, each mouse was habituated to the arena for 15 min at 60 lx. The following day, we started the NOR sessions. First, each animal was individually subjected to a 10 min acquisition trial for the presentation of two identical objects A (either marble or dice) placed at the northeast or northwest of the open field arena. The exploration time of both objects A was recorded. 3 h later (retention delay in home cages), a 10 min retention trial (second trial) was performed. One of the identical objects A was replaced with a novel object B at the same position. The new object location was randomly determined for each animal and overall balance assessed. The exploration time of the two objects (familiar object and novel object) was recorded using the NOLDUS video tracking software. The recognition index (RI) was defined as (tB/(tA + tB) × 100). An RI of 50% corresponds to a chance level and a significantly higher RI reflects good recognition memory. Any mice that did not explore the objects for more than 3 s during the acquisition trial or the retention trial or show any interest for one object were excluded from the analysis.

Western blot

Fresh hippocampal tissues were isolated by rapid decapitation/dissection of naive mice and snap frozen. Then, they were lysed in ice-cold sonication buffer supplemented with Complete™ Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche). Individual samples were disaggregated, centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 min at 14,000 rpm, diluted in 4X Laemmli sample buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol (Bio-Rad, France), and incubated at 95 °C for 5 min. Protein concentration was determined by the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (23,225, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Strasbourg). The samples were diluted with sample buffer such that 30 µg of protein were loaded per lane onto 15% polyacrylamide gel. Gels were run and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes by the Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Transfer System (BioRad, France) using the MIXED MW Bio-Rad Preprogrammed Protocol. Then they were blocked in 5% BSA, 1 X Tris-buffered saline, 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T) and incubated with primary antibody for 10 min. Membranes were washed in TBS-T followed by a 10-min secondary antibody incubation using an HRP conjugated Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (A16096, Invitrogen, France) at 2:10,000 using the SNAP i.d.® 2.0 Protein Detection System (C73105, Merck). This apparatus has a vacuum-driven technology and a built-in flow distributor that actively drives reagents through the membrane.

Total levels of KCTD13, RHOA protein and Myosin Light Chain and its phosphorylation product were analysed using Western Blot. Proteins were visualized with Amersham™ Imager 600. Signals were quantified using ImageJ and analysed using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism. We used the following primary antibodies: KCDT13 (dilution 1:250, HPA043524, Atlas Antibodies, Bromma, Sweden), RHOA (dilution 1:1000; cat #2117, Cell Signaling, USA), MLC (dilution 1:1000;cat # 8505, Cell Signaling Technology Europe, B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands) and pMLC (dilution 1:1000; Thr18/Ser19 cat #3674, Cell signalling, Boston, MA, USA). The ratio of protein (or phosphorylated protein) level was estimated against control β-actin protein level [detected with a mouse monoclonal Anti-β-Actin— Peroxidase antibody (A3854 Sigma)] and normalized to untreated wt sample mean.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was carried out using standard statistical procedures available on the SigmaPlot software (Systat software, San Jose, USA). All outliers were identified using the Grubbs' test from the GraphPad calculator (GraphPad Software, San Diego) or ROUT method with a Q value of 1% from GraphPad Prism 7.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego) for data with nonlinear regression. We estimated a priori the power of the different variables, scored during the behavioural analysis, to test our H0 hypothesis, taking into account our previous analysis of the Del/+ model [20]. A posteriori we verified that the sample size was sufficient to have a statistical power of 100% for the object location and recognition memory at both ages (Additional file 1: Table 1). Nevertheless the powers of the open field variable “distance travelled” were lower at 12 compared to 18 weeks, certainly due to a change in variability. Based on the power calculation we did not consider the results of the rearing activity from the open field. Data from the behavioural characterization of Kctd13+/− and 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse models were analysed by the Student t test (see Additional file 1: Tables 2 and 3 for a summary). One sample t test was used to compare recognition index values to the set chance level (50%). Data from post-treatment behavioural phenotyping of both genetic lines were analysed using one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test whenever data presented normal distribution and equal variance. Otherwise, we used the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance and the Mann–Whitney U test. One sample t test was also used to compare recognition index values to the set chance level (50%). Western blot data were analysed using a Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance test between groups followed by a Mann–Whitney U test or Student t test depending on data distribution. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM and the significant threshold was p < 0.05.


Phenotypic characterization of the new Kctd13 +/− mouse model and comparison with the 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse model

We created a new Kctd13 KO mouse model with the deletion of exons 3 and 4, leading to a frameshift at the transition of exons 2 and 5 (Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 1A–B). We validated the new allele by DNA analysis for the deletion and the decreased expression of KCDT13 in mutant hippocampi (Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 1C), and by phenotyping at the IMPC ( Then, we evaluated its learning and memory behaviour at 12 weeks of age in the open field, NOL and NOR, and compared the results obtained with the characterization of the 16p11.2 Del/+ model (Fig. 2). First, we did not detect significant differences in the open field test (12 weeks), when we measured the total distance travelled by Kctd13+/− mice compared to wt littermates [Fig. 2a left panel, wt (n = 20) and Kctd13+/− (n = 19)]. This result was different from the phenotype of the Del/+ mice [Fig. 2a right panel, wt (n = 38) and Del/+ (n = 32)]. Indeed Del/+ mutant mice were more active with a significant increase in the distance travelled compared to their wt littermates [Student t test: total distance: wt vs. Del/+t(68) = − 4.096; p < 0.001], as previously observed [20]. Then, we analysed the distance travelled in 5-min intervals, to observe the habituation to a new environment during the test. We found that the Kctd13+/− mice experienced a similar habituation to the control individuals (Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 2A). Here too, a significant difference was seen in the 16p11.2 Del/+ carrier mice [paired t test: T0–10 vs. T20–30 t(31) = 14,319; p < 0.001]. Although they were more active, the mutant mice showed normal habituation compared to their wild-type littermates.

Fig. 2

Exploration activity in the a open field test, b novel object location and c novel object recognition of the Kctd13+/− and the 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse models at 12 and 13 weeks of age. a Male mice from the Kctd13+/− line [wt (n = 20) and Kctd13+/− (n = 19)] and from the 16p11.2 Del/+ line [wt (n = 38) and Del/+ (n = 32)] were free to explore the open field for 30 min as a new environment. First, the exploration activity was analysed from the total distance travelled during the test. Next, the adaptation of the mice to the environment was evaluated by dividing the test into periods of 10 min. The Kctd13+/− animals showed no alteration compared to their wt littermate whereas the 16p11.2 Del/+ mice showed increased exploratory activity in the distance travelled compared to wt. The Del/+ mutant individuals displayed a decrease in the area of exploration during the test and thus normal habituation to the new environment. b In the NOL test, the recognition index reflects the ability of mice from the two lines [wt (n = 20) and Kctd13+/− (n = 21) littermates; and 16p11.2 Del/+ (wt (n = 28) and Del/+ (n = 27) littermates] to distinguish the new located object from the familiar one after a 5 min retention delay. The Kctd13+/− and the Del/+ male mice showed a deficit in object location recognition memory compared to their wt littermates. c In the NOR test, the animals [wt (n = 24) and Kctd13+/− (n = 23) littermates; and wt (n = 27) and Del/+ (n = 30) littermates] were challenged to recognize the new object from the familiar object after a 3 h delay. Kctd13+/− and the Del/+ mice showed a poor object recognition memory compared to their respective wt littermates; (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)

Afterwards, we analysed the object location memory (Fig. 2b). For this test, animals (wt (n = 20) and Kctd13+/− (n = 21) littermates; and 16p11.2 Del/+ [wt (n = 28) and Del/+ (n = 27) littermates] were scored for their ability to distinguish between a previously presented object that remained in the same location and another object whose position was changed, after a retention delay of 5 min. The recognition indexes for the novel object location showed that, contrary to their wt littermates, both Kctd13+/− and 16p11.2 Del/+ mice were not able to differentiate between the novel and familiar location [one sample t test for the Kctd13+/− line: wt (t(19) = 4.4607; p = 0.0003), Kctd13+/− (t(16) = 0.9170; p = 0.3728); and the 16p11.2 Del/+ model: wt (t(27) = 3.2299; p = 0.0032), Del/+ (t(26) = 1.8372; p = 0.0776)].

Finally, we investigated whether Kctd13+/− mice [wt (n = 24) and Kctd13+/− (n = 23) littermates] could discriminate a novel object from a previously explored set of two objects after a retention delay of 3 h in the NOR task and we verified the deficiency found in recognition memory in the 16p11.2 mutant mice (n = 30) compared to wt littermates (n = 27) (Fig. 2c). Whereas wt animals were able to differentiate objects showing a novel object preference, Kctd13+/− mice were not able to discriminate the novel from the familiar object. The deficit was like that seen in the 16p11.2 Del/+ mice [one sample t test for the Kctd13+/− model: wt (t(23) = 3.0558; p = 0.0056), Kctd13+/− (t(22) = 0.0805; p = 0.9366); and the 16p11.2 Del/+ model: wt (t(26) = 2.5312; p = 0.0178), Del/+ (t(29) = 1.0119; p = 0.3199)]. Overall, our behavioural analysis showed that the Kctd13 haploinsufficiency phenocopied the object location and recognition memory deficits seen in the 16p11.2 deletion model in the same pure C57BL/6N genetic background. However, the increased exploration activity found in the 16p11.2 Del/+ mice was not seen in the Kctd13+/− mutant mice.

Fasudil treatment partially reverses the cognitive impairment in the Kctd13 +/− and the 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse models.

Thus, after the behavioural characterization of the Kctd13+/− and 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse models, at 14 weeks of age, individuals from both genotypes were randomly assigned to two subgroups: one was an untreated control group and the other one was treated with fasudil for 4 weeks prior to further behaviour testing (Fig. 1) and then continued to be treated during the 2 weeks of testing. First, we noticed that the fasudil treatment did not change the locomotor exploration activity of the different genotypes from the Kctd13+/− [non-treated wt (n = 11), treated wt (n = 9), non-treated Kctd13+/− (n = 10) and treated Kctd13+/− (n = 9)] or from the 16p11.2 Del/+ line [non-treated wt (n = 20), treated wt (n = 18), non-treated Del/+ (n = 15) and treated Del/+ (n = 14)] (Fig. 3a; Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 3A). We revalidated that Del/+ individuals travelled more than the control wt (Two way ANOVA between groups: F(1,63) = 28.14; p < 0.001; Tukey’s post hoc tests: wt vs. Del/+: p < 0.001, treated vs. non-treated: p = 0.791, non-treated wt vs. treated wt: p = 0.264, non-treated Del/+ vs. treated Del/+: p = 0.186, non-treated wt vs. non-treated Del/+: p = 0.013 and treated wt vs. treated Del/+: p < 0.001). Interestingly, treated Del/+ individuals experienced a less pronounced decrease in activity throughout the test (paired t test: T0–10 vs. T20–30 t(13) = 2.010; p = 0.066). The treatment did not have an effect for any genotype on the vertical activity (Two way ANOVA between groups: F(1,63) = 6.775; p = 0.01; Tukey’s post hoc tests: wt vs. Del/+: p = 0.012, treated vs. non-treated: p = 0.707, non-treated wt vs. treated wt: p = 0.743, non-treated Del/+ vs. treated Del/+: p = 0.432, non-treated wt vs. non-treated Del/+: p = 0.2 and treated wt vs. treated Del/+: p = 0.021, Fig. 3b, Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 3B). As in the earlier stage, the 18-week-old Kctd13 deficient mice were not more active in the open field than their control littermates. Interestingly, one month after the first phenotypic characterization, mutant mice from the Kctd13+/− line [non-treated wt (n = 11), treated wt (n = 13), non-treated Kctd13+/− (n = 13) and treated Kctd13+/− (n = 10) littermates] performed in the NOL (Fig. 3b) but with a lower recognition index compared to wt [one sample t test: non treated wt (t(10) = 3.9679; p = 0.0027), treated wt (t(11) = 5.3506; p = 0.0002), non-treated Kctd13+/− (t(12) = 2.3628; p = 0.0359), treated Kctd13+/− (t(8) = 5.7266; p = 0.0004)]. In contrast, no improvement was observed at 18 weeks of age in heterozygous mice from the 16p11.2 Del/+ line (non-treated wt (n = 13), treated wt (n = 15), non-treated Del/+ (n = 8) and treated Del/+ (n = 15) littermates) (Fig. 3b) and the fasudil treatment was not able to restore this ability in this mouse model [one sample t test: non-treated wt (t(11) = 5.4167; p = 0.0002), treated wt (t(13) = 4.4492; p = 0.0007), non-treated Del/+ (t(7) = 0.9837; p = 0.3580), treated Del/+ (t(14) = 2.1021; p = 0.0541)]. However, fasudil treatment significantly improved the NOR defect found in both Kctd13+/− [non-treated wt (n = 12), treated wt (n = 11), non-treated Kctd13+/− (n = 14) and treated Kctd13+/− (n = 10)] and 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse model [non-treated wt (n = 17), treated wt (n = 9), non-treated Del/+ (n = 13) and treated Del/+ (n = 13)] at 19 weeks of age (Fig. 3c). Here the altered recognition memory, found previously at 12 weeks, was seen again in mutants at 19 weeks and the fasudil treatment had a rescuing effect both in the Kctd13+/− [one sample t test: non-treated wt (t(11) = 2.6929; p = 0.0209), treated wt (t(10) = 5.7297; p = 0.0002), non-treated Kctd13+/− (t(11) = 2.6101; p = 0.0243 (less than 50%), treated Kctd13+/− (t(9) = 3.1937; p = 0.0109)] and in the 16p11.2 Del/+ mice [(One sample t test: non-treated wt (t(16) = 2.3736; p = 0.0305), treated wt (t(8) = 2.4481; p = 0.0401), non-treated Del/+ (t(12) = 0.3787; p = 0.7115), treated Del/+ (t(10) = 2.9168; p = 0.0154)]. It also highlights that at least one gene, deleted in the 16p11.2 Del/+ model and different from Kctd13, contributes to the NOL phenotype in this model at this latter age.

Fig. 3

Exploration activity in the a open field test, b novel object location and c novel object recognition of the Kctd13+/− and the 16p11.2 Del/+b mouse models with or without fasudil treatment. a The Kctd13+/− animals showed no alteration compared to their wt littermate whereas the Del/+ mice showed increase exploratory activity in the distance travelled during the exploration of the open field for 30 min, which was not affected by the fasudil treatment. b For NOL test, recognition index reflects the ability of mice to distinguish the new location of an object from the familiar one after a 5 min retention delay. We observed again that the 16p11.2 Del/+ male mice showed a deficit in object location memory compared to their wt littermate but the Kctd13 heterozygotes were no longer defective. c In the NOR test, the mutant animals from the Kctd13+/− [non-treated wt (n = 12), treated wt (n = 11), non-treated Kctd13+/− (n = 14) and treated Kctd13+/− (n = 10)] or the 16p11.2 Del/+ model [non-treated wt (n = 17), treated wt (n = 9), non-treated Del/+ (n = 13) and treated Del/+ (n = 13)] were challenged to recognize the new object from the familiar object after a 3 h delay. Kctd13+/− and the Del/+ mutant mice were both impaired to recognize the new object compared to their respective wt littermates in the non-treated group. The fasudil treatment was able to restore the object recognition in the Kctd13+/− line (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001)

Molecular analyses of RHOA/ROCK signalling pathway in the Kctd13 +/− and the 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse models

Then we checked whether the RHOA/ROCK signalling pathway was changed in both 16p11.2 deletion and Kctd13 mouse models. To this end, we first analysed the RHOA protein levels in Kctd13+/− and in 16p11.2 Del/+ individuals and compared them with their respective and wild-type littermates under non-treated and treated conditions [non-treated wt (n = 22), treated wt (n = 11), non-treated Kctd13+/− (n = 21) and treated Kctd13+/− (n = 7); non-treated wt (n = 17), treated wt (n = 8), non-treated Del/+ (n = 11) and treated Del/+ (n = 11)]. Neither the deficiency of Kctd13 nor the loss of one copy of the complete chromosomic region in 16p11.2 Del/+ mice resulted in a change of RHOA or MLC protein levels in the hippocampal region at 18 weeks of age (Fig. 4a, b); nor did it result in a change of the MLC level in Kctd13 and 16p11.2 Del/+ mutants versus their respective wt (Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 4). Nevertheless, both models showed an over-activation of the RHOA/ROCK pathway. Indeed, the Myosin Light Chain (MLC), a protein targeted by the RHOA/ROCK pathway, showed increased levels of phosphorylation in the hippocampus of non-treated Kctd13+/− and 16p11.2 Del/+ compared to their respective wt littermates [Kctd13+/− (non-treated wt (n = 21), treated wt (n = 10), non-treated Kctd13+/− (n = 23) and treated Kctd13+/− (n = 9) and Del/+ (non-treated wt (n = 17), treated wt(n = 8), non-treated Del/+ (n = 14) and treated Del/+ (n = 10)] mice, supporting the idea that this pathway could be associated with the cognitive phenotype observed (Fig. 4c, d; Additional file 1: Table 4). Therefore, we verified whether the therapeutic effect of fasudil acted through the inhibition of this RHOA/ROCK signalling pathway. Interestingly, the fasudil treatment reduced MLC phosphorylation levels in Kctd13 mutant individuals (Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance between groups: H(3) = 21.731; p < 0,001; Mann–Whitney test: non treated wt versus non treated Kctd13+/−: p = 0.009; non treated wt versus treated Kctd13+/−: p = 0.702; non treated Kctd13+/− versus treated Kctd13+/−: p = 0.049). As for the Kctd13+/− model, we found that in 16p11.2 deficient mice fasudil restored normal MLC phosphorylation in treated mutant mice but, surprisingly, induced increased MLC phosphorylation in wt mice (Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance between groups: H(3) = 8.457; p = 0.037; Mann–Whitney test: non treated wt versus treated wt: p = 0.008; t test: non treated wt versus non treated Del/+: p = 0.047, non -reated wt versus treated Del/+: p = 0.364).

Fig. 4

Detection of RHOA (a, b) and of the phoshorylated form of MLC (P-MLC, c, d) by western blots in heterozygous Kctd13+/− (a, c) and the 16p11.2 Del/+ (b, d) hippocampal lysates and their control (wt) littermate. a The quantification of the western blot (an example is shown below the graph) revealed no changes in RHOA protein levels in the Kctd13+/− (A) or in the 16p11.2 Del/+, b mutant lines compared to their wt littermates. Fasudil treatment did not cause changes in RHOA protein levels in the two mutant lines [non-treated wt (n = 22), treated wt (n = 11), non-treated Kctd13+/− (n = 21) and treated Kctd13+/− (n = 7); and non-treated wt (n = 17), treated wt (n = 8), non-treated Del/+ (n = 11) and treated Del/+ (n = 11)]. However, Kctd13 deficient mice showed an increase in the levels of phosphorylated MLC protein (c) and the loss of a copy of 16p11.2 region caused an increase in the levels of phosphorylated MLC protein (d). The treatment with fasudil reversed this alteration in Kctd13+/− and in the Del/+ mutant line. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01)


Here, we described the phenotypes of another Kctd13+/− mouse mutant line that replicates some of the defects seen in young mouse models carrying the 16p11.2 BP4-BP5 deletion, and we explored a treatment aimed at reducing the activity of the RHOA/ROCK pathway on cognition. With the new Kctd13+/− mouse line, we were able to detect changes in the NOL and NOR, but no effect on the exploration activity compared to the 16p11.2 Del/+ mouse model. These results are in agreement with a recent study highlighting the role of KCTD13 in the 16p11.2 deletion syndrome [24]. The loss of one copy of Kctd13 gene did not cause alterations on the exploration or vertical activity of mice in the open field test. However, the hemi-deletion of the entire 16p11.2 region induced hyperactivity in these animals. This observation leads us to propose that Kctd13 genetic dosage is not involved in the increased exploration activity associated with 16p11.2 deletion. Accordingly, chronic fasudil administration did not attenuate the hyper locomotion affecting 16p11.2 Del/+ mice. This finding suggests that there could be other genes of the region involved in this phenotype. Consequently, the treatment with an inhibitor of the RHOA/ROCK pathway did not produce any effect on this phenotype.

When we analysed the NOL in Kctd13 mutant mice, we found an impairment in the novelty detection in the NOL test at 12 weeks of age. However, at 18 weeks when we repeated the test, the non-treated mutant mice showed an improved recognition index. This observation may show that either there is a maturation deficit that is recovered in older mice, perhaps through compensatory effects, or there could be an effect in the repetition of the test. We favour the first hypothesis as the NOR/NOL phenotypes in this line were found at both ages in the 16p11.2 deletion. Indeed, we found an NOL deficit for the 16p11.2 Del/+ mice at 12 weeks, and which was still present at 18 weeks, not corrected by chronic administration of fasudil for 5 weeks. Thus, further research will be necessary to analyse how this Kctd13-induced NOL phenotype is rescued in 18-week-old non-treated mice. This finding confirms that the NOL-phenotype associated with the 16p11.2 rearrangement is not completely dependent on Kctd13 dosage. Several genes can contribute to the NOL phenotype on top of the Kctd13 gene. Indeed, loss of the serine/threonine Tao kinase 2 leads to brain and behavioural abnormalities with altered dendritic growth and synaptic connectivity through RHOA signalling [30].

The object recognition memory deficit is one of the most robust and reproducible phenotypes associated with 16p11.2 Del/+ mice [20]. In agreement with previous research, our Kctd13+/− mouse model has deficits in novelty detection. Furthermore, our study showed that fasudil treatment significantly rescued this impairment in mutant mice. Thus, the loss of KCTD13 is one of the main drivers of the object recognition phenotype associated with 16p11.2 deletion. In addition, the therapeutic effects of fasudil on Kctd13 deficient and 16p11.2 deletion mice highlight the role of the RHOA/ROCK signalling pathway as the main mechanism responsible for this phenotype.

Interestingly, individuals lacking the Kctd13 gene showed no change in expression levels of the RHOA protein and fasudil treatment did not modify RHOA protein expression in mutant and control mice. Likewise, the carriers of the 16p11.2 hemi-deletion did not display changes of expression for this protein. Although we were not able to detect a change in the RHOA protein level, Kctd13 mutants and 16p11.2 deficient mice had increased phosphorylated-MLC levels. This observation confirms that RHOA/ROCK pathway outcome is over-activated due to a copy loss of Kctd13 in Kctd13 and 16p11.2 mutants. Furthermore, our study showed that the therapeutic effect of fasudil on the recognition memory phenotype associated with 16p11.2 deletion was somehow due to the normalizing action of the drug in both mouse models.

At this point, we can highlight the clinical relevance of the treatment because of its potential as a cognitive enhancer in humans with memory and learning dysfunction related to neurodevelopmental disorders. However, more work is necessary to understand the precise molecular mechanism affected by the loss of the Kctd13 gene causing the over-activation of the RHOA/ROCK pathway.

We consider that further biochemical studies of the RHOA/ROCK pathway and the KCTD13-CULLIN3 complex are needed to understand the mechanistic role of the pathway in the syndromes associated with 16p11.2 rearrangements. In addition, our results do not ignore that other genes in the region may act at other levels of the RHOA pathway or at different times in development [30]. Probably, several genes play a similar role, or the expression of a gene may regulate the expression of another gene in the region, considering the high genotypic density of the 16p11.2 interval and the variability of neurological-associated phenotypes [31, 32].


In this study we found some similarities between Kctd13 and 16p11.2 deletion models, not only in terms of phenotypes but also in terms of rescue for the novel object location and object recognition paradigms. This analysis is limited as it was done in a pure genetic background where some of the Del/+ mutants were not viable. Thus, this study was limited to a subset of viable mutant animals carrying the 16p11.2 deletion. We could have improved this because these models can display normal post-natal viability on an F1 genetic background with an additional defect in social behaviour [20]. Nevertheless, we will have to carry out a similar study with the Kctd13 null allele. Overall, this study was performed on a mouse model that replicates only a partial set of features found in humans with 16p11.2 deletion, thus our conclusion only provides a partial response for the human condition.


Here we showed that Kctd13 haploinsufficiency phenocopied the object location and recognition memory deficits seen in the 16p11.2 deletion model but did not change exploration activity in the open field. Treatment of adult mice with fasudil, an inhibitor of RHOA, was able to restore novel object location and recognition memories. Furthermore, fasudil treatment was able to restore the RHOA/ROCK signalling pathway to an almost normal level of phosphorylation of the Myosin Light Chain in the brain.

Availability of data and materials

All the mouse models are available either through the Infrafrontier research infrastructure (16p11.2 deletion,; EM:06,133) or the international mouse phenotyping consortium (Kctd13 mutant, The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.





Myosin light chain


Novel object location


Novel object recognition


Open field


Recognition index




  1. 1.

    Conrad DF, Bird C, Blackburne B, Lindsay S, Mamanova L, Lee C, Turner DJ, Hurles ME. Mutation spectrum revealed by breakpoint sequencing of human germline CNVs. Nat Genet. 2010;42(5):385–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cook EH, Scherer SW. Copy-number variations associated with neuropsychiatric conditions. Nature. 2008;455(7215):919–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nalls MA, Couper DJ, Tanaka T, van Rooij FJ, Chen MH, Smith AV, Toniolo D, Zakai NA, Yang Q, Greinacher A, et al. Multiple loci are associated with white blood cell phenotypes. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002113.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pinto D, Pagnamenta AT, Klei L, Anney R, Merico D, Regan R, Conroy J, Magalhaes TR, Correia C, Abrahams BS, et al. Functional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders. Nature. 2010;466(7304):368–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Conrad DF, Pinto D, Redon R, Feuk L, Gokcumen O, Zhang YJ, Aerts J, Andrews TD, Barnes C, Campbell P, et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature. 2010;464(7289):704–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cooper GM, Coe BP, Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Vu TH, Baker C, Williams C, Stalker H, Hamid R, Hannig V, et al. A copy number variation morbidity map of developmental delay. Nat Genet. 2011;43(9):838–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fernandez BA, Roberts W, Chung B, Weksberg R, Meyn S, Szatmari P, Joseph-George AM, MacKay S, Whitten K, Noble B, et al. Phenotypic spectrum associated with de novo and inherited deletions and duplications at 16p11.2 in individuals ascertained for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. J Med Genetics. 2010;47(3):195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hanson E, Bernier R, Porche K, Jackson FI, Goin-Kochel RP, Snyder LG, Snow AV, Wallace AS, Campe KL, Zhang Y, et al. The cognitive and behavioral phenotype of the 16p11.2 deletion in a clinically ascertained population. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77(9):785–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Marshall CR, Noor A, Vincent JB, Lionel AC, Feuk L, Skaug J, Shago M, Moessner R, Pinto D, Ren Y, et al. Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82(2):477–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Weiss LA, Shen Y, Korn JM, Arking DE, Miller DT, Fossdal R, Saemundsen E, Stefansson H, Ferreira MAR, Green T, et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):667–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zufferey F, Sherr EH, Beckmann ND, Hanson E, Maillard AM, Hippolyte L, Macé A, Ferrari C, Kutalik Z, Andrieux J, et al. A 600 kb deletion syndrome at 16p11.2 leads to energy imbalance and neuropsychiatric disorders. J Med Genet. 2012;49(10):660–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jacquemont S, Reymond A, Zufferey F, Harewood L, Walters RG, Kutalik Z, Martinet D, Shen Y, Valsesia A, Beckmann ND, et al. Mirror extreme BMI phenotypes associated with gene dosage at the chromosome 16p11.2 locus. Nature. 2011;478(7367):97–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Shinawi M, Liu P, Kang S-HL, Shen J, Belmont JW, Scott DA, Probst FJ, Craigen WJ, Graham BH, Pursley A, et al. Recurrent reciprocal 16p11.2 rearrangements associated with global developmental delay, behavioural problems, dysmorphism, epilepsy, and abnormal head size. J Med Genetics. 2010;47(5):332–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    McCarthy SE, Makarov V, Kirov G, Addington AM, McClellan J, Yoon S, Perkins DO, Dickel DE, Kusenda M, Krastoshevsky O, et al. Microduplications of 16p11.2 are associated with schizophrenia. Nat Genetics. 2009;41(11):1223-U1285.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bochukova EG, Huang N, Keogh J, Henning E, Purmann C, Blaszczyk K, Saeed S, Hamilton-Shield J, Clayton-Smith J, O’Rahilly S, et al. Large, rare chromosomal deletions associated with severe early-onset obesity. Nature. 2010;463(7281):666–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Walters RG, Jacquemont S, Valsesia A, de Smith AJ, Martinet D, Andersson J, Falchi M, Chen F, Andrieux J, Lobbens S, et al. A new highly penetrant form of obesity due to deletions on chromosome 16p11.2. Nature. 2010;463(7281):671–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Crepel A, Steyaert J, De la Marche W, De Wolf V, Fryns JP, Noens I, Devriendt K, Peeters H. Narrowing the critical deletion region for autism spectrum disorders on 16p11.2. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2011;156(2):243–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Horev G, Ellegood J, Lerch JP, Son YE, Muthuswamy L, Vogel H, Krieger AM, Buja A, Henkelman RM, Wigler M, et al. Dosage-dependent phenotypes in models of 16p11.2 lesions found in autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(41):17076–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Portmann T, Yang M, Mao R, Panagiotakos G, Ellegood J, Dolen G, Bader PL, Grueter BA, Goold C, Fisher E, et al. Behavioral abnormalities and circuit defects in the basal ganglia of a mouse model of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. Cell Rep. 2014;7(4):1077–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Arbogast T, Ouagazzal AM, Chevalier C, Kopanitsa M, Afinowi N, Migliavacca E, Cowling BS, Birling MC, Champy MF, Reymond A, et al. Reciprocal effects on neurocognitive and metabolic phenotypes in mouse models of 16p11.2 deletion and duplication syndromes. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(2):e1005709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lin GN, Corominas R, Lemmens I, Yang X, Tavernier J, Hill DE, Vidal M, Sebat J, Iakoucheva LM. Spatiotemporal 16p11.2 protein network implicates cortical late mid-fetal brain development and KCTD13-Cul3-RhoA pathway in psychiatric diseases. Neuron. 2015;85(4):742–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Golzio C, Willer J, Talkowski ME, Oh EC, Taniguchi Y, Jacquemont S, Reymond A, Sun M, Sawa A, Gusella JF, et al. KCTD13 is a major driver of mirrored neuroanatomical phenotypes of the 16p11.2 copy number variant. Nature. 2012;485(7398):363–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Escamilla CO, Filonova I, Walker AK, Xuan ZX, Holehonnur R, Espinosa F, Liu S, Thyme SB, López-García IA, Mendoza DB, et al. Kctd13 deletion reduces synaptic transmission via increased RhoA. Nature. 2017;551(7679):227–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Arbogast T, Razaz P, Ellegood J, McKinstry SU, Erdin S, Currall B, Aneichyk T, Lerch JP, Qiu LR, Rodriguiz RM, et al. Kctd13-deficient mice display short-term memory impairment and sex-dependent genetic interactions. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(9):1474–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Meziane H, Khelfaoui M, Morello N, Hiba B, Calcagno E, Reibel-Foisset S, Selloum M, Chelly J, Humeau Y, Riet F, et al. Fasudil treatment in adult reverses behavioural changes and brain ventricular enlargement in Oligophrenin-1 mouse model of intellectual disability. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(11):2314–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    van Strien NM, Cappaert NLM, Witter MP. The anatomy of memory: an interactive overview of the parahippocampal-hippocampal network. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(4):272–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Birling MC, Schaeffer L, André P, Lindner L, Maréchal D, Ayadi A, Sorg T, Pavlovic G, Hérault Y. Efficient and rapid generation of large genomic variants in rats and mice using CRISMERE. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Karp NA, Meehan TF, Morgan H, Mason JC, Blake A, Kurbatova N, Smedley D, Jacobsen J, Mott RF, Iyer V, et al. Applying the ARRIVE guidelines to an in vivo database. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(5):e1002151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Richter M, Murtaza N, Scharrenberg R, White SH, Johanns O, Walker S, Yuen RKC, Schwanke B, Bedurftig B, Henis M, et al. Altered TAOK2 activity causes autism-related neurodevelopmental and cognitive abnormalities through RhoA signaling. Molecular Psychiatry. 2019;24(9):1329–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jensen M, Girirajan S. An interaction-based model for neuropsychiatric features of copy-number variants. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(1):e1007879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Girirajan S, Rosenfeld JA, Coe BP, Parikh S, Friedman N, Goldstein A, Filipink RA, McConnell JS, Angle B, Meschino WS, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity of genomic disorders and rare copy-number variants. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1321–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to the animal caretakers for their services at PHENOMIN-ICS and to the members of the team and the staff of the IGBMC laboratory for their helpful suggestions and discussions.


This work was supported by the National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM), the University of Strasbourg (Unistra), and French state funds through the “Agence Nationale de la Recherche” under the framework programme Investissements d’Avenir labelled ANR-10-IDEX-0002–02, ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT, ANR-10-INBS-07 PHENOMIN to YH and support from the “Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale” to SML. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




SML, MCB, YH: contributions to the conception and design of the work; SML, YH: Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; SML, VN, CC, YH: contribution to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; SML, VN, CC, MCB, YH: Final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yann Herault.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Experimental procedures involving animals were approved by the Ministry of National Education, Higher Education and Research, and with the agreement of the local ethics committee Com’Eth (no.17) under the accreditation number APAFIS#3590-2016011510199843 v4 with YH as the principal investigator (accreditation 67-369).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Supplementary data.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin Lorenzo, S., Nalesso, V., Chevalier, C. et al. Targeting the RHOA pathway improves learning and memory in adult Kctd13 and 16p11.2 deletion mouse models. Molecular Autism 12, 1 (2021).

Download citation


  • Copy number variation
  • Neurodevelopment
  • Intellectual disability
  • Autism spectrum disorders
  • KCTD13
  • Mouse model
  • Recognition memory
  • Preclinical treatment