Open Access

Impairment of fragile X mental retardation protein-metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 signaling and its downstream cognates ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1, amyloid beta A4 precursor protein, striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase, and homer 1, in autism: a postmortem study in cerebellar vermis and superior frontal cortex

  • SHossein Fatemi1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Timothy D Folsom1,
  • Rachel E Kneeland1,
  • Mahtab K Yousefi1,
  • Stephanie B Liesch1 and
  • Paul D Thuras4
Molecular Autism20134:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-2392-4-21

Received: 4 January 2013

Accepted: 14 May 2013

Published: 26 June 2013

Abstract

Background

Candidate genes associated with idiopathic forms of autism overlap with other disorders including fragile X syndrome. Our laboratory has previously shown reduction in fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and increase in metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) in cerebellar vermis and superior frontal cortex (BA9) of individuals with autism.

Methods

In the current study we have investigated expression of four targets of FMRP and mGluR5 signaling - homer 1, amyloid beta A4 precursor protein (APP), ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC1), and striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) - in the cerebellar vermis and superior frontal cortex (BA9) via SDS-PAGE and western blotting. Data were analyzed based on stratification with respect to age (children and adolescents vs. adults), anatomic region of the brain (BA9 vs. cerebellar vermis), and impact of medications (children and adolescents on medications (n = 4) vs. total children and adolescents (n = 12); adults on medications (n = 6) vs. total adults (n = 12)).

Results

There were significant increases in RAC1, APP 120 kDa and APP 80 kDa proteins in BA9 of children with autism vs. healthy controls. None of the same proteins were significantly affected in cerebellar vermis of children with autism. In BA9 of adults with autism there were significant increases in RAC1 and STEP 46 kDa and a significant decrease in homer 1 vs. controls. In the vermis of adult subjects with autism, RAC1 was significantly increased while APP 120, STEP 66 kDa, STEP 27 kDa, and homer 1 were significantly decreased when compared with healthy controls. No changes were observed in vermis of children with autism. There was a significant effect of anticonvulsant use on STEP 46 kDa/β-actin and a potential effect on homer 1/NSE, in BA9 of adults with autism. However, no other significant confound effects were observed in this study.

Conclusions

Our findings provide further evidence of abnormalities in FMRP and mGluR5 signaling partners in brains of individuals with autism and open the door to potential targeted treatments which could help ameliorate the symptoms of autism.

Keywords

Autism RAC1 Homer 1 APP STEP BA9 Cerebellar vermis Children Adults

Background

Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is characterized by impairments in social reciprocal interaction, communication, and repetitive and stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests, and activities [1]. A number of neuropathologic abnormalities have been characterized in brains from individuals with autism including macrocephaly, volumetric and cellular abnormalities of the frontal cortex, parietal cortex, the limbic structures, and cerebellum, and cortical minicolumnar disorganization [24]. Recently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a prevalence for autism of 11.3 per 1,000 (one in 88) children aged eight years in the United States in 2008 [5]. This represents a 78% increase in incidence over the previously reported finding of 6.4 per 1,000 in 2002 [5].

Beyond core symptoms, people with autism display a number of comorbidities including seizure disorder, intellectual disability, and other cognitive impairments [6]. The presence of seizure disorder has been estimated from 5% to 40% [6]. Epileptiform activity has been shown to cause brief episodes of impaired cognitive function known as transitory cognitive impairment (TCI) [7, 8] and may contribute to cognitive deficits in individuals with autism. Due to the heterogeneous nature of autism spectrum disorders, it is not surprising that multiple gene families have been implicated in the pathology of autism [911] with 50 gene or gene variants accounting for approximately 30% of autism spectrum cases [11]. Many of these candidate genes overlap with those of other disorders with autistic behavioral deficits including tuberous sclerosis [12], fragile X syndrome (FXS) [13], Rett syndrome [14], and Angelman syndrome [15].

There is a wide degree of overlap between behavioral deficits of autism and FXS, the most common inherited form of intellectual disability. Indeed, approximately 25% to 47% of people with FXS display a comorbid diagnosis of autism [16, 17]. Similar to those diagnosed with autism, people diagnosed with FXS display learning deficits, delayed language acquisition, impaired motor skills, and repetitive behavior [18]. FXS is caused by mutations in the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (FMR1) leading ultimately to the loss of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) expression. FMRP binds approximately 4% of all mRNAs expressed in brain [19, 20] and acts primarily as a translational repressor. FMRP is expressed in both glia and neurons [21, 22] and in neurons is highly localized to the dendrites and spines [2325].

FMRP acts as a negative regulator of group I metabotropic glutamate signaling, particularly metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) and it is believed that runaway glutamatergic signaling, particularly in the dendrites, is ultimately responsible for the deficits associated with FXS [26]. An anatomical abnormality of neurons from brains of individuals with FXS, autism, and Fmr1 knockout (KO) mice are dendrites with an overabundance of immature long, thin spines [2729]. The profusion of dendritic spines could lead to an abnormally large amount of synapse formation and result in the cognitive impairments associated with FXS as well autism. In individuals with autism, greater spine density has been correlated with lower cognitive function [29].

We have previously observed reductions in FMRP in the cerebellar vermis and superior frontal cortex (Brodmann Area 9 (BA9)) of adults with autism and increased expression of mGluR5 in the vermis and BA9 of children with autism [30, 31]. These represent the first findings of altered FMRP and mGluR5 in individuals with autism who do not have a comorbid diagnosis of FXS. In the current study, we have expanded upon our initial studies to examine protein expression of four known targets of FMRP and mGluR5 signaling that may play a role in regulating spine density, protein synthesis, and synaptic transmission: homer 1, amyloid beta A4 precursor protein (APP), ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC1), and striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) in the same brain regions. We hypothesized that targets of FMRP would display altered expression, further implicating this signaling pathway in the etiology of autism. Alterations in levels of these targets of FMRP could potentially be corrected therapeutically to ameliorate symptoms of autism.

Methods

Tissue preparation

The Institutional Review Board of the University of Minnesota, School of Medicine approved all experimental procedures for this study. Frozen postmortem blocks of the superior frontal cortex (BA9) and cerebellar vermis were obtained from the NICHD Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD; the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center; the Brain Endowment Bank, Miami, Florida; and the Autism Tissue Program. The tissue samples (Table 1) were prepared as described previously [30, 31] and each sample included both grey and white matter. None of the controls had a history of neuropsychiatric disorders, seizure disorder, or intellectual disability.
Table 1

Demographic data for individuals with autism and controls

Case

Dx

Sex

Age

PMI (hrs)

Ethnicity

Medication history

Cause of death

Seizure

ID

Side of brain

Brain region

UMB-4670

Control

M

4

17

Caucasian

None

Commotio cordis

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

UMB-4898

Control

M

7

12

Caucasian

Methylphenidate; clonidine

Drowning

No

No

Unknown

Vermis

UMB-1674

Control

M

8

36

Caucasian

None

Drowning

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

UMB-4787

Control

M

12

15

African American

Montelukast; albuteral; prednisone, loratadine

Asthma

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

UMB-1823

Control

M

15

18

Caucasian

None

MVA

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

AN17425

Control

M

16

26.16

Unknown

None

Heart attack

No

No

Left

BA9

AN15105

Control

M

18

19.83

Unknown

None

Unknown

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

AN03217

Control

M

19

18.58

Caucasian

None

Pneumonia

No

No

Left

BA9

UMB-1846

Control

F

20

9

Caucasian

None

MVA

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

AN07176

Control

M

21

29.91

Unknown

None

MVA

No

No

Left

BA9

AN14368

Control

M

22

24.2

Unknown

None

Unknown

No

No

Left

BA9

AN19760

Control

M

28

23.25

Unknown

None

Unknown

No

No

Left

BA9

AN15566

Control

F

32

28.92

Unknown

None

Unknown

No

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

UMB-1169

Control

M

33

27

African American

Metoclopramide; loratadine

Dilated cardiomyopathy (morbid obesity)

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

UMB-1376

Control

M

37

12

African American

None

ASCVD

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

AN15151

Control

M

41

30.4

Unknown

None

Heart attack

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

AN19440

Control

F

50

20.25

Unknown

None

Heart attack

No

No

Unknown

BA9

AN12240

Control

M

51

4.75

Caucasian

None

Heart attack

No

No

Right

BA9

AN13295

Control

M

56

22.12

Unknown

None

Unknown

No

No

Right

BA9

AN08873

Autism

M

5

25.5

Caucasian

None

Drowning

No

No

Left

BA9

AN13872

Autism

F

5

32.73

Asian

None

Drowning

No

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

UMB-1349

Autism

M

5

39

Caucasian

None

Drowning

No

No

Unknown

Vermis

UMB-1174

Autism

F

7

14

Caucasian

None

Seizure disorder

Yes

No

Unknown

BA9

UMB-4231

Autism

M

8

12

African American

Olanzapine; galantamine

Drowning

No

Yes

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

AN19511

Autism

M

8

22.16

Caucasian

None

Cancer

Yes

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

UMB-4721

Autism

M

8

16

African American

None

Drowning

No

No

Unknown

Vermis

AN16641

Autism

M

9

27

Caucasian

Carbamazepine; methylphenidate; clonidine

Seizure disorder

Yes

Yes

Left

BA9

AN16115

Autism

F

11

12.88

Caucasian

Carbamazepine; lamotrigine; dextroamphetamine; topiramate

Seizure/drowning

Yes

Yes

Right

Vermis

UMB-4899

Autism

M

14

9

Caucasian

None

Drowning

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

AN17138

Autism

M

16

24

Asian

Fexofenadine; buspirone; topiramate

Seizure disorder

Yes

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

AN01570

Autism

F

18

6.75

Caucasian

None

Seizure disorder

Yes

No

Right

BA9

AN00764

Autism

M

20

23.66

Caucasian

Erythromycin gel; minocycline

MVA

No

Yes

Left

BA9

UMB-1638

Autism

F

20

50

Caucasian

None

Seizure disorder

Yes

Yes

Unknown

BA9

AN09730

Autism

M

22

25

Caucasian

Aripiprazole; lamotrigine; zonisamide

Aspiration

Yes

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

AN08166

Autism

M

29

43.25

Caucasian

Fexofenadine; ziprasidone HCl; carbamazepine

Seizure (suspected)

Yes

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

AN12457

Autism

F

29

17.83

Caucasian

Fluvoxamine

Seizure disorder

Yes

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

AN11989

Autism

M

30

16.06

Caucasian

None

Heart failure (congestive)

No

No

Left

BA9

AN08792

Autism

M

30

20.33

Caucasian

Cisapride; clorazepate; sodium valproate; phenytoin; folic acid; primidone; phenobarbital; omeprazole; metoclopramide

Gastrointestinal bleeding

Yes

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

UMB-5027

Autism

M

37

26

African American

None

Obstruction of bowel due to adhesion

No

No

Unknown

BA9, Vermis

AN06420

Autism

M

39

13.95

Caucasian

None

Cardiac tamponade

No

No

Left

BA9, Vermis

AN14613

Autism

M

39

22.75

Caucasian

None

Sudden unexpected death

Yes

No

Unknown

BA9

AN17777

Autism

F

49

16.33

Caucasian

Wafarin; venlafaxine; erythromycin; lansoprazole; risperidone; metformin; gabapentin; propranolol; levothyroxine

Pulmonary arrest

No

Yes

Left

BA9, Vermis

AN01093

Autism

M

56

19.48

Caucasian

Benztropine mesylate; haloperidol; lithium; chlorpromazine; alprazolam

Anoxic encephalopathy

Yes

No

Right

BA9, Vermis

Children

Control

Autistic

Change

P -value

d

 

Age ± SD (years)

11.4 ± 5.22

9.5 ± 4.38

↓16.6%

ns

nd

 

PMI ± SD (years)

20.6 ± 8.1

20.1 ± 9.94

↓2.4%

ns

nd

 

Gender

7M

8M:4F

nd

nd

nd

 

Adults

Control

Autistic

Change

P- value

d

 

Age ± SD (years)

34.2 ± 13

33.3 ± 11.2

↓2.6%

ns

nd

 

PMI ± SD (years)

20.9 ± 8.41

24.6 ± 11.1

↑17.7%

ns

nd

 

Gender

9M:3F

9M:3F

nd

nd

nd

 

ASCVD, Arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease; Dx, Diagnosis; Hrs, Hours; PMI, Postmortem interval; M, Male; F, Female; EtOH, Alcohol; ID, Intellectual disability; MVA, Motor vehicle accident; nd, Not determined; ns, Not significant; d, Cohen’s test statistic.

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blot analysis

Tissue samples from the cerebellar vermis (vermal lobule unknown) (in adults, n = 5 controls and 8 autistic adults; in children, n = 6 controls and 8 autistic children) and BA9 (in adults, n = 12 controls and 12 autistic adults; in children, n = 6 controls and 9 autistic children) were prepared. Children were defined as those younger than 13 years of age; adolescents were defined as those between the ages of 13 years to 18 years; and adults were defined as those 19 years of age or older. For this study, children and adolescents were grouped together. Samples were mixed with denaturing SDS sample buffer and denatured by heating at 100°C for 5 minutes. SDS-PAGE gels were prepared using standard Laemmli solutions. For experiments involving RAC1 or STEP, 12% resolving gels were used; 10% resolving gels were used for experiments involving homer 1, neuronal specific enolase (NSE), or β-actin, and for experiments involving APP, 6% resolving gels were used. In all cases, 5% stacking gels were used. Thirty μg of protein per lane was loaded onto the gel and electrophoresed for 15 minutes at 75 V followed by 55 minutes at 150 V at room temperature (RT). We minimized interblot variability by including samples from subjects of each group (control and autism) on each gel. Samples were run in duplicate. Proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes for 2 hrs at 300 mAmp at 4°C as previously described [30, 31]. Blots were blocked with 0.2% I-Block (Tropix, Bedford, MA, USA) in PBS with 0.3% Tween 20 for one hour at RT followed by an overnight incubation in primary antibodies at 4°C. The primary antibodies used were: anti-RAC1 (1:500; BD Transduction, San Jose, CA, USA), anti-APP (1:250; Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-homer 1 (1:500; Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan), anti-STEP (1:200; Abgent, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-NSE (1:2,000; Abcam Inc.), and anti-β-actin (1:5,000; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Blots were washed for 30 minutes and incubated in secondary antibodies for one hour at RT as previously described [30, 31]. Secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit IgG (A9169, Sigma Aldrich, 1:80,000) or goat anti-mouse IgG (A9044, Sigma Aldrich, 1:80,000). Blots were washed twice in PBS supplemented with Tween-20 (PBST) and bands were visualized using the ECL plus detection system (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) and exposed to CL-Xposure film (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). The molecular weights of approximately 120 kDa and 88 kDa (APP); 66 kDa, 61 kDa, 46 kDa, 33 kDa, and 27 kDa (STEP); 46 kDa (NSE); 45 kDa (homer 1); 42 kDa (β-actin); and 21 kDa (RAC1) immunoreactive bands were quantified with background subtraction using a RioRad densitometer and BioRad MultiAnalyst software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Results obtained were based on two to four independent experiments.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of protein data was performed as previously described [30, 3234]. The independent samples t-test was used to compare people with autism to healthy controls. Separate analyses were conducted for children and adults. Analysis of covariance was used to estimate the effect of covariates on group comparisons. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d statistic, with values >0.8 considered a large effect [35]. For analysis of confounders, significance was set at P <0.06.

Results

All western blotting results were normalized against β-actin and NSE and are expressed as ratios to β-actin and NSE. In the cerebellar vermis of adults with autism we observed significantly increased expression of the RAC1/β-actin ratio (P <0.025, d = 1.62) and the RAC1/NSE ratio (P <0.016, d = 1.73) (Figures 1 and 2, Table 2). We also observed a significant reduction in expression of the APP 120 kDa/β-actin ratio (P <0.018, d = −2.04) and the APP 120 kDa/NSE ratio (P <0.012, d = −2.40) (Figures 1 and 2, Table 2). Ratios for STEP 66 kDa/β-actin (P <0.023, d = −1.51), STEP 66 kDa/NSE (P <0.018, d = −1.59), STEP 33 kDa/β-actin (P <0.024, d = −1.63) and STEP 33 kDa/NSE (P <0.020, d = −1.68) were significantly reduced in the cerebellar vermis of adults with autism (Figures 1 and 3, Table 2). STEP 27 kDa/NSE was also significantly reduced in the cerebellar vermis of subjects with autism (P <0.038, d = −1.40) (Table 2). We did not observe alterations in levels of homer 1 or APP 88 kDa in the cerebellar vermis of adults with autism and there were no significant changes for any of the proteins in the cerebellar vermis of children with autism (Figures 1, 2, 3, Table 2).
Figure 1

Representative samples of RAC1, APP, Homer 1, STEP, NSE, and β-actin from the cerebellar vermis and BA9 from controls and people with autism. C, controls; A, people with autism; RAC1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; APP, amyloid beta A4 precursor protein; STEP, striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase; NSE, neuronal specific enolase; BA9, Brodmann Area 9.

Figure 2

Expression of RAC1, APP, and homer 1 in the cerebellar vermis of subjects with autism and controls. (A) Mean RAC1/β-actin, APP 120 kDa/β-actin, APP 88/β-actin, and homer 1/β-actin ratios for controls (gray histogram bars) and people with autism (black histogram bars) are shown for the cerebellar vermis. (B) Mean RAC1/NSE, APP 120 kDa/NSE, APP 88/NSE, and homer 1/NSE ratios for controls (gray histogram bars) and people with autism (black histogram bars) are shown for the cerebellar vermis. Error bars express standard error of the mean. *P <0.05. RAC1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; amyloid beta A4 precursor protein; NSE, neuronal specific enolase.

Table 2

Western blotting results for RAC1, homer 1, APP, STEP, NSE, and β-actin and their ratios in the cerebellar vermis a

 

Control

Autistic

Change

P-value

Cohen’s d

Adults

     

RAC1/β-actin

0.315 ± 0.206

1.3 ± 0.714

313%↑

0.025b

1.62b

Homer 1/β-actin

0.237 ± 0.303

0.147 ± 0.147

38%↓

ns

0.42

APP 120 kDa/β-actin

0.091 ± 0.029

0.050 ± 0.016

45%↓

0.018b

−2.04b

APP 88 kDa/β-actin

0.08 ± 0.06

0.03 ± 0.02

63%↓

ns

1.26

STEP 66 kDa/β-actin

0.136 ± 0.116

0.025 ± 0.029

82%↓

0.023b

−1.51b

STEP 61 kDa/β-actin

0.015 ± 0.028

0.003 ± 0.004

80%↓

ns

−0.67

STEP 46 kDa/β-actin

0.03 ± 0.034

0.034 ± 0.041

13%↑

ns

0.11

STEP 33 kDa/β-actin

0.55 ± 0.38

0.17 ± 0.13

69%↓

0.024b

−1.63b

STEP 27 kDa/β-actin

0.70 ± 0.67

0.53 ± 0.39

24%↓

ns

−0.32

β-actin

10.2 ± 1.67

9.06 ± 3.1

11%↓

ns

nd

Children

     

RAC1/β-actin

1.09 ± 0.545

1.1 ± 0.471

0.9%↑

ns

0.01

Homer 1/β-actin

0.188 ± 0.13

0.218 ± 0.109

16%↑

ns

0.26

APP 120 kDa/β-actin

0.071 ± 0.029

0.077 ± 0.033

8.4%↑

ns

0.19

APP 88 kDa/β-actin

0.084 ± 0.055

0.100 ± 0.071

19%↑

ns

0.25

STEP 66 kDa/β-actin

0.01 ± 0.008

0.059 ± 0.091

490%↑

ns

0.64

STEP 61 kDa/β-actin

0.002 ± 0.002

0.023 ± 0.031

1050%↑

ns

1.15

STEP 46 kDa/β-actin

0.0022 ± 0.0011

0.024 ± 0.024

991%↑

ns

1.16

STEP 33 kDa/β-actin

0.057 ± 0.085

0.13 ± 0.17

128%↑

ns

0.51

STEP 27 kDa/β-actin

0.70 ± 0.68

0.53 ± 0.38

24%↓

ns

−0.72

β-actin

9.48 ± 1.11

9.52 ± 3.71

0.4%↑

ns

nd

Adults

     

RAC1/NSE

0.23 ± 0.16

0.93 ± 0.49

304%↑

0.016b

1.73b

Homer 1/NSE

0.18 ± 0.24

0.099 ± 0.11

45%↓

ns

−0.46

APP 120 kDa/NSE

0.062 ± 0.021

0.031 ± 0.008

50%↓

0.012b

−2.40b

APP 88 kDa/NSE

0.06 ± 0.05

0.02 ± 0.01

67%↓

ns

−1.22

STEP 66 kDa/NSE

0.18 ± 0.14

0.032 ± 0.04

82%↓

0.018b

−1.59b

STEP 61 kDa/NSE

0.018 ± 0.035

0.004 ± 0.005

78%↓

ns

−0.21

STEP 46 kDa/NSE

0.039 ± 0.041

0.037 ± 0.042

5.1%↓

ns

−0.59

STEP 33 kDa/NSE

0.72 ± 0.49

0.21 ± 0.17

71%↓

0.020b

−1.68b

STEP 27 kDa/NSE

1.27 ± 0.82

0.44 ± 0.38

65%↓

0.038b

−1.40b

NSE

7.42 ± 1.26

7.69 ± 1.3

3.6%↑

ns

nd

Children

     

RAC1/NSE

0.84 ± 0.51

0.69 ± 0.23

18%↓

ns

−0.38

Homer 1/NSE

0.13 ± 0.09

0.16 ± 0.07

23%↑

ns

0.33

APP 120 kDa/NSE

0.040 ± 0.025

0.056 ± 0.021

40%↑

ns

0.70

APP 88 kDa/NSE

0.054 ± 0.025

0.072 ± 0.053

33%↑

ns

0.42

STEP 66 kDa/NSE

0.014 ± 0.011

0.102 ± 0.165

628%↑

ns

0.61

STEP 61 kDa/NSE

0.0024 ± 0.001

0.037 ± 0.054

1441%↑

ns

0.96

STEP 46 kDa/NSE

0.003 ± 0.002

0.03 ± 0.047

900%↑

ns

1.02

STEP 33 kDa/NSE

0.078 ± 0.12

0.23 ± 0.33

194%↑

ns

0.55

STEP 27 kDa/NSE

0.36 ± 0.24

0.99 ± 0.93

175%↑

ns

0.77

NSE

6.97 ± 0.84

6.23 ± 1.53

10.6%↓

ns

nd

Values for control and autistic groups are presented as mean ± SD aRAC1, ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; APP, amyloid beta A4 precursor protein; STEP, striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase; NSE, neuronal specific enolase; nd, not determined; ns, not significant. bStatistically significant.

Figure 3

Expression of STEP in the cerebellar vermis and BA9 of subjects with autism and controls. Control group data are presented as gray histogram bars; autistic group data are presented as black histogram bars. (A) and (F) STEP 66 kDa. (B) and (G) STEP 61 kDa. (C) and (H) STEP 46 kDa. (D) and (I). STEP 33 kDa. (F) and (J) STEP 27 kDa. Error bars express standard error of the mean. *P <0.05. STEP, striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase; NSE, neuronal specific enolase; BA9, Brodmann Area 9.

In BA9 of adults with autism we observed significantly increased ratios for RAC1/β-actin (P <0.031, d = 1.32), RAC1/NSE (P <0.042, d = 1.24) and significantly reduced ratios for homer 1/β-actin (P <0.027, d = −1.37), homer 1/NSE (P <0.020, d = −1.43) (Figures 1 and 4, Table 3). STEP 46 kDa/β-actin ratio (P <0.012, d = 1.10) and STEP 46 kDa/NSE ratio (P <0.020, d = 1.02) were significantly increased in BA9 of adults with autism (Figures 1 and 3, Table 3). In BA9 of children with autism we observed significant increases in ratios for RAC1/β-actin (P <0.008, d = 2.74), RAC1/NSE (P <0.017, d = 2.09), APP 120 kDa/β-actin (P <0.032, d = 2.03), APP 120 kDa/NSE (P <0.017, d = 2.12), APP 88 kDa/β-actin (P <0.025, d = 2.54) and APP 88 kDa/NSE (P <0.012, d = 3.24) (Figures 1 and 4, Table 3). Finally, there was a significant reduction in STEP 61 kDa/β-actin ratio (P <0.036, d = −1.23) in BA9 of children with autism (Figures 1 and 3, Table 3).
Figure 4

Expression of RAC1, APP, and homer 1 in BA9 of subjects with autism and controls. (A) Mean RAC1/β-actin, APP 120 kDa/β-actin, APP 88/β-actin, and homer 1/β-actin ratios for controls (gray histogram bars) and people with autism (black histogram bars) are shown for BA9. (B) Mean RAC1/NSE, APP 120 kDa/NSE, APP 88/NSE, and homer 1/NSE ratios for controls (gray histogram bars) and people with autism (black histogram bars) are shown for BA9. Error bars express standard error of the mean. *P <0.05. RAC1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; amyloid beta A4 precursor protein; NSE, neuronal specific enolase; BA9, Brodmann Area 9.

Table 3

Western blotting results for RAC1, homer 1, APP, STEP, NSE, and β-actin and their ratios in BA9 a

 

Control

Autistic

Change

P-value

Cohen’s d

Adults

     

RAC1/β-actin

0.834 ± 0.554

1.66 ± 0.65

99%↑

0.031b

1.32b

Homer 1/β-actin

0.512 ± 0.152

0.324± 0.132

37%↓

0.027b

−1.37b

APP 120 kDa/β-actin

0.41 ± 0.23

0.45 ± 0.24

9.8%↑

ns

0.17

APP 88 kDa/β-actin

0.46 ± 0.19

0.53 ± 0.24

15%↑

ns

0.29

STEP 66 kDa/β-actin

0.10 ± 0.07

0.09 ± 0.08

10%↓

ns

−0.11

STEP 61 kDa/β-actin

0.73 ± 0.17

0.74 ± 0.18

1.3%↑

ns

0.08

STEP 46 kDa/β-actin

0.0097 ± 0.006

0.035 ± 0.031

261%↑

0.012b

1.10

STEP 33 kDa/β-actin

0.20 ± 0.13

0.18 ± 0.09

10%↓

ns

−0.25

STEP 27 kDa/β-actin

0.20 ± 0.12

0.16 ± 0.12

20%↓

ns

−0.29

β-actin

13.2 ± 2.41

13.1 ± 2.31

0.75%↓

ns

nd

Children

     

RAC1/β-actin

1 ± 0.616

2.8 ± 0.7

180%↑

0.008b

2.74b

Homer 1/β-actin

0.46 ± 0.17

0.77 ± 0.31

67%↑

ns

1.21

APP 120 kDa/β-actin

0.20 ± 0.07

0.63 ± 0.25

215%↑

0.032b

2.03b

APP 88 kDa/β-actin

0.22 ± 0.03

0.75 ± 0.26

241%↑

0.025b

2.54b

STEP 66 kDa/β-actin

0.027 ± 0.026

0.043 ± 0.031

59%↑

ns

0.54

STEP 61 kDa/β-actin

0.59 ± 0.22

0.29 ± 0.24

51%↓

0.036b

−1.23b

STEP 46 kDa/β-actin

0.008 ± 0.006

0.013 ± 0.014

62%↑

ns

0.45

STEP 33 kDa/β-actin

0.017 ± 0.026

0.033 ± 0.023

94%↑

ns

0.64

STEP 27 kDa/β-actin

0.17 ± 0.17

0.23 ± 0.10

35%↑

ns

0.45

β-actin

11.5 ± 1.31

11.7 ± 2.05

1.7%↑

ns

nd

Adults

     

RAC1/NSE

0.50 ± 0.33

0.95 ± 0.37

90%↑

0.042b

1.24

Homer 1/NSE

0.34 ± 0.12

0.19 ± 0.10

44%↓

0.020b

−1.43

APP 120 kDa/NSE

0.25 ± 0.12

0.27 ± 0.16

8%↑

ns

0.16

APP 88 kDa/NSE

0.28 ± 0.07

0.32 ± 0.14

14%↑

ns

0.27

STEP 66 kDa/NSE

0.17 ± 0.13

0.14 ± 0.12

18%↓

ns

−0.35

STEP 61 kDa/NSE

1.3 ± 0.34

1.18 ± 0.33

9.2%↓

ns

−0.25

STEP 46 kDa/NSE

0.017 ± 0.011

0.048 ± 0.041

182%↑

0.020b

1.02b

STEP 33 kDa/NSE

0.35 ± 0.20

0.28 ± 0.14

20%↓

ns

−0.46

STEP 27 kDa/NSE

0.35 ± 0.21

0.25 ± 0.17

29%↓

ns

−0.53

NSE

9.14 ± 3.73

8.59 ± 1.41

6%↓

ns

nd

Children

     

RAC1/NSE

0.61 ± 0.42

1.33 ± 0.21

118%↑

0.017b

2.09b

Homer 1/NSE

0.28 ± 0.11

0.40 ± 0.15

43%↑

ns

0.94

APP 120 kDa/NSE

0.12 ± 0.04

0.33 ± 0.12

175%↑

0.017b

2.12b

APP 88 kDa/NSE

0.13 ± 0.004

0.39 ± 0.11

200%↑

0.012b

3.24b

STEP 66 kDa/NSE

0.072 ± 0.081

0.097 ± 0.072

34%↑

ns

0.33

STEP 61 kDa/NSE

1.03 ± 0.25

0.69 ± 0.60

33%↓

ns

−0.68

STEP 46 kDa/NSE

0.021 ± 0.021

0.030 ± 0.033

43%↑

ns

0.37

STEP 33 kDa/NSE

0.050 ± 0.083

0.075 ± 0.054

50%↑

ns

0.37

STEP 27 kDa/NSE

0.49 ± 0.57

0.50 ± 0.26

2%↑

ns

0.031

NSE

6.58 ± 2.48

5.63 ± 1.3

14%↓

ns

nd

Values for control and autistic groups are presented as mean ± SD.aRAC1, ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; APP, amyloid beta A4 precursor protein; STEP, striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase; NSE, neuronal specific enolase; BA9, Brodmann’s area 9; nd, not determined; ns, not significant. bStatistically significant.

In adults, we examined ethnicity, postmortem interval (PMI), intellectual disability, history of seizures, antidepressant, antipsychotic drug (APD), and anticonvulsant use in relation to the outcome measures. PMI, gender and intellectual disability were not significantly related to any of the values expressed as ratios of β-actin or NSE. Adults using anticonvulsants displayed significantly higher STEP 46 kDa/β-actin than all adults who did not use anticonvulsants (including autistic as well as nonautistic) (t(22) = 5.23, P <0.001). Adults with autism who were taking anticonvulsants displayed significantly increased expression of STEP 46 kDa/β-actin versus adults with autism who were not taking anticonvulsants (t(10) = 2.85, P <0.017). Moreover, adults with autism who were taking anticonvulsants displayed significantly increased expression of STEP 46 kDa/β-actin than adult controls (t(15) = 5.28, P <0.001). Finally, there was no significant difference in STEP 46 kDa/β-actin when adult controls were compared against adults with autism who were not taking anticonvulsants (t(17) = 1.44, P <0.17). Increased STEP 46 kDa expression was only seen in ratios compared to β-actin but not NSE, indicating that the difference was not specific to neuronal cells. By the same token, STEP 46 kDa/β-actin value in BA9 was also significantly different in those with seizure history versus those without (t(22) = 3.00, P <0.007). However, no significant difference existed between values in adults with autism with seizure disorder versus adults with autism who did not have seizure disorder, nullifying this association (mean 0.043 ± 0.034 versus 0.023 ± 0.027, P <0.29). Adults with autism who were taking anticonvulsants displayed significantly lower homer 1/NSE in BA9 than controls and adults with autism who were not taking anticonvulsants (t(15) = 2.69, P <0.017). While a comparison of homer 1/NSE values between adults with autism who took anticonvulsants (mean of 0.13 ± 0.086) versus those who did not (mean of 0.23 ± 0.085) did not show a significant difference (P <0.063), it is possible that the reduction of homer 1/NSE is at least partly due to anticonvulsant use.

For those using APDs, there were significantly reduced expression of APP 120 kDa/NSE in BA9 (t(15) = 2.20, P <0.044), APP 88 kDa/NSE in BA9 (t(14) = 2.63, P <0.02), and STEP 33 kDa/β-actin (t(22) = 2.18, P <0.040). However, none of these values showed any significant changes in adults with autism when compared with controls (P <0.8, P <0.55, and P <0.55, respectively). STEP 46 kDa/β-actin was significantly higher (t(22) = 2.79, P <0.011) in BA9 in subjects who took APD medication than in those who did not. However, comparison of values for STEP 46 kDa/β-actin in BA9 between subjects with autism taking APDs versus subjects with autism who did not take APDs was not statistically significant (mean 0.051 ± 0.031 versus 0.027 ± 0.03, respectively, P <0.22). For antidepressant use, the single individual taking antidepressants displayed significantly higher expression of APP 88 kDa/NSE in BA9 than the others (t(14) = 2.51, P <0.025) but this difference only reflects change in one subject and is not extendable to the whole group and thus, not amenable to statistical testing. There was a confounding effect of gender on homer 1/NSE in BA9 of adults (t(14) = 2.04, P <0.060). There was a significant reduction in homer 1/NSE in BA9 of adults with autism versus controls (P <0.020) (see Table 3). The mean for male subjects with autism was 0.262 ± 0.081 and the mean for female subjects with autism was 0.417 ± 0.15 (P <0.061), which was not significantly different. Due to having only two subjects for comparison, we were unable to compare female controls with female autistic subjects. Comparing male controls to male autistic subjects resulted in a significant reduction, similar to that reported in Table 3. It is therefore unlikely that gender has a meaningful effect on homer 1/NSE values. There was also a significantly higher expression of RAC1/NSE in Caucasian than African American subjects in BA9 (t(11) = 2.86, P <0.016). However, this comparison is not relevant as the African American sample size numbered only two subjects. Finally, there was an impact of anticonvulsant use on APP 88 kDa/NSE in BA9 of adults (t(14) = 2.12, P <0.052). However, there was no significant difference between adults with autism versus controls for APP 88 kDa/NSE in BA9 of adults, so this is not meaningful.

For children, ethnicity (Caucasian versus African American), history of seizures, antidepressant, APD, and anticonvulsant use were not significantly related to any of the β-actin or NSE measures. There was significant positive correlation between PMI and APP 88 kDa/NSE in BA9 of children (R = 0.734, P <0.060). However, PMI was not significantly different between control or autistic children in BA9, so this finding is not meaningful. For gender, one female subject displayed significantly higher APP 120 kDa/NSE in BA9 than male subjects (t(6) = 3.16, P <0.02). However, this significance could not be linked to a group of subjects, and thus, was not amenable to further statistical testing. Those with intellectual disability had significantly higher ratios on STEP 46 kDa/β-actin BA9 (t(13) = 2.81, P <0.015]. However, STEP 46 kDa/β-actin in BA9 was not significantly different between controls and those with autism.

To further investigate the effect of medications on our results we performed a second analysis comparing controls to people with autism who were not taking medication (Additional files 1: Table S1 and Additional file 2: Table S2). In the cerebellar vermis of adults, RAC1/NSE and RAC1/β-actin remained significant (Additional file 1: Table S1). In BA9 of adults, RAC1/NSE and RAC1/β-actin remained significant as did RAC1/β-actin in children along with APP 120 kDa/NSE, APP 120 kDa/β-actin, APP 88 kDa/NSE and APP 88 kDa/β-actin (Additional file 2: Table S2). Omitting people with autism who were on medication reduced the total number available for analysis so that seven comparisons could no longer be made, and in fifteen comparisons with a sample of three subjects for people with autism, power was reduced thus, affecting statistical significance.

Finally, we tested to see if there were statistical correlations between levels of FMRP or mGluR5 that we had previously reported [30, 31] and levels of RAC1, STEP 66 kDa, STEP 61 kDa, STEP 46 kDa, STEP 33 kDa, STEP 27 kDa, APP120 kDa, APP 88 kDa, or homer 1. We did not find any significant statistical correlation for either FMRP or mGluR5 with any of the targets investigated in the current study (data not shown).

Discussion

The current studies demonstrated abnormal expression of several downstream biochemical targets of FMRP and mGluR5-mediated signaling in the brains of children and adults with autism. The most salient results included: 1) upregulation of RAC1 in BA9 and the vermis of adults with autism, and in BA9 only among children with autism; 2) upregulation of APP120 and 88 kDa species in BA9 of children with autism and downregulation of APP 120 kDa in the vermis of adults with autism; 3) upregulation of STEP 46 kDa in BA9 and downregulation of STEP 66 kDa, 33 kDa, and 27 kDa in the vermis of adults with autism; 4) downregulation of STEP 61 kDa in BA9 of children with autism; and 5) downregulation of homer 1 in BA9 of adults with autism. We observed more significant effects in BA9 than in the cerebellar vermis, consistent with previous findings in autism [36]. The results summarized above will be discussed further and the significant involvement of these proteins in autism will be analyzed in the following paragraphs.

RAC1 is a member of the Rho family of GTPases, a subfamily of the RAS superfamily of small guanine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins. Molecules in this superfamily regulate a number of cellular processes including kinase activation, cytoskeletal rearrangement, cell growth, differentiation, and survival [37]. Members of the Rho family have been implicated in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and regulation of gene expression [37]. RAC1 is involved in remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton [38] and plays an important role in the formation and maturation of dendritic spines as well as regulation of spine density and morphology [3943]. Mutations in the Rho GTPase pathway and their regulators have been involved in intellectual disability-related disorders [43]. For example, RAC1 partners with oligophrenin-1 and synaptojanin which have been linked to X-linked intellectual disability and Down’s syndrome, respectively [4345]. Overexpression of RAC1 in cultured hippocampal neurons younger than 11 days in vitro resulted in the formation of dendritic spines, clustering of 2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2- oxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid (AMPA) receptors and increased the amplitude of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents, suggesting that RAC1 also enhances excitatory synaptic transmission [42].

RAC1 has been shown to interact with FMRP via cytoplasmic FMRP interacting proteins (CYFIP1/2) [46, 47]. RAC1-induced actin remodeling is altered in mouse fibroblasts that lack FMRP, suggesting a role for FMRP in modulating actin dynamics [48]. More recently, RAC1 expression has been demonstrated to be increased in the hippocampus, cortex, brainstem, and cerebella of Fmr1 KO mice suggesting that FMRP acts as a negative regulator of RAC1 [49]. Our results of increased expression of RAC1 in the cerebellar vermis and BA9 of adults with autism, and in BA9 of children with autism, are novel and have never previously been reported in human postmortem brains of subjects with autism; they may be the result of reduced expression of FMRP in the same regions [30, 31], and they mirror the same findings in Fmr1 KO mice. The overexpression of RAC1, particularly in BA9, may suggest increased excitatory signaling, which could impact synaptic transmission and ultimately cognitive function. This is especially true as studies using transgenic mice with a constitutively active form of RAC1 show overproduction of small abnormal supernumerary spines [43, 50, 51], indicating that overproduction of RAC1 in BA9 of both children and adults with autism is evidence of overabundance of active and abnormal neuronal spines in the brains of people with autism examined in this study. There is evidence in the literature that RAC1 may stimulate stellation of primary astrocytes [52] and increase migration of astrocytes [53]. Additionally, some residual RAC1 mRNA and protein activity has been detected in glial cells [49]. It is tempting to speculate that RAC1 overexpression in autism may also be responsible for increased glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunoreactivity detected in the brains of subjects with autism [54]. Higher levels of RAC1 in Caucasian adults with autism compared to African American adults with autism is a novel finding that requires further investigation, and it may be due to genetic or epigenetic factors.

Studies have demonstrated significantly elevated levels of secreted APP and its cleavage products, including beta amyloid (Aβ), in individuals with autism [5557]. Our current results, particularly the increased expression of APP 120 kDa and 88 kDa in BA9 of children with autism, verify these earlier findings. Children with severe autism and aggression have been shown to express at least twice as much APP when compared with control children and four times as much APP when compared to children with mild autism [55]. APP translation is normally repressed by FMRP, and mGluR5 activation releases this repression, which may explain why APP increases are seen only in children and not adults [58, 59]. In support of this, levels of mGluR5 were also elevated in the same specimens as previously reported [30, 31], further buttressing the notion that activation of mGluR5 in children may be the cause of our observed increases in APP 88 and 120 kDa. Antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs can affect levels of APP [60, 61]. However, this scenario is unlikely, as evaluation of the impact of these medications on APP values proved not to be meaningful. APP is present presynaptically in the active zone where it has multiple potential interaction partners, including synaptic vesicle proteins, transporters and channels, and cell adhesion molecules [62]. APP is also present postsynaptically where it has been shown to coprecipitate with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) subunits [63], and may be involved in surface trafficking of NMDARs [64, 65]. Thus, altered expression of APP may result in altered NMDA signaling, which is crucial for learning and memory. In Fmr1 KO mice, there are excess levels of secreted APP [59]. This excess of APP may result in decreased neural pruning and increased neural proliferation, helping to account for the presence of long, immature dendrites of neurons from patients with autism and FXS [59]. In Fmr1 KO mice that have been engineered to remove one App allele, there is a significant reduction in expression of Aβ and multiple phenotypes of FXS, including the presence of audiogenic seizures, the ratio of immature dendritic spines to mature spines, and long-term depression, were partially or fully corrected after removal of the App allele [66]. While the presence of APP in this report probably reflects neuronal activity, increases in brain APP have also been correlated with increased GFAP in both Alzheimer’s disease [67] and autism [54] and these could also reflect glial activity.

STEP is a phosphatase that is implicated in multiple cellular processes. Kim et al. [68] have found increased tyrosine phosphatase activity in response to mGluR5 stimulation in Fmr1 KO mice, leading to reduced phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), molecules implicated in induction and maintenance of synaptic plasticity [69]. This tyrosine phosphatase is thought to be STEP, as STEP translation is initiated in response to mGluR stimulation [70]. Alternative splicing of the protein tyrosine phosphatase, nonreceptor type 5 (PTPN5) gene, which encodes STEP, produces four isoforms, however, only two - STEP 61 kDa and STEP 46 kDa - have phosphatase activity [71, 72]. STEP 61 kDa is primarily membrane-bound and expressed in the postsynaptic density extrasynaptic sites, and the endoplasmic reticulum [73]. STEP 46 kDa is primarily cytosolic [73]. Other isoforms of STEP include STEP 66 kDa, STEP 27 kDa, and STEP 33 kDa. STEP 33 kDa is a cleavage product of STEP 61 kDa [74]. Recent investigations have implicated STEP in the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders [74]. Carty et al. [75] reported significant increases in STEP 61 kDa in the anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices of subjects with schizophrenia. STEP has roles in mediating NMDA and AMPA receptor endocytosis [70, 76], suggesting that it has a role in mGluR5-mediated long-term depression (LTD), a phenomenon that is enhanced in Fmr1 KO mice [77].

Basal levels of STEP are elevated in Fmr1 KO mice [73]. Recent studies have shown that genetic reduction of STEP improves cognition, synaptic plasticity, and NMDA receptor subunit expression in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease [78] and reduced seizures, anti-social, and anxiety-related behaviors in Fmr1 KO mice [73]. We observed reduced expression patterns for STEP 66 kDa, 61 kDa, 33 kDa, and 27 kDa with only STEP 46 kDa showing a significant increase in BA9 of adults with autism. As there was an increase in one of the active forms of STEP and a decrease in the other active form, further experiments are needed to determine what role STEP might play in the pathology of autism. However, nonsignificant trends for increase in several isoforms of STEP were observed in the vermis of both children and adults with autism, with large effect sizes. Thus, it is possible that these increases are due to compensatory processes in response to reductions observed in FMRP. Evaluation of the impact of various confounders such as APDs, anticonvulsant drugs, and seizure disorder on STEP values did not prove to be meaningful, with the exception of an anticonvulsant effect on STEP46 kDa/β-actin in BA9. Data from Hasegawa et al. [79] show there is also minimal presence of STEP 46 kDa in reactive astrocytes of gerbil hippocampi and STEP 46 kDa/NSE data reflect STEP 46 kDa species in neuronal cells, which do not show any association with anticonvulsant use. However, evidence for seizure increasing STEP expression remains controversial [73, 80], Thus, one cannot rule out the possibility of multiple factors modulating the levels of STEP molecules [75].

Homer 1 is a postsynaptic density (PSD) scaffolding protein that interacts with mGluR5 to anchor it in the postsynaptic membrane by linking mGluRs with inositol triphosphate, Shank, and PSD-95/Guanylate kinase associated protein (GKAP) [81, 82]. Giuffrida et al. [83] found that in the postsynaptic membrane of neurons from Fmr1 KO mice there was a reduction of mGluR5 in the insoluble fraction of the membrane as well as a reduction in phosphorylated homer 1. The interaction between homer 1 and mGluR5 regulates the cell surface expression, lateral mobility, and signaling of mGluRs [8487]. Moreover, disruption of homer 1-mGluR5 interactions blocks mGluR5-induced long-term depression and protein synthesis in wild-type animals but not in Fmr1 KO mice [87]. The authors suggest that in Fmr1 KO mice, interactions between homer 1 and mGluR5 are sufficiently reduced for homer 1 to no longer have a role in the regulation of synaptic plasticity [87]. The observed reduction in homer 1 expression in BA9 of adults with autism may have functional consequences resulting in altered glutamatergic expression and cognitive deficits associated with both FXS and autism. A recent report [88] showed that homer 1 is a risk gene in autism, thus validating our novel finding. Recent evidence indicates that treatment with lithium or valproic acid causes reductions in expression of homer 1b/1c [89]. Thus, we cannot rule out a potential confounding effect of anticonvulsant drug use on homer 1/NSE in BA9 of adults, consistent with this previous finding.

Reduced FMRP expression has also been shown to cause reduction in expression of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor subunits (α1, α3, α4, β1, β2, β3, γ1, γ2, δ) in Fmr1 KO mice [9093]. Moreover, in the Drosophila melanogaster fragile X model (dFMR1−/−), there are significant reductions in three receptors that have a high homology with ionotropic GABA receptors: resistant to dieldrin (Rdl), GABA and glycine-like receptor of Drosophila (Grd), and ligand-gated chloride channel homolog 3 (Lcch3) [91]. Our laboratory has found significantly reduced protein expression of various GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor subunits in three brain regions (namely, the cerebellum, parietal cortex and BA9) of subjects with autism [3234]. In BA9 we observed significantly reduced expression of GABAA receptor subunit α1 (GABRα1), GABAA receptor subunit α4 (GABRα4), GABAA receptor subunit α5 (GABRα5), GABAA receptor subunit β1 (GABRβ1), and GABAB receptor subunit 1 (GABBR1) [3234]. In the parietal cortex we observed significantly reduced expression of GABRα1, GABAA receptor subunit α2 (GABRα2), GABAA receptor subunit α3 (GABRα3), GABAA receptor subunit β3 (GABRβ3) and GABBR1 [3234]. In the cerebellum we observed significant reduction in expression of GABRα1, GABRβ3, GABBR1 and GABAB receptor subunit 2 (GABBR2) [3234]. More recently, using a different set of tissue samples, we observed reduced expression of GABRβ3 in the cerebellar vermis of adults with autism [31]. Our consistent findings of reduced GABA receptor protein expression in multiple brain regions of people with autism can be explained by the reduced expression of FMRP.

A further connection to this pathway includes the reduction in Reelin protein in sera and blood from individuals with autism [94, 95]. Recently, mRNA for Reelin, a glycoprotein with multiple roles during development (namely, neuronal cell migration and brain lamination) and in adults (namely, modulating synaptic function), has been identified as a target of FMRP [20]. Reelin has long been considered a potential biomarker for autism due to its roles during development. Our laboratory has demonstrated reduced Reelin protein expression in sera, BA9, and the cerebella of adults with autism [9496], supporting the idea that Reelin deficits contribute to the pathology of autism. This reduction in Reelin expression may be due to dysregulation of FMRP expression in people with autism.

Building upon the mGluR5 theory of FXS [26] and our own findings using postmortem brain tissue from people with autism, we hypothesize that activation of mGluR5 in the brains of children with autism [30, 31, 97] leads to subsequent translocation of protein for FMRP from neuronal cell bodies to dendrites, and eventual decrease in FMRP at synapses [25]. Alternatively, an unknown mechanism of reduced expression of FMRP leads to increased mGluR5 signaling. These events may also lead to impaired GABAergic and Reelin signaling, ultimately leading to the morphological, cognitive, and behavioral deficits associated with autism (Figure 5). Deficits in the inhibitory GABAergic system could cause a perturbation in the excitatory/inhibitory balance in brain circuitry, potentially leading to the presence of seizures as well as impaired cognitive function. Deficits in Reelin function would also lead to abnormal brain development and abnormal synaptic transmission. Further evidence for impaired synaptic plasticity comes from altered expression of other targets of FMRP and mGluR5 signaling (namely APP, RAC1, and STEP), resulting in altered dendritic spine morphology and function as well as altered AMPA and NMDA receptor subunit composition (Figure 5). Taken together, abnormal FMRP and mGluR5 signaling in people with autism who do not have a diagnosis of FXS could explain the multiple pathologies of autism. We performed statistical correlations between levels of FMRP and mGluR5 previously reported [30, 31] against RAC1, APP, STEP, and homer 1, which did not result in any significant values (data not shown). However, as relationships between these proteins are neither simple, biochemically well understood, nor stoichiometrically in a 1:1 ratio, this absence of correlation does not minimize the significance of findings in this report. Moreover, as recently shown by Darnell and Klann [98], FMRP target levels may appear unchanged or even decreased due to factors such as age, brain site, increased protein turnover and protein activation state, potentially offsetting target protein increases.
Figure 5

Reduction of FMRP expression has multiple consequences. In the absence or with reductions of FMRP, mGluR5-mediated signaling and protein synthesis is accelerated, resulting in increased expression of RAC1, APP, and STEP. Increased RAC1 and APP results in altered dendritic morphology, including presence of increased dendritic spines with a long, immature appearance. Increased STEP activity dephosphorylates multiple targets, including AMPA receptors and NMDA receptors, resulting in receptor internalization and altered synaptic transmission. Reduced homer 1 expression, reduces homer 1-mGluR5 interactions, facilitating long term depression. Reduced FMRP also results in reduced expression of GABAA and GABAB receptor subunits, resulting in impaired GABAergic signaling. Reduced FMRP expression may also impact Reelin expression causing further effects on synaptic transmission. The overall effect of these changes is impaired synaptic transmission and ultimately the cognitive and behavioral deficits associated with autism. FMRP, fragile X mental retardation protein; mGluR5, metabotropic glutamate receptor 5; RAC1, Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1; amyloid beta A4 precursor protein; STEP, striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase; AMPA, 2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2- oxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid; NDMA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; GABA, gamma aminobutyric acid.

Our results also may open new ways of treating people with autism. Drugs that target metabotropic glutamate receptors have been shown to reverse morphological and behavioral deficits in Fmr1 KO mice. AFQ056, 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP), and 2-chloro-4-((2,5-dimethyl-1-(4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl)ethynyl)pyridine (CTEP), antagonists of mGluR5, have been shown to reduce the number of dendritic protrusions of cultured hippocampal neurons and primary visual cortex neurons from Fmr1 KO mice [99101]. In Fmr1 KO mice, treatment with MPEP or AFQ056 rescues deficits in prepulse inhibition (PPI) [99, 100], a sensorimotor gating behavior that is disrupted in subjects with autism, schizophrenia, and other psychiatric disorders. CTEP, a newer anti-mGluR5 inhibitor that is more potent and long lasting than MPEP, has been shown to correct for audiogenic seizures, hippocampal long-term depression, and cognitive deficits in Fmr 1 KO mice [101]. The application of Rac1 inhibitor NSC23766 to hippocampal slices from Fmr1 KO mice reduced long-term depression, suggesting that modulation of RAC1 could ameliorate synaptic transmission deficits associated with FXS [49]. Minocycline, a tetracycline derivative, inhibits Aβ-induced neuronal cell death, Aβ fibril formation, and microglial activation [102, 103]. Minocycline can also reverse FXS phenotypes, including dendritic spine immaturity [104]. The latter therapies represent more targeted approaches, and as there are currently no approved glutamatergic inhibitors for use in humans, treatments that focus on mGluR5, RAC1 or APP may provide safe, effective means of ameliorating the behavioral deficits of autism.

Conclusions

Taken together, the results of current postmortem studies provide novel evidence that targets of FMRP and mGluR5 signaling (RAC1, homer 1, APP, and STEP) display altered expression in the cerebellar vermis and BA9 of people with autism. There was a significant confounding effect of anticonvulant drugs on STEP 46 kDa/β-actin and a potential effect on homer 1/NSE in BA9 of adults with autism. These results are consistent with results from FXS animal models, despite the fact that none of the individuals included in the current study were diagnosed with FXS. The altered expression of proteins that may contribute to altered dendritic protein translation (homer 1), altered dendritic morphology (APP and RAC1), and receptor subunit expression (STEP), potentially contribute to the cognitive and behavioral impairments associated with autism and FXS. Our data tie in with our previous experiments, in which we have found reductions in protein expression for Reelin and GABA receptor subunit expression in multiple brain regions of people with autism. We hypothesize that reduction in FMRP and increase in mGluR5 may contribute to the dysregulation of these proteins in subjects with autism, resulting in multiple brain structural and behavioral deficits.

Abbreviations

Aβ: 

Beta amyloid

AMPA: 

2-Amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2- oxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid

APD: 

Antipsychotic drug

APP: 

Amyloid beta A4 precursor protein

BA9: 

Brodmann area 9

CDC: 

Centers for disease control and prevention

CTEP: 

2-Chloro-4-((2,5-dimethyl-1-(4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl)-1H-imidazol-4-yl)ethynyl)pyridine

CYFIP: 

Cytoplasmic FMRP interacting proteins

ERK: 

Extracellular signal-regulated kinases

FMR1: 

Fragile X mental retardation 1

FRMP: 

Fragile X mental retardation protein

FXS: 

Fragile X syndrome

GABA: 

Gamma aminobutyric acid

GABRα: 

GABAA receptor subunit alpha

GABRβ: 

GABAA receptor subunit beta

GFAP: 

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

GKAP: 

Guanylate kinase associated protein

GRD: 

Glycine-like receptor of Drosophila

GTP: 

Guanine triphosphate

KO: 

Knockout

LCCH3: 

Ligand-gated chloride channel homolog 3

LTD: 

Long-term depression

mGluR5: 

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5

MPEP: 

2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine

NMDA: 

N-methyl-D-aspartate

NSE: 

Neuronal specific enolase

PBS: 

Phosphate-buffered saline

PMI: 

Postmortem interval

PSD: 

Postsynaptic density

RAC1: 

Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1

RDL: 

Resistant to dieldrin

RT: 

Room temperature

STEP: 

Striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase

TCI: 

Transitory cognitive impairment.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Human tissue was obtained from the NICHD Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD (the role of the NICHD Brain and Tissue Bank is to distribute tissue, and therefore, cannot endorse the studies performed or the interpretation of results); the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center, which is supported in part by Public Health Service grant number R24 MH068855; the Brain Endowment Bank, which is funded in part by the National Parkinson Foundation, Inc., Miami, Florida; and the Autism Tissue Program, and is gratefully acknowledged. Grant support by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (#5R01HD052074-01A2 and 3R01HD052074-03S1) and the Minnesota Medical Foundation Alfred and Ingrid Lenz Harrison Autism Initiative Fund to SHF is gratefully acknowledged. The funding body had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. SH Fatemi is also supported by the Bernstein Endowed Chair in adult psychiatry.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, Division of Neuroscience Research, University of Minnesota Medical School
(2)
Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Medical School
(3)
Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota Medical School
(4)
Department of Psychiatry, VA Medical Center

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 1994, Washington, DC: APA Press, 4Google Scholar
  2. Casanova MF, Buxhoeveden DP, Switala AE, Roy E: Minicolumnar pathology in autism. Neurology. 2002, 58: 428-432. 10.1212/WNL.58.3.428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Palmen SJ, van Engeland H, Hof PR, Schmitz C: Neuropathological findings in autism. Brain. 2004, 127: 2572-2583. 10.1093/brain/awh287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McCaffrey P, Deutsch CK: Macrocephaly and the control of brain growth in autistic disorders. Prog Neurobiol. 2005, 77: 38-56. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.10.005.Google Scholar
  5. Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network Surveillance Year 2008 Principal Investigators; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders-Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 sites, United States, 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2012, 61: 1-19.Google Scholar
  6. Canitano R: Epilepsy in autism spectrum disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006, 16: 61-66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Aarts JH, Binnie CD, Smit AM, Wilkins AJ: Selective cognitive impairment during focal and generalized epileptiform EEG activity. Brain. 1984, 107: 293-308. 10.1093/brain/107.1.293.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Binnie CD: Cognitive impairment during epileptiform discharges: is it ever justifiable to treat the EEG?. Lancet Neurol. 2003, 2: 725-730. 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00584-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Geschwind DH: Autism: many genes, common pathways?. Cell. 2008, 135: 391-395. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.016.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Abrahams BS, Geschwind DH: Advances in autism genetics: on the threshold of a new neurobiology. Nat Rev Genet. 2008, 9: 341-355. 10.1038/nrg2346.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sakai Y, Shaw CA, Dawson BC, Dugas DV, Al-Mohtaseb Z, Hill DE, Zoghbi HY: Protein interactome reveals converging molecular pathways among autism disorders. Sci Transl Med. 2011, 3: 86ra49-10.1126/scitranslmed.3002166.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Numis AL, Major P, Montenegro MA, Muzykewicz DA, Pulsifer MB, Thiele EA: Identification of risk factors for autism spectrum disorders in tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology. 2011, 76: 981-987. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182104347.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagerman R, Au J, Hagerman P: FMR1 premutation and full mutation molecular mechanisms related to autism. J Neurodev Disord. 2011, 3: 211-224. 10.1007/s11689-011-9084-5.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Loat CS, Curran S, Lewis CM, Duvall J, Geschwind D, Bolton P, Craig IW: Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 polymorphisms and vulnerability to autism. Genes Brain Behav. 2008, 7: 754-760. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00414.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonati MT, Russo S, Finelli P, Valsecchi MR, Cavalleri F, Roberts W, Elia M, Larizza L: Evaluation of autism traits in Angelman syndrome: a resource to unfold autism genes. Neurogenetics. 2007, 8: 169-178. 10.1007/s10048-007-0086-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hatton DD, Sideris J, Skinner M, Mankowski J, Bailey DB, Roberts J, Mirrett P: Autistic behavior in children with Fragile X syndrome: prevalence, stability, and the impact of FMRP. Am J Med Genet A. 2006, 140A: 1804-1813. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kauffman WE, Cortell R, Kau A, Bukelis I, Tierney E, Gray R, Cox C, Capone G, Stanard P: Autism spectrum disorder in fragile X syndrome: Communication, social interaction, and specific behaviors. Am J Med Genet A. 2004, 129A: 225-234. 10.1002/ajmg.a.30229.Google Scholar
  18. Hagerman RJ, Staley LW, O’Conner R, Lugenbeel K, Nelson D, McLean SD, Taylor A: Learning-disabled males with a fragile X CGG expansion in the upper premutation size range. Pediatrics. 1996, 97: 122-126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bassell GJ, Warren ST: Fragile X syndrome: loss of local mRNA regulation alters synaptic development and function. Neuron. 2008, 60: 201-214. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Darnell JC, Van Driesche SJ, Zhang C, Hung KY, Mele A, Fraser CE, Stone EF, Chen C, Fak JJ, Chi SW, Licatalosi DD, Richter JD, Darnell RB: FMRP stalls ribosomal translocation on mRNAs linked to synaptic function and autism. Cell. 2011, 146: 247-261. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.013.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Devys D, Lutz Y, Rouyer N, Bellocq JP, Mandel JL: The FMR-1 protein is cytoplasmic, most abundant in neurons and appears normal in carriers of a fragile X premutation. Nat Genet. 1993, 4: 335-340. 10.1038/ng0893-335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pacey LK, Doering LC: Developmental expression of FMRP in the astrocyte lineage: implications for fragile X syndrome. Glia. 2007, 55: 1601-1609. 10.1002/glia.20573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Weiler IJ, Irwin SA, Klintsova AY, Spencer CM, Brazelton AD, Miyashiro K, Comery TA, Patel B, Eberwine J, Greenough WT: Fragile X mental retardation protein is translated near synapses in response to neurotransmitter activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997, 94: 5395-5400. 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5395.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Bakker CE, de Diego OY, Bontekoe C, Raghoe P, Luteijn T, Hoogeveen AT, Oostra BA, Willemsen R: Immunocytochemical and biochemical characterization of FMRP, FXR1P, and FXR2P in the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 2000, 258: 162-170. 10.1006/excr.2000.4932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Krueger DD, Bear MF: The mGluR theory of fragile X syndrome. Autism Spectrum Disorders. Edited by: Amaral DG, Dawson G, Geschwind DH. 2011, New York: Oxford University Press, USA, 1239-1258.Google Scholar
  26. Bear MF, Huber KM, Warren ST: The mGluR theory of Fragile X mental retardation. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27: 370-377. 10.1016/j.tins.2004.04.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Grossman AW, Elisseou NM, McKinney BC, Greenough WT: Hippocampal pyramidal cells in adult Fmr1 knockout mice exhibit an immature-appearing profile of dendritic spines. Brain Res. 2006, 1084: 158-164. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hutsler JJ, Zhang H: Increased dendritic spine densities on cortical projection neurons in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res. 2010, 1309: 83-94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Irwin SA, Patel B, Idupulapati M, Harris JB, Crisostomo RA, Larsen BP, Kooy F, Willems PJ, Cras P, Kozlowski PB, Swain RA, Weiler IJ, Greenough WT: Abnormal dendritic spine characteristics in the temporal and visual cortices of patients with fragile-X syndrome: a quantitative examination. Am J Med Genet. 2001, 98: 161-171. 10.1002/1096-8628(20010115)98:2<161::AID-AJMG1025>3.0.CO;2-B.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Fatemi SH, Folsom TD: Dysregulation of fragile X mental retardation protein and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in superior frontal cortex of subjects with autism: a postmortem brain study. Mol Autism. 2011, 2: 6-10.1186/2040-2392-2-6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fatemi SH, Folsom TD, Kneeland RE, Liesch SB: Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 upregulation in children with autism is associated with underexpression of both Fragile X mental retardation protein and GABAA receptor beta 3 in adults with autism. Anat Rec. 2011, 294: 1635-1645. 10.1002/ar.21299.Google Scholar
  32. Fatemi SH, Reutiman TJ, Folsom TD, Thuras PD: GABA(A) Receptor downregulation in brains of subjects with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2009, 39: 223-230. 10.1007/s10803-008-0646-7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Fatemi SH, Folsom TD, Reutiman TJ, Thuras PD: Expression of GABA(B) receptors is altered in brains of subjects with autism. Cerebellum. 2009, 8: 64-69. 10.1007/s12311-008-0075-3.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fatemi SH, Reutiman TJ, Folsom TD, Rooney RJ, Patel DH, Thuras PD: mRNA and Protein levels for GABA(A) alpha 4, alpha 5, beta 1, and GABA(B)R1 receptors are altered in brains from subjects with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2010, 40: 743-750. 10.1007/s10803-009-0924-z.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Cohen J: A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992, 112: 155-159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Voineagu I, Wang X, Johnston P, Lowe JK, Tian Y, Horvath S, Mill J, Cantor RM, Blencowe BJ, Geschwind DH: Transcriptomic analysis of autistic brain reveals convergent molecular pathology. Nature. 2011, 474: 380-384. 10.1038/nature10110.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Bustelo XR, Sauzeau V, Berenjeno IM: GTP-binding proteins of the Rho/Rac family: regulation, effectors and functions in vivo. Bioessays. 2007, 29: 356-370. 10.1002/bies.20558.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaibuchi K, Kuroda S, Amano M: Regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell adhesion by the Rho family GTPases in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Biochem. 1999, 68: 459-486. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Corbetta S, Gualdoni S, Ciceri G, Monari M, Zuccaro E, Tybulewicz VL, de Curtis I: Essential role of Rac1 and Rac3 GTPases in neuronal development. FASEB J. 2009, 23: 1347-1357. 10.1096/fj.08-121574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Negishi M, Katoh H: Rho family GTPases and dendrite plasticity. Neuroscientist. 2005, 11: 187-191. 10.1177/1073858404268768.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tashiro A, Yuste R: Regulation of dendritic spine motility and stability by Rac1 and Rho kinase: evidence for two forms of spine motility. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004, 26: 429-440. 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.04.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiens KM, Lin H, Liao D: Rac1 induces the clustering of AMPA receptors during spinogenesis. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 10627-10636. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1947-05.2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yuste R: Dendritic Spines. 2010, Cambridge, MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Billuart P, Bienvenu T, Ronce N, Des Portes V, Vinet MC, Zemni R, Roest Crollius H, Carrié A, Fauchereau F, Cherry M, Briault S, Hamel B, Fryns JP, Beldjord C, Kahn A, Moraine C, Chelly J: Oligophrenin-1 encodes a rhoGAP protein involved in X-linked mental retardation. Nature. 1998, 392: 923-926. 10.1038/31940.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Arai Y, Ijuin T, Takenawa T, Becker LE, Takashima S: Excessive expression of synaptojanin in brains with Down syndrome. Brain Dev. 2002, 24: 67-72. 10.1016/S0387-7604(01)00405-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schenck A, Bardoni B, Moro A, Bagni C, Mandel JL: A highly conserved protein family interacting with the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and displaying selective interactions with FMRP-related proteins FXR1P and FXR2P. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 8844-8849. 10.1073/pnas.151231598.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schenck A, Bardoni B, Langmann C, Harden N, Mandel JL, Giangrande A: CYFIP/Sra-1 controls neuronal connectivity in Drosophila and links the Rac1 GTPase pathway to the fragile X protein. Neuron. 2003, 38: 887-898. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00354-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Castets M, Schaeffer C, Bechara E, Schenck A, Khandjian EW, Luche S, Moine H, Rabilloud T, Mandel JL, Bardoni B: FMRP interferes with the Rac1 pathway and controls actin cytoskeleton dynamics in murine fibroblasts. Hum MolGenet. 2005, 14: 835-844.Google Scholar
  49. Bongmba OY, Martinez LA, Elhardt ME, Butler K, Tejada-Simon MV: Modulation of dendritic spines and synaptic function by Rac1: A possible link to fragile X syndrome pathology. Brain Res. 2011, 1399: 79-95.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Luo L, Hensch TK, Ackerman L, Barbel S, Jan LY, Jan YN: Differential effects of the Rac GTPase on Purkinje cell axons and dendritic trunks and spines. Nature. 1996, 379: 837-840. 10.1038/379837a0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Nakayama AY, Harms MB, Luo L: Small GTPases Rac and Rho in the maintenance of dendritic spines and branches in hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci. 2000, 20: 5329-5338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Racchetti G, D’Alessandro R, Meldolesi J: Astrocyte stellation, a process dependent on Rac1 is sustained by the regulated exocytosis of enlargeosomes. Glia. 2012, 60: 465-475. 10.1002/glia.22280.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Bourguignon LY, Gilad E, Peyrollier K, Brightman A, Swanson RA: Hyaluronan-CD44 interaction stimulates Rac1 signaling and PKN gamma kinase activation leading to cytoskeleton function and cell migration in astrocytes. J Neurochem. 2007, 101: 1002-1017. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04485.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Laurence JA, Fatemi SH: Glial fibrillary acidic protein is elevated in superior frontal, parietal and cerebellar cortices of autistic subjects. Cerebellum. 2005, 4: 201-210.Google Scholar
  55. Sokol DK, Chen D, Farlow MR, Dunn DW, Maloney B, Zimmer JA, Lahiri DK: High levels of Alzheimer beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP) in children with severely autistic behavior and aggression. J Child Neurol. 2006, 21: 444-449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Bailey AR, Giunta BN, Obregon D, Nikolic WV, Tian J, Sanberg CD, Sutton DT, Tan J: Peripheral biomarkers in autism: Secreted amyloid precursor protein-alpha as a probable key player in early diagnosis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2008, 1: 338-344.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ray B, Long JM, Sokol DK, Lahiri DK: Increased secreted amyloid precursor protein-α (sAPPα) in severe autism: proposal of a specific, anabolic pathway and putative biomarker. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e20405-10.1371/journal.pone.0020405.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Sokol DK, Maloney B, Long JM, Ray B, Lahiri DK: Autism, Alzheimer disease, and fragile X: APP, FMRP, and mGluR5 are molecular links. Neurology. 2011, 76: 344-1352.Google Scholar
  59. Westmark CJ, Malter JS: FMRP mediates mGluR5-dependent translation of amyloid precursor protein. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5: e52-10.1371/journal.pbio.0050052.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang H, Xu H, Dyck LE, Li XM: Olanzapine and quetiapine protect PC12 cells from beta-amyloid peptide(25–35)-induced oxidative stress and the ensuing apoptosis. J Neurosci Res. 2005, 81: 572-580. 10.1002/jnr.20570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Chavant F, Deguil J, Pain S, Ingrand I, Milin S, Fauconneau B, Pérault-Pochat MC, Lafay- Chebassier C: Imipramine, in part through tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition, prevents cognitive decline and beta-amyloid accumulation in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010, 332: 505-514. 10.1124/jpet.109.162164.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Volknandt W, Karas M: Proteomic analysis of the presynaptic active zone. Exp Brain Res. 2012, 217: 449-461. 10.1007/s00221-012-3031-x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Innocent N, Cousins SL, Stephenson FA: NMDA receptor/amyloid precursor protein interactions: a comparison between wild-type and amyloid precursor protein mutations associated with familial Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2012, 515: 131-136. 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.029.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Cousins SL, Hoey SE, Stephenson FA, Perkinton MS: Amyloid precursor protein 695 associates with assembled NR2A- and NR2B-containing NMDA receptors to result in the enhancement of their cell surface delivery. J Neurochem. 2009, 111: 1501-1513. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06424.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Hoe HS, Fu Z, Makarova A, Lee JY, Lu C, Feng L, Pajoohesh-Ganji A, Matsuoka Y, Hyman BT, Ehlers MD, Vicini S, Pak DT, Rebeck GW: The effects of amyloid precursor protein on postsynaptic composition and activity. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 8495-8506.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Westmark CJ, Westmark PR, O’Riordan KJ, Ray BC, Hervey CM, Salamat MS, Abozeid SH, Stein KM, Stodola LA, Tranfaglia M, Burger C, Berry-Kravis EM, Malter JS: Reversal of fragile X phenotypes by manipulation of AβPP/Aβ levels in Fmr1KO mice. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e26549-10.1371/journal.pone.0026549.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Matsui T, Ingelsson M, Fukumoto H, Ramasamy K, Kowa H, Frosch MP, Irizarry MC, Hyman BT: Expression of APP pathway mRNAs and proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2007, 1161: 116-123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Kim SH, Markham JA, Weiler IJ, Greenough WT: Aberrant early-phase ERK inactivation impedes neuronal function in fragile X syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105: 4429-4434. 10.1073/pnas.0800257105.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Canal F, Palygin O, Pankratov Y, Corrêa SA, Müller J: Compartmentalization of the MAPK scaffold protein KSR1 modulates synaptic plasticity in hippocampal neurons. FASEB. 2011, 25: 2362-2372. 10.1096/fj.10-173153.Google Scholar
  70. Zhang Y, Venkitaramani DV, Gladding CM, Zhang Y, Kurup P, Molnar E, Collingridge GL, Lombroso PJ: The tyrosine phosphatase STEP mediates AMPA receptor endocytosis after metabotropic glutamate receptor stimulation. J Neurosci. 2008, 28: 10561-10566. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2666-08.2008.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Sharma E, Zhao F, Bult A, Lambroso PJ: Identification of two alternatively spliced transcripts of STEP: a subfamily of brain-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatases. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1995, 32: 87-93. 10.1016/0169-328X(95)00066-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Bult A, Zhao F, Dirkx R, Raghunathan A, Solimena M, Lombroso PJ: STEP: a family of brain-enriched PTPs. Alternative splicing produces transmembrane, cytosolic and truncated isoforms. Eur J Cell Biol. 1997, 72: 337-344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Goebel-Goody SM, Wilson-Wallis ED, Royston S, Tagliatela SM, Naegele JR, Lombroso PJ: Genetic manipulation of STEP reverses behavioral abnormalities in a fragile X syndrome mouse model. Genes Brain Behav. 2012, 11: 586-600. 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00781.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Fitzpatrick CJ, Lombroso P: The Role of Striatal-Enriched Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase (STEP) in Cognition. Front Neuroanat. 2011, 5: 47-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Carty NC, Xu J, Kurup P, Brouillette J, Goebel-Goody SM, Austin DR, Yuan P, Chen G, Correa PR, Haroutunian V, Pittenger C, Lombroso PJ: The tyrosine phosphatase STEP: implications in schizophrenia and the molecular mechanism underlying antipsychotic medications. Transl Psychiatry. 2012, 2: e137-10.1038/tp.2012.63.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Kurup P, Zhang Y, Xu J, Venkitaramani DV, Haroutunian V, Greengard P, Nairn AC, Lombroso PJ: Abeta-mediated NMDA receptor endocytosis in Alzheimer’s disease involves ubiquitination of the tyrosine phosphatase STEP61. J Neurosci. 2010, 30: 5948-5957. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0157-10.2010.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Huber KM, Gallagher SM, Warren ST, Bear MF: Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation. Proc Acad Natl Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 7746-7750. 10.1073/pnas.122205699.Google Scholar
  78. Zhang Y, Kurup P, Xu J, Carty N, Fernandez SM, Nygaard HB, Pittenger C, Greengard P, Strittmatter SM, Nairn AC, Lombroso PJ: Genetic reduction of striatal-enriched tyrosine phosphatase (STEP) reverses cognitive and cellular deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107: 19014-19019. 10.1073/pnas.1013543107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Hasegawa S, Morioka M, Goto S, Korematsu K, Okamura A, Yano S, Kai Y, Hamada JI, Ushio Y: Expression of neuron specific phosphatase, striatal enriched phosphatase (STEP) in reactive astrocytes after transient forebrain ischemia. Glia. 2000, 29: 316-329. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(20000215)29:4<316::AID-GLIA3>3.0.CO;2-O.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Briggs SW, Walker J, Asik K, Lombroso P, Naegele J, Aaron G: STEP regulation of seizure thresholds in the hippocampus. Epilepsia. 2011, 52: 497-506. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02912.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Tu JC, Xiao B, Yuan JP, Lanahan AA, Leoffert K, Li M, Linden DJ, Worley PF: Homer binds a novel prolin-rich motif and links group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors with IP3 receptors. Neuron. 1998, 21: 717-726. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80589-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Tu JC, Xiao B, Naisbitt S, Yuan JP, Petralia RS, Brakeman P, Doan A, Aakalu VK, Lanahan AA, Sheng M, Worley PF: Coupling of mGluR/Homer and PSD-95 complexes by the Shank family of postsynaptic density protein. Neuron. 1999, 23: 583-592. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80810-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Giuffrida R, Musumeci S, D’Antoni S, Bonaccorso CM, Giuffrida-Stella AM, Oostra BA, Catania MV: A reduced number of metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 receptors are associated with constitutive homer proteins in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 8908-8916. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0932-05.2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Ango F, Robbe D, Muller T, Tu JC, Xiao B, Worley PF, Pin JP, Bockaert J, Fagni L: Homer-dependent cell surface expression of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 in neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2002, 20: 323-329. 10.1006/mcne.2002.1100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Kammermeier PJ: Endogenous homer proteins regulate metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling in neurons. J Neurosci. 2008, 28: 8560-8567. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1830-08.2008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Sergé A, Fourgeaud L, Hémar A, Choquet D: Receptor activation and Homer differentially control the lateral mobility of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in the neuronal membrane. J Neurosci. 2002, 22: 3910-3920.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Ronesi JA, Huber KM: Homer interactions are necessary for metabotropic glutamate receptor-induced long-term depression and translational activation. J Neurosci. 2008, 28: 543-547. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5019-07.2008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Kelleher RJ, Geigenmüller U, Hovhannisyan H, Trautman E, Pinard R, Rathmell B, Carpenter R, Margulies D: High-throughput sequencing of mGluR signaling pathway genes reveals enrichment of rare variants in autism. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e35003-10.1371/journal.pone.0035003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. de Bartolomeis A, Tomasetti C, Cicale M, Yuan PX, Manji HK: Chronic treatment with lithium or valproate modulates the expression of Homer1b/c and its related genes Shank and Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012, 22: 527-535. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.11.006.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. El Idrissi A, Ding XH, Scalia J, Trenkner E, Brown WT, Dobkin C: Decreased GABAA receptor expression in the seizure-prone fragile X mouse. Neurosci Lett. 2005, 377: 141-146. 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.11.087.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. D’Hulst C, De Geest N, Reeve SP, Van Dam D, De Deyn PP, Hassan BA, Kooy RF: Decreased expression of the GABAA receptor in fragile X syndrome. Brain Res. 2006, 1121: 238-245. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Gantois I, Vandescompele J, Speleman F, Reyniers E, D’Hooge R, Severijnen LA, Willemsen R, Tassone F, Kooy RF: Expression profiling suggests underexpression of the GABAA receptor subunit delta in the fragile X knockout mouse model. Neurobiol Dis. 2006, 21: 346-357. 10.1016/j.nbd.2005.07.017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Hong A, Zhang A, Ke Y, El Idrissi A, Shen CH: Downregulation of GABA(A) β subunits is transcriptionally controlled by Fmr1p. J Mol Neurosci. 2012, 46: 272-275. 10.1007/s12031-011-9531-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Fatemi SH, Stary JM, Halt AR, Realmuto GR: Dysregulation of Reelin and Bcl-2 proteins in autistic cerebellum. J Autism Dev Disord. 2001, 31: 529-535. 10.1023/A:1013234708757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Fatemi SH, Stary JM, Egan EA: Reduced blood levels of reelin as a vulnerability factor in pathophysiology of autistic disorder. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2002, 22: 139-152. 10.1023/A:1019857620251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Fatemi SH, Snow AV, Stary JM, Araghi-Niknam M, Reutiman TJ, Lee S, Brooks AI, Pearce DA: Reelin signaling is impaired in autism. Biol Psychiatry. 2005, 57: 777-787. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.018.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Fatemi SH, Folsom TD: The role of fragile X mental retardation protein in major mental disorders. Neuropharmacology. 2012, 60: 1221-1226.Google Scholar
  98. Darnell JC, Klann E: The translation of translational control by FMRP: therapeutic targets for FXS. Nat Neurosci. 2013, 10.1038/nn.3379.Google Scholar
  99. de Vrij FM, Levenga J, van der Linde HC, Koekkoek SK, De Zeeuw CI, Nelson DL, Oostra BA, Willemsen R: Rescue of behavioral phenotype and neuronal protrusion morphology in Fmr1 KO mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2008, 31: 127-132. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.04.002.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Levenga J, Hayashi S, de Vrij FM, Koekkoek SK, van der Linde HC, Nieuwenhuizen I, Song C, Buijsen RA, Pop AS, Gomezmancilla B, Nelson DL, Willemsen R, Gasparini F, Oostra BA: AFQ506, a new mGluR5 antagonist for treatment of fragile X syndrome. Trends Mol Med. 2011, 16: 516-527.Google Scholar
  101. Michalon A, Sidorov M, Ballard TM, Ozmen L, Spooren W, Wettstein JG, Jaeschke G, Bear MF, Lindemann L: Chronic pharmacological mGlu5 inhibition corrects fragile X in adult mice. Neuron. 2012, 74: 49-56. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Familian A, Boshuizen RS, Eikelenboom P, Veerhuis R: Inhibitory effect of minocycline on amyloid beta fibril formation and human microglial activation. Glia. 2006, 53: 233-240. 10.1002/glia.20268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Ryu JK, Franciosi S, Sattayaprasert P, Kim SU, McLarnon JG: Minocycline inhibits neuronal death and glial activation induced by beta-amyloid peptide in rat hippocampus. Glia. 2004, 48: 85-90. 10.1002/glia.20051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Bilousova TV, Dansie L, Ngo M, Aye J, Charles JR, Ethell DW, Ethell IM: Minocycline promotes dendritic spine maturation and improves behavioural performance in the fragile X mouse model. J Med Genet. 2009, 46: 94-102.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Fatemi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement