Open Access

RNA sequencing and proteomics approaches reveal novel deficits in the cortex of Mecp2-deficient mice, a model for Rett syndrome

  • Natasha L. Pacheco1,
  • Michael R. Heaven2,
  • Leanne M. Holt1, 6,
  • David K. Crossman3,
  • Kristin J. Boggio4,
  • Scott A. Shaffer4,
  • Daniel L. Flint5 and
  • Michelle L. Olsen1, 6Email author
Molecular AutismBrain, Cognition and Behavior20178:56

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-017-0174-4

Received: 20 June 2017

Accepted: 2 October 2017

Published: 24 October 2017

Abstract

Background

Rett syndrome (RTT) is an X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder caused by mutations in the transcriptional regulator MeCP2. Much of our understanding of MeCP2 function is derived from transcriptomic studies with the general assumption that alterations in the transcriptome correlate with proteomic changes. Advances in mass spectrometry-based proteomics have facilitated recent interest in the examination of global protein expression to better understand the biology between transcriptional and translational regulation.

Methods

We therefore performed the first comprehensive transcriptome-proteome comparison in a RTT mouse model to elucidate RTT pathophysiology, identify potential therapeutic targets, and further our understanding of MeCP2 function. The whole cortex of wild-type and symptomatic RTT male littermates (n = 4 per genotype) were analyzed using RNA-sequencing and data-independent acquisition liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis was used to identify significantly affected pathways in the transcriptomic and proteomic data sets.

Results

Our results indicate these two “omics” data sets supplement one another. In addition to confirming previous works regarding mRNA expression in Mecp2-deficient animals, the current study identified hundreds of novel protein targets. Several selected protein targets were validated by Western blot analysis. These data indicate RNA metabolism, proteostasis, monoamine metabolism, and cholesterol synthesis are disrupted in the RTT proteome. Hits common to both data sets indicate disrupted cellular metabolism, calcium signaling, protein stability, DNA binding, and cytoskeletal cell structure. Finally, in addition to confirming disrupted pathways and identifying novel hits in neuronal structure and synaptic transmission, our data indicate aberrant myelination, inflammation, and vascular disruption. Intriguingly, there is no evidence of reactive gliosis, but instead, gene, protein, and pathway analysis suggest astrocytic maturation and morphological deficits.

Conclusions

This comparative omics analysis supports previous works indicating widespread CNS dysfunction and may serve as a valuable resource for those interested in cellular dysfunction in RTT.

Keywords

TranscriptomeProteomeRett syndromeMulti-cellular deficits

Background

Rett syndrome (RTT) is an X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder that annually affects 1:10,000–15,000 females worldwide. RTT is characterized by apparently normal development until approximately 6–18 months of age, when patients exhibit a decrease in motor and cognitive functions [1]. Additional clinical features of RTT patients include hand stereotypies, breathing abnormalities, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and seizures [1]. RTT patients require life-long, constant care limited to palliative procedures.

Approximately 95% of RTT patients have a mutation in the transcriptional regulator methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene [2, 3]. MeCP2 is a global transcription factor that can activate and repress transcription [4, 5], with additional roles in RNA splicing and chromatin compaction [69]. While MeCP2 is expressed in multiple tissues throughout the body, it is most highly expressed in the brain, specifically in the cortex and cerebellum [10, 11]. MeCP2 is most highly expressed in post-mitotic neurons compared to other CNS cell types [12, 13], with recent work indicating MeCP2 expression in other neural cell populations including astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes [1418].

To elucidate the pathophysiology of RTT and identify potential therapeutic targets, multiple laboratories have investigated gene expression profiles in Mecp2-deficient mice, rat, and postmortem human tissue utilizing microarray as well as RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) [4, 9, 1934]. Collectively, these studies found significantly altered gene transcription, in some instances hundreds of genes, and provided valuable insight regarding additional transcriptional roles of MeCP2 for miRNA and long non-coding RNA [2729, 35]. In addition to global gene expression studies, few groups have examined global protein expression changes in a RTT mouse [36] and zebrafish [37] model, as well as RTT patients [38, 39]. With recent advances in the sensitivity that can be obtained from mass spectrometry-based proteomics, there is an increasing need to incorporate multi-omics approaches in understanding the relationship between gene and protein expression in various disease pathologies.

Accordingly, we postulated that examination of global protein expression in RTT as well as a simultaneous comparison in data obtained between two omics platforms from the same animal model and tissue region may elucidate unknown RTT pathophysiology. In the present study, RNA-Seq, proteomics, and comparison of our data to publicly available databases of cellular brain gene expression patterns were applied to better understand RTT pathophysiology. We performed these studies in cortical tissue obtained from the Jaenisch murine model of RTT, a commonly used model that recapitulates many aspects of RTT pathophysiology, including hind limb clasping, decreased mobility, breathing abnormalities, abnormal gait, and seizures [40, 41]. Our data support recent works indicating widespread cellular dysfunction in RTT and point toward novel molecular targets in cellular metabolism, protein stability, cytoskeletal structure, and calcium signaling.

Methods

Animals

All experimental protocols were followed according to NIH guidelines and approval from the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Wild-type (WT) males were bred with heterozygous Mecp2 tm1.1Jae/+ (Jaenisch) female mice [40]. The founding heterozygous Mecp2 tm1.1Jae/+ female mice and WT male mice (C57BL/6J) were obtained from the Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Centers (MMRRC). Colonies were occasionally refreshed with WT male mice from Charles River Laboratories (C57BL/6NCrl) for breeding with Mecp2 tm1.1Jae/+ female mice. Genotypes of the resulting offspring were validated by PCR of DNA collected from tail clips. Mutant male mice (Mecp2 Jae/y ) along with their WT littermates were collected after postnatal day 60 (P60+), which represents the time point when Mecp2-deficient males are considered to be “symptomatic.” We define symptomatic as exhibiting hind limb clasping upon suspension from tail and decreased mobility [40], both of which were observed in all Mecp2-deficient males at the time of collection. For both RNA sequencing and proteomics experiments (methods outlined below), an n of 4 biological replicates per genotype were used, with WT littermate animals used as controls. The number of biological replicates was chosen based on a previous study examining the relationship between the number of biological replicates, RNA-sequencing depth, and statistical power [42].

RNA and protein isolation

Animals were anesthetized under CO2 followed by rapid decapitation. Whole brains were dissected in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and then separated into the cerebellum, brain stem, midbrain, and hippocampus. One hemisphere of the whole cortex was dedicated for RNA and the other for protein isolation. RNA was isolated by placing the cortical hemisphere dedicated for RNA in 1 mL of RNAlater™ solution (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific) and allowed to react at 4 °C for at least 1 week. RNA was collected using the Invitrogen™ Ambion™ PureLink™ RNA Mini Kit (Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the following modifications: (1) tissue was homogenized in 1 mL lysis buffer with β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) in a dounce homogenizer 5 times and rested on ice for 5 min, followed by another 5 rounds of homogenization; (2) approximately 15 mg of the homogenate was removed and brought up to a final volume of 600 μL in lysis buffer with β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich), then re-homogenized as described above. RNA was eluted in 30 μL of autoclaved and filtered Mill-Q® water. Proteins were isolated from the remaining cortical hemisphere in ice-cold lysis buffer (100 mM Tris base, pH 7.5 at room temperature, 1% (w/v) SDS) with protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 3 (Sigma-Aldrich, product numbers P8340 and P0044, respectively) such that the final concentration was 40 mg/mL. Lysates were sonicated using the Model 120 Sonic Dismembrator (Fisher Scientific) for 7 s at 70% amplitude, pulse 20 s, and rest 50 s for 2 cycles. Protein lysates were centrifuged to pellet debris. The supernatant was removed into another tube and quantified using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Pierce/Thermo Scientific).

RNA sequencing

RNA samples were submitted to the Genomics Core Laboratory in the Heflin Center of Genomic Sciences at the University of Alabama at Birmingham for sample preparation and sequencing. The samples were first DNase-treated and assessed for total RNA quality using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, followed by 2 rounds of polyadenylate positive (poly A+) selection and conversion to cDNA. RNA sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 using the latest versions of sequencing reagents and flow cells, providing up to 300 GB of sequence information per flow cell. TruSeq library generation kits were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina). Library construction consisted of random fragmentation of the poly A+ mRNA, followed by cDNA production using random primers. The ends of the cDNA were repaired, A-tailed, and adaptors ligated for indexing (up to 12 different barcodes per lane) during the sequencing runs. The cDNA libraries were quantitated using qPCR in a Roche LightCycler 480 with the Kapa Biosystems kit for library quantitation (Kapa Biosystems) prior to cluster generation. Clusters were generated to yield approximately 725K–825K clusters/mm2. Cluster density and quality were determined during the run after the first base addition parameters were assessed. Paired-end 2 × 50 bp sequencing runs were performed to align the cDNA sequences to the reference genome mouse mm10. Approximately 15 million paired 50 bp reads were obtained per sample.

RNA-Seq bioinformatics analysis

All RNA-Seq fastq reads (GEO Series accession number GSE96684) were processed in the Galaxy platform [43]. First, raw RNA-Seq reads were concatenated using the “Concatenate datasets tail-to-head” tool. The concatenated raw fastq reads were then trimmed using Trim Galore! (Galaxy version 0.4.2; [44]) to remove adapter sequences and low-quality base pairs with the following parameters: selected “paired-end” library; trimming reads—automatic detection; trims 1 bp off every read from its 3′ end—yes; no removal of N bp from 3′ end of reads 1 and 2 (respectively); and all other settings left at default. Trimmed fastq reads were then run through FastQC (Galaxy version 0.65; [45]) for additional quality control measures. Following quality control, the reads were aligned to the mouse mm10 reference genome using TopHat (Galaxy version 2.1.0; [46, 47]) using the following parameters: mean inner distance between mate pairs—175; standard deviation for distance between mate pairs—20; report discordant pair alignments—yes; and all other settings left at default. Aligned reads were assembled using Cufflinks (Galaxy version 0.0.7; [46, 48]) using the following parameters: max intron length—300,000; min isoform fraction—0.1; pre-mRNA fraction—0.15; perform quartile normalization—yes; use reference annotation—use reference annotation, with the iGenomes UCSC mm10 genome used as the reference annotation [49]; perform bias correction—yes, reference sequence data—locally cached, using reference genome—mouse mm10; use multi-read correct—yes; and job resource parameters—left at default values. Following transcript assembly and estimated fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) abundances, each sample’s assembled transcript was merged using the Cuffmerge (Galaxy version 2.2.1.0; [46, 48]) tool with the following parameters: use reference annotation—yes, reference annotation—iGenomes UCSC mm10 genome [49]; use sequence data—no; minimum isoform fraction—0.05; and job resources parameters—left at default. Finally, Cuffdiff (Galaxy version 2.2.1.3; [46, 48]) was used to calculate statistical changes in gene expression using the following parameters: transcripts—output file from Cuffmerge step; omit tabular data sets—no; generate SQLite—yes; input data type—SAM/BAM; condition 1—WT TopHat accepted hits files; condition 2—Mecp2 Jae/y TopHat accepted hits files; library normalization method—quartile; dispersion estimation method—per-condition; false discovery rate—0.05; minimum alignment count—100; use multi-read correct—yes; perform bias correction—yes; reference sequence data—locally cached, reference genome mouse mm10; include read group data sets—yes; include count based output files—yes; apply length correction—cufflinks effective length correction; and all other remaining parameters were left at default settings. Since poly A+ selection was utilized to generate the cDNA libraries used for RNA-Seq, any significant and differentially expressed genes that mapped to a putative non-coding gene were removed from analysis.

Proteomics

In-gel tryptic digest

An amount corresponding to 40 μg of protein based on a BCA assay with BSA as a reference standard (Pierce, Rockford, IL) was processed by SDS-PAGE using a 4–20% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The gel was run for 5 min at 120 V and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 protein stain comprised of 0.05% Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (w/v)/50% methanol (v/v)/10% acetic acid (v/v) for 30 min at room temperature. The mobility region was excised into 1-mm cubes and destained overnight in 15% methanol (v/v)/10% glacial acetic acid (v/v). On the next day, the gel slices were destained for an additional 4 h until the stain was completely removed. The gel cubes were reduced with 10 mM dithiothreitol at 60 °C for 30 min followed by alkylation with 50 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 30 min. The reducing and alkylating buffers were removed, and the gel cubes were placed into acetonitrile and allowed to evaporate to dryness at room temperature. Trypsin gold (Promega, Madison, WI) in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate was added to each sample at a 1:20 trypsin to total protein ratio and allowed to digest at 37 °C for 16 h. The digests were aliquoted into fresh tubes, and extraction buffer consisting of 50% acetonitrile (v/v)/5% formic acid (v/v) was added and left at room temperature for 2 h and then combined with each sample’s overnight trypsin digest. Samples were vacuum centrifuged to dryness, resuspended in 0.1% formic acid (v/v), and BCA assayed with undigested BSA as a reference to determine peptide total concentrations.

Data-independent acquisition LC-MS/MS

In each liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) injection, 1 μg of peptides was separated on a NanoAcquity UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA). A 3-μL injection was loaded in 5% acetonitrile (v/v)/0.1% formic acid (v/v) at a 4 μL/min flowrate for 4 min onto a 100-μm I.D. fused-silica pre-column packed with 2 cm of 5 μm (200 Å) Magic C18AQ (Bruker-Michrom, Auburn, CA) and eluted using a flowrate of 300 nL/min onto a 75-μm-inner-diameter analytical column packed with 25 cm of 3 μm (100 Å) Magic C18AQ particles to a gravity-pulled tip. A linear gradient was applied to elute peptides from 100% solvent A consisting of 0.1% formic acid (v/v) to 35% solvent B comprised of acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in 90 min. Ions were introduced by positive electrospray ionization via liquid junction into a Q-Exactive hybrid mass spectrometer (Thermo, Waltham, MA) operating in data-independent acquisition (DIA) mode. A total of 6 injections were performed to analyze each sample corresponding to the precursor m/z ranges 501–552, 553.5–604.5, 606–657, 658.5–709.5, 711–762, and 763.5–814.5 using a modified application of the precursor acquisition independent from ion count (PAcIFIC) approach [50]. The sequential inclusion list for each precursor m/z range included 35 precursor m/z centers and stepped 1.5 m/z per inclusion list center to provide an overlap of 1 m/z between each inclusion list precursor m/z range assayed. Centroid MS/MS data were acquired at 17,500 FWHM resolution with an AGC target value of 2e5, a maximum IT fill time of 80 ms, an isolation width of 2.5 m/z, a fixed first mass of 140 m/z, normalized collision energy of 27, and default charge state of 2.

Proteomics data analysis

Protalizer version 2.1 (Vulcan Analytical, Birmingham, AL) was used to automate the analysis of DIA data and combine the results from the 6 injections per sample (ProteomeXchange Consortium/PRIDE partner repository [51, 52] data set identifier PXD006460). Peptides and source proteins were identified by an X! Tandem Sledgehammer MS/MS database search following deconvolution of MS/MS spectra as previously described by retaining fragment ions within 70% of the maximum intensity of each fragment ion when compared across sequential MS/MS scans using a 0.01 m/z tolerance [53]. The mouse Swiss-Prot reference proteome was used for all searches that was downloaded on March 17, 2015, and contained 6704 sequences (not including reversed sequence decoys used to determine the false discovery rate). A precursor tolerance of 2.5 m/z and fragment tolerance of 20 ppm were applied with a maximum of 2 missed cleavages and false protein discovery rate of 1%. Potential modifications included in each search were oxidation of M residues, pyro-glutamic acid at N-terminal E and Q residues, N-terminal acetylation, and phosphorylation at S, T, and Y sites. Carbamidomethylation of C residues was searched as a fixed modification. Peptides assigned to different proteins in separate files were assigned to a single top match determined by the protein entry most often assigned by X! Tandem. Relative quantification of peptides was performed by MS2 area-under the-curve (AUC) chromatogram intensities using a minimum of 5 and maximum of 9 b/y fragment ions in either a  +1 or +2 charge state with intensities at least 10% of the strongest fragment ion assigned to each peptide in MS/MS spectra. Peptides not consistently detected in each file that were acquired with the same PAcIFIC assay were extracted in the files they were not detected using normalized retention time as described elsewhere [53]. The intensities of peptide MS2 chromatograms were normalized by up to 25 peptides quantified in each sample that had the least amount of intensity variation and the most similar retention time to correct for retention time-dependent matrix effects [53]. The normalized MS2 chromatograms for each peptide were then placed in a relative scale with 1 being the smallest amount detected.

To calculate protein-level relative abundance across the Mecp2 Jae/y and WT mice, each peptide assigned to a protein that was detected in every file compared was used for quantification. Proteins lacking at least one peptide detected in every sample were quantified with all the peptides that had MS2 chromatograms detected in any file. The median relative abundance of multiple peptides used for protein-level quantification was applied to determine the overall relative protein abundance of the Mecp2 Jae/y mice versus WT. Statistical significance of protein-level differences was determined using an unpaired t-test for all the peptides used to quantify each protein using a p-value cutoff of p < 0.1 as previously applied [54].

Western blotting

Lysates were boiled in 2× sample loading buffer (100 mM Tris base, pH 6.8, 4% SDS in Laemmli-sodium dodecyl sulfate, 600 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 200 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 20% glycerol) in a 1:1 ratio for 15 min at 60 °C. A final concentration of 10 μg per sample was loaded into a 4–20% gradient pre-cast mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ gel (Bio-Rad) and ran at 200 V in 1× running buffer (24.76 mM Tris base, 190 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS).

For blots tested for RNPEP, QDPR, and CIRBP protein expression, gels were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using the Trans-blot turbo system (Bio-Rad), mixed molecular weight protocol (2.5 A, 25 V for 7 min), followed by blocking with LI-COR® blocking buffer at a 1:1 ratio with TBS. The blots were incubated with primary polyclonal chicken anti-GAPDH (EMD Millipore) at 1:2500 for 15 min at room temperature, while the remaining primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C: polyclonal rabbit anti-RNPEP (Proteintech) at 1:1000, polyclonal rabbit anti-QDPR (Proteintech) at 1:1000, and polyclonal rabbit anti-CIRBP (Proteintech). All secondary antibodies were either goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-chicken (LI-COR®), all incubated at 1:10,000 for 1 h at room temperature. Imaging was performed on a LI-COR® Odyssey machine with 1 or 1.5 intensity on both the 680 and 800 channels. All rabbit antibodies were imaged in the 680 channels and chicken in 800.

For blots tested for MeCP2, NEFM, mGluR3, and HSPH1 protein expression, the gels were transferred to an Immobilon-P PVDF membrane (EMD Millipore) for 1 h at 100 V in 1× transfer buffer (250.7 mM Tris base, 190 mM glycine, 20% methanol) with an ice pack at room temperature, followed by blocking with 10% non-fat dry milk/0.1% Tween-20/TBS (10% milk-TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were initially incubated with primary antibody chicken anti-GAPDH at 1:2000 (EMD Millipore) for 1 h at room temperature, washed 3 times in 10% milk-TBST, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with secondary antibody goat anti-chicken at 1:2000 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Blots were then washed 3 times with 10% milk-TBST and imaged with Classico chemiluminescent reagent (EMD Millipore) using an autoradiography film developing system (Denville Scientific). The blots were then individually probed with the following antibodies and conditions: mouse anti-MeCP2 at 1:2000 (Sigma) for 2 h at room temperature, rabbit anti-NEFM at 1:1000 (Proteintech) for 2 h at room temperature, rabbit anti-mGluR3 at 1:500 (Alomone labs) overnight at 4 °C, and rabbit anti-HSPH1 at 1:150 (Novus Biologicals) overnight at 4 °C. The respective secondary antibodies were incubated with blots at 1:2000 for 1 h at room temperature: goat anti-mouse (Santa Cruz) and goat anti-rabbit (Santa Cruz). Protein quantification for all blots was performed using Image Studio Lite (LI-COR®) and Origin2015 (OriginLab). Relative protein amounts per antibody tested were normalized to GAPDH expression in the same lane.

Pathway analysis

Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis (IPA®; Qiagen) was used to identify significant biological pathways in both RNA-Seq and proteomics data sets. A list of detected genes and detected proteins (including post-translational modifications) was used as the data input for both individual and comparison pathway analyses, using a q < 0.05 cutoff for the gene pathway and p < 0.1 cutoff for the protein pathway analyses [54] such that only significant genes/proteins were considered for significant pathways. The “User dataset” option was chosen to use each individual detected gene/protein data set as the “reference set” for which to generate significant pathways. Pathways from the “diseases and biological functions” category were used for comparison analyses. Fisher’s t-test of p < 0.05 (or −Log10 p-value > 1.3) was used to determine statistical significance of a pathway.

Results

Global gene expression in symptomatic Mecp2 Jae/y whole cortex

We began our studies by performing RNA-Seq in whole cortical tissue obtained from the Mecp2 Jae/y murine model of RTT. Previous studies have analyzed the transcriptome of RTT mice; however, analysis performed in the same affected brain region in the same animal model allowed us to make general comparisons across RNA-Seq and proteomics platforms. While each data set offers unique insight into the disease, the comparison of the two allows us to make general assumptions that (1) differentially expressed “hits” common to both platforms possibly share a transcriptional mechanism of dysregulation and (2) proteins differentially expressed without a similar change in gene expression may indicate differences in either protein stability or posttranscriptional regulation. We chose to analyze whole cortex (WCX) in a Mecp2 Jae/y murine model of RTT because MeCP2 protein is highly expressed in WCX [10, 11] and has pathological characteristics of RTT [26]. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) was used to quantify gene expression of 15 million paired 50 bp reads in WT and symptomatic Mecp2 Jae/y mice (as described in the “Methods” section). We identified 391 significant, differentially expressed (DE) genes (Fig. 1a, Additional file 1). Of these 391 genes, 132 genes had increased expression and 259 had decreased expression. To assess the consistency of our data with previously published microarray and RNA-Seq studies of RTT, we compared our findings to transcriptome-based data on different species and brain regions [4, 1926, 33, 34, 55, 56]. In our data, 35 genes were identified as known RTT differentially expressed genes and are represented in Fig. 1b and Table 1. Of the 35 genes, 18 were identified in supplemental material from [4] and [34] (Table 1). Additionally, within the group of 35 identified RTT hits, we found that 66% of the DE genes had decreased expression, while 34% had increased expression (Fig. 1b, Table 1). These observations are consistent with previous studies with the exception of one gene Cacnb3. In our data set, Cacnb3 is significantly decreased; however, Tudor et al. found that this same gene was upregulated [20].
Fig. 1

Transcriptome-wide expression in Mecp2 Jae/y cortex. a. Heat map of 391 significant, differentially expressed (DE) genes. Each genotype has 4 biological replicates, where each column represents 1 biological replicate and each row represents the Log10-transformed FPKM of a significant DE gene. Biological replicates are listed in the order of how they cluster, which is indicated by the cluster dendrogram above the heat map. Genes with a false discovery rate (q-value or FDR) of < 0.05 were considered to be significantly, differentially expressed. b. Volcano plot of all the detected genes’ expression (Log2 fold change) in the Mecp2 Jae/y whole cortex transcriptome. Significant DE genes previously identified as RTT hits are highlighted in red crosses and arrows. Due to space constraints, additional genes identified in supplemental material from Chahrour et al. [4] and Veeraragavan et al. [34] were not highlighted in this volcano plot; for information on these genes, see Table 1. Dotted line indicates a q-value of 0.05, where anything above the line indicates a significant DE gene. c. Venn diagram comparing our transcriptome data to previously published microarray studies (Urdinguio et al. [24] and Tudor et al. [20]) on Mecp2 Jae/y mouse cortex. Note that in the Urdinguio study, the fold change expression was not differentiated between cortex, midbrain, and cerebellum due to their finding that there were no differences in gene expression between the 3 brain regions [24]; rather, fold change values represent combined tissue expression. Six genes were shared between the Mecp2 Jae/y transcriptome data and the Urdinguio et al. study, while 5 genes from the Tudor et al. study were shared in common with the transcriptome data. One of the targets (Fabp7) from the Tudor et al. study was also overlapped with the Urdinguio et al. study

Table 1

Significant DE genes overlapping with previously identified RTT hits

Gene targets: this study

UniProt: function keywords

Fold change

RTT gene hits: direction of expression (with references)

Aacs*

• Molecular function: ligase

• Biological process: fatty acid metabolism; lipid metabolism

• Ligand: ATP-binding; nucleotide-binding

− 0.79

Decrease4

Aldh1a1*

• Molecular function: oxidoreductase

• Ligand: NAD

− 0.67

Decrease4

Arhgdig

Molecular function: GTPase activation

− 0.69

Decrease 2

Auts2

N/A

1.40

Increase7

C1qa

• Biological process: complement pathways; immunity; innate immunity

− 0.76

Decrease7

Cacnb3

Molecular function: calcium channel; ion channel; voltage-gated channel

Biological process: calcium transport; ion transport; transport

Ligand: calcium

− 0.79

Increase 2

Calb1

Ligand: calcium; metal-binding; vitamin D

− 0.79

Decrease 5

Calr*

• Molecular function: chaperone

• Ligand: calcium; lectin; metal-binding

− 0.80

Decrease8

Dgkg*

• Molecular function: kinase; transferase

• Ligand: ATP-binding; calcium; metal-binding; nucleotide-binding; zinc

1.42

Increase4, 8

Ephx2*

• Molecular function: hydrolase

• Biological process: aromatic hydrocarbons catabolism; detoxification; lipid metabolism

• Ligand: magnesium; metal-binding

− 0.71

Decrease4

Fabp7

Biological process: transport

Ligand: lipid-binding

− 0.39

Decrease 2,5

Fkbp5

Molecular function: chaperone; isomerase; rotamase

1.81

Increase 3,4,5,7,8

Gabra3

• Molecular function: chloride channel; ion channel; ligand-gated ion channel; receptor

• Biological process: ion transport; transport

• Ligand: chloride

− 0.81

Decrease6

Gfra1*

• Molecular function: receptor

1.26

Increase4, 8

Grm3*

• Molecular function: G-protein coupled receptor; receptor; transducer

− 0.63

Decrease4

Hpcal4*

• Ligand: calcium; metal-binding

− 0.69

Decrease4, 8

Hsph1

• Biological process: stress response

• Ligand: ATP-binding; nucleotide-binding

− 0.80

Decrease3

Itm2a

N/A

− 0.73

Decrease 5

Mecp2

• Molecular function: DNA-binding; repressor

• Biological process: transcription; transcription regulation

− 0.66

Decrease1, 4

Msmo1 /

Sc4mol

Molecular function: oxidoreductase

Biological process: lipid biosynthesis; lipid metabolism; steroid biosynthesis; steroid metabolism; steroid biosynthesis; sterol metabolism

Ligand: iron; NAD

− 0.77

Decrease 5

Myo1b*

• Molecular function: actin-binding; calmodulin-binding; motor protein; myosin

• Ligand: ATP-binding; nucleotide-binding

1.32

Increase4, 8

Pcsk1

• Molecular function: hydrolase; protease; serine protease

• Ligand: calcium

− 0.74

Decrease6

Pdia4*

• Molecular function: isomerase

− 0.71

Decrease4, 8

Plagl1

Ligand: metal-binding; zinc

1.37

Increase 5

Prkcg*

• Molecular function: kinase; serine/threonine-protein kinase; transferase

• Biological process: biological rhythms

• Ligand: ATP-binding; calcium; metal-binding; nucleotide-binding; zinc

− 0.82

Decrease8

Pvalb

Molecular function: muscle protein

Ligand: calcium; metal-binding

1.27

Increase 2

Pygm

• Molecular function: glycosyltransferase; transferase

• Biological process: carbohydrate metabolism; glycogen metabolism

• Ligand: nucleotide-binding; pyridoxal phosphate

1.29

Increase6

Qdpr*

• Molecular function: oxidoreductase

• Biological process: tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis

• Ligand: NADP

− 0.74

Decrease4

Rnpep*

• Molecular function: aminopeptidase; hydrolase; metalloprotease; protease

• Ligand: metal-binding; zinc

− 0.78

Decrease4

Sgk1

Molecular function: kinase; serine/threonine-protein kinase; transferase

Biological process: apoptosis; stress response

Ligand: ATP-binding; nucleotide-binding

1.37

Increase 2,3

Slc24a4*

• Biological process: antiport; calcium transport; ion transport; olfaction; potassium transport; sensory transduction; sodium transport; symport; transport

• Ligand: calcium; potassium; sodium

1.58

Increase4

Slc9a3r1*

• Biological process: Wnt signaling pathway

− 0.74

Decrease8

Sun2*

• Biological process: meiosis

1.42

Increase8

Ugp2*

• Molecular function: nucleotidyltransferase; transferase

• Ligand: magnesium; metal-binding

− 0.73

Decrease4

Zmat4*

• Molecular function: DNA-binding

• Ligand: metal-binding; zinc

1.5

Increase8

First column represents the significant DE gene identified in this study, along with the UniProt function keyword(s) for each gene (second column) and the Log2 fold change expression of the gene in our data set (third column). DE genes with an asterisk (*) represent genes identified in supplemental material from Chahrour et al. [4] and Veeraragavan et al. [34]. All function keywords were found from the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database [131] per respective DE gene. DE genes without a published function keyword in the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database are represented as “N/A.” The last column represents the previously identified RTT hits’ fold change expression direction, with each superscript representing that gene’s respective references. Superscript references are as follows: (1) Amir et al. [2], (2) Tudor et al. [20], (3) Nuber et al. [21], (4) Chahrour et al. [4], (5) Urdinguio et al. [24], (6) Ben-Shachar et al. [25], (7) Lin et al. [33], and (8) Veeraragavan et al. [34]. Rows in bold font represent previously identified RTT hits that were found to be specifically DE in the cortex

We then focused on comparisons of our RNA-Seq data to microarray studies also performed in Mecp2-deficient cortex [20, 24]. We specifically focused on these two studies for a number of reasons. First, studies have shown brain tissue region and cell type-specific gene and protein expression differences [30, 5760]. While we do not negate the importance of other transcriptomic studies performed in the RTT field, we chose to compare our data set to studies performed in the same MeCP2 animal model, tissue region, and time point. A RNA-Seq study by Li et al. meets this criteria [9]; however, this study only reported upregulated genes and utilized different bioinformatics approaches. We found 175 upregulated genes in the Li et al. study were also present in our data set. Of these, 84/175 genes were also significantly upregulated in our data set (p < 0.05). We found 5 out of the 12 genes identified in the Tudor et al. microarray study and 6 out of the 20 genes identified in the Urdinguio et al. study were also significant DE genes in our data set (Fig. 1c). A common statistical significance threshold in RNA-sequencing studies is a q-value less than 0.05, which is meant to reduce the number of false positives observed, but may also underestimate biologically relevant changes. Reducing the significance threshold stringency to p < 0.05 in our data set, we identified an additional 2 genes from the Tudor et al. (7/12) and 2 genes from the Urdinguio et al. (8/20) study. Our RNA-Seq data correlates better with the individual microarray studies than these two studies correlate to each other, which is notable given strain differences between each of the individual studies, and that the Urdinguio et al. study utilized tissue pooled from three brain regions from the Mecp2 tm1.1Bird/y mouse model [24]. These genes and their putative functions as well as direction of expression levels for each hit are shown in Table 1. We identified an additional 19 gene targets previously found to be RTT gene hits in our data set that had a p-value of less than 0.05, but did not meet the false discovery rate, or FDR/q-value, cutoff of 0.05 (Additional file 2). Collectively, this suggests that our data is in concordance with previous literature on Mecp2-deficient mice.

In addition to known RTT hits, we also found a number of significant DE genes that have been previously identified as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) candidate genes (q < 0.05). For example, mutations in Auts2 [61, 62], Shank1–3 [63], and Foxp1 [64, 65] have been found in various ASD patient cases. In our data set, Auts2 and Foxp1 are significantly increased by 0.49 and 0.29 fold, respectively, while Shank1–3 are all decreased (Shank1: − 0.53 fold, Shank2: − 0.34 fold, Shank3: − 0.37 fold) (Table 1, Additional file 1). The gene expression changes observed in our data are robust, as many were identified across multiple models, different brain regions, and numerous species. Importantly, this also provides validation in utilizing this data set as an appropriate resource for comparing RNA-protein expression similarities in the RTT model.

Recent work demonstrated that MeCP2 selectively represses gene expression of long genes [30, 32]. These two studies also showed long genes are enriched in neurons and hypothesized that neuronal dysfunction in RTT could be in part due to repression of long gene expression [30, 32]. Recent studies have also indicated that disruption of long genes could also contribute to ASD pathogenesis [6668]. For example, one study has shown that a heterozygous knockout of the autism candidate gene Chd8 led to an increase in dysregulated long gene expression [66], while another study found many ASD candidate genes are long genes [67]. Interestingly, recent studies have shown that topoisomerase inhibitors can regulate the expression of long genes in different ASD models [67, 68], suggesting that topoisomerase inhibitors could serve as a potential therapeutic for autism. Collectively, these studies highlight the need to understand the relationship between long gene expression and ASD and other ASD-related disorders such as RTT.

Given that MeCP2 is expressed in all CNS cell types, we extended earlier studies exploring the relationship between gene size and fold change expression within cell type-specific DE genes in our data. Accordingly, we next evaluated if the 391 identified significant DE genes in symptomatic Mecp2 Jae/y mice were enriched in a specific CNS cell type using a publicly available database of purified cortical CNS cell types [69]. The criteria for this comparison were as follows: (1) a gene which demonstrated a 3-fold or greater enrichment in 1 cell relative to all others was considered cell type enriched and (2) all other genes that varied less than 3-fold in any one cell type were considered to be non-specific. Using these criteria, 68% of the DE genes were not enriched in any cell type (Fig. 2a, Additional file 3). The other 32% of DE genes segregated into one enriched cell population. Of the DE genes associated with a specific cell type, 31 were enriched in neurons, 46 in astrocytes, 10 in microglia, 26 in oligodendrocytes (includes oligodendrocyte precursor cells, newly formed oligodendrocytes, and myelinating oligodendrocytes), and 14 in endothelial cells (Fig. 2a, Additional file 3). Additional comparisons to a second CNS cell type-specific database [60] further confirmed gene expression is disrupted across multiple cell populations in the symptomatic RTT brain (Additional file 4).
Fig. 2

Cell type-specific gene expression correlation. a. Mecp2 Jae/y cortex significant DE genes compared to top 500 CNS cell type-specific genes based on the Zhang et al. study [69], which is also provided as a public database. Each pie slice lists the number of DE genes associated with each CNS cell type. b. Fold change expression and gene size correlation in the Mecp2 Jae/y transcriptome. Significant DE genes were plotted by Log2 fold change (FC) expression (y-axis) and gene size (x-axis; in units of kilobase (kb)) according to their respective CNS cell type distribution (based on part A). Expression and gene size correlations were also examined as a whole (bottom scatter plot in black). This relationship is also represented to the right of each scatter plot based on the number of short (defined as being less than 100 kb; gray) and long (defined as being greater than 100 kb; turquoise) genes that are either repressed (i.e., decreased expression) or activated (i.e., increased expression) in the Mecp2 Jae/y cortex

Based on the criteria outlined above, we cannot rule out the possibility that a gene we termed “not enriched in any cell type” is dysregulated in neurons. For example, the gene Camk1 has strong associations with neuronal transcription and synaptic activity. However, based on our and the Zhang et al. criteria [69], Camk1 is categorized as a “non-cell type enriched” gene. The non/cell type-specific hits may be a direct result of MeCP2 deficiency in neurons, MeCP2 deficiency in other CNS cell populations, or alternatively are downstream of MeCP2 binding in one or multiple CNS populations. We also cannot exclude the possibility that alterations observed in gene and protein expression in non-neuronal cell populations are due to the disease severity at the time point these experiments were performed. However, when we did a similar gene cell type-specific comparison between Chahrour et al.'s study and Zhang et al.'s database, we also observed a similar cell type-enriched distribution as the data presented in our study (data not shown), decreasing the possibility that our observed expression changes are due to disease severity.

We defined short genes as being less than 100 kb and long genes as larger than 100 kb based on prior studies [32] and calculated gene length based on the chromosomal location provided by the Cuffdiff differential gene expression output file. We found 81% of the total list of significant DE genes was short in our data (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5). Of these short genes, 237 had decreased and 79 had increased gene expression. Similar to previous work [30, 32], we found 71% (53/75) of the long genes exhibit increased gene expression (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5). Although the majority of genes in our data set are short and repressed, the neuronal-enriched DE genes in our data support previous studies showing a bias for over-expressed long genes in neuronal populations [30] (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5). Additionally, increased long gene expression was observed in oligodendrocyte-enriched and non-cell type-specific DE genes (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5). In contrast, the majority of astrocyte-enriched DE genes showed decreased gene expression, in which 92% (36/39) of short genes and all 7 long genes exhibited decreased gene expression (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5). Similar trends were observed in endothelial-enriched DE genes, where 71% (10/14) of the genes were short and decreased (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5). Furthermore, within the microglial-enriched DE gene group, all 10 genes are short and have decreased gene expression (Fig. 2b, Additional file 5). Together, these data provide an additional dimension of cell type-specific gene expression changes in Mecp2 Jae/y animals.

Protein expression in symptomatic Mecp2 Jae/y whole cortex

To gain a more complete view of cellular and molecular dysfunction in RTT, we examined global protein abundance changes in symptomatic Mecp2 Jae/y whole cortex lysates using a DIA LC-MS/MS proteomics approach (see the “Methods” section; [50, 53]). We identified 465 significant protein changes out of 4789 total quantified proteins. Of the 465 significant proteins, 299 proteins had increased fold changes in RTT mice while 166 had decreased fold changes compared to WT (Fig. 3a, Additional file 6). To demonstrate the robustness and sensitivity of the expression changes observed in our proteomics data set, we performed Western blot analysis on 3 top-ranking proteins based on large fold change differences (fold change greater than ± 3; MeCP2, CIRBP, RNPEP) along with 4 proteins with smaller fold change differences (fold change less than ± 3; HSPH1, NEFM, QDPR, mGluR3) (Additional files 6 and 7). As expected, the MeCP2 protein was one of the most highly decreased and significant proteins in the data set and was also significantly decreased by Western blot analysis (Additional files 6 and 7). Western blot analysis also confirmed that the remaining 6 targets were significantly different in the Mecp2-deficient cortex (Additional file 7). Additionally, representative mass spectrometry chromatograms confirmed qualitative changes in peptides detected in WT versus Mecp2-deficient cortical lysates (Additional file 7). Collectively, these results lend support to the robustness and sensitivity of our proteomics data set.
Fig. 3

Proteome-wide expression in Mecp2 Jae/y cortex. a. Heat map of 460 significant, abundantly expressed proteins. Each column represents pooled biological replicates per genotype (n = 4), and each row represents the relative abundance fold change of an individual protein (with or without a PTM). Proteins with a p-value of < 0.1 were considered differentially abundant. b. Volcano plot of all the detected proteins’ expression (Log2 fold change) in the Mecp2 Jae/y whole cortex proteome. Dotted line indicates a p-value of 0.1, where anything above the line indicates a significant protein. Previously identified RTT hits are highlighted in red, blue, or purple filled circles. Red circles denote that the significant protein was identified from a transcriptome-based gene expression study, blue circles denote identification from a proteomics-based study, and purple circles denote identification from a non-omics-based study. Due to space constraints, only the selected RTT protein hits identified from proteomics and non-omics-based studies were highlighted in this volcano plot. For a comprehensive list of all the identified RTT protein hits, refer to Additional file 8. c. Pie chart of significant proteins compared to top 500 cell type-specific genes based on the Zhang et al. study [69]. All significant proteins were included in the analysis. Each pie slice lists the number of significant proteins associated with each CNS cell type

We next examined whether any of the significant proteins were previously identified RTT hits using the same criteria as outlined in the RNA-Seq analysis section. Of the 465 significant proteins, 37 were identified as previously published RTT targets, with the majority identified from previous transcriptome studies (Fig. 3b, Additional file 8). Three of the 37 hits (clusterin, Apo-J/Clu; alpha-1-antitrypsin 1–1, AAT/Serpina1a; and apolipoprotein A-I, Apo-AI/Apoa1; Fig. 3b, Additional file 8) were identified from the limited proteomics studies published in RTT [3639] and have decreased expression. Two significantly increased proteins in our data set (transcriptional activator protein Pur-alpha, Purα/Pura, ↑1.19 fold; and core histone macro-H2A.2, mH2A2/H2afy2, ↑1.43 fold; Fig. 3b, Additional file 8) were previously identified as MeCP2 interacting proteins [4] as was FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5; Additional file 8) [21].

We identified several groups of differentially abundant proteins that fall into broad categories that relate to MeCP2 function, cellular dysfunction, and disease biology (Tables 2 and 3). For instance, several proteins related to RNA metabolism, including heterogeneous nuclear riboproteins (hnRNP a0, hnRNP D0, hnRNP D-like, hnRNP H2, hnRNP L), spliceosome components (CD2BP2, CDC5L), and a transcriptional repressor (mH2A2), were observed (Table 2). Each of these proteins was significantly upregulated in RTT tissue relative to WT. In particular, cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRBP), an RNA-binding protein upregulated in response to hypoxia [70], shows one of the largest fold increases in our data set (4.3-fold; Table 2). Interestingly, this protein has previously been shown to be upregulated in RTT tissue [21], although mRNA levels do not appear to be affected ([71] and our data). Similar findings were previously reported in RTT where multiple synaptic proteins showed significant changes in protein expression while no observed changes were found at the transcript level [72]. These data suggest examining global protein changes in RTT provide supplementary information to transcriptomic studies.
Table 2

Differentially abundant proteins associated with RNA metabolism and proteostasis

Gene name

Protein description

FC

p-value

General putative function

RNA metabolism

H2afy2

Core histone macro-H2A.2 (mH2A2)

1.8

0.050

Gene repression

Cdc5l

Cell division cycle 5-like protein

2.2

0.013

mRNA splicing

Cd2bp2

CD2 antigen cytoplasmic tail-binding protein 2

1.8

0.072

mRNA splicing

Hnrnpa0

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A0

2.0

0.076

RNA-binding protein

Hnrnpd

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) D0

1.4

0.029

RNA-binding protein

Hnrnpdl

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) D-like

2.1

0.024

RNA-binding protein

Hnrnph2

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) H2

1.5

0.034

RNA-binding protein

Hnrnpl

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) L

1.8

0.077

RNA-binding protein

Cirbp

Cold-inducible RNA-binding protein

4.3

0.047

RNA-binding protein

Ddx21

Nucleolar RNA helicase 2

2.9

0.009

rRNA transcription, processing, and modification

Hp1bp3

Heterochromatin protein 1-binding protein 3

2.1

0.057

Transcription regulation

Proteostasis

Impact

Protein IMPACT

1.8

0.002

Translational activation

Uchl5

Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L5

1.6

0.037

Deubiquitylation

Adrm1

Proteasomal ubiquitin receptor ADRM1

3.0

0.007

Enhances Uchl5

Ublcp1

Ubiquitin-like domain-containing CTD phosphatase 1

3.5

0.068

Nuclear proteasome activity

Cryab

Alpha-crystallin B chain

−2.1

0.003

Chaperone-like activity

Hspb1

Heat shock protein beta-1 (HspB1)

−1.7

0.020

Chaperone for protein folding maintenance

Hsph1*

Heat shock protein 105 kDa

−2.1

0.004

Chaperone activity regulation

Hsp90aa1

Heat shock protein HSP 90-alpha (HSP90α)

−1.5

0.058

ATP-dependent chaperone

Hsp90ab1

Heat shock protein HSP 90-beta (HSP90β)

−1.4

0.056

ATP-dependent chaperone

Hspa4

Heat shock 70 kDa protein 4

−1.5

0.067

Molecular chaperone

Ahsa1

Activator of 90 kDa heat shock protein ATPase homolog 1

−1.3

0.059

Chaperone binding

Significant proteins (p < 0.1) that are associated with either RNA metabolism (top half of table) or proteostasis (bottom half of table) are listed by gene name (first column), followed by the full protein name (second column). For each protein, the fold change (“FC”) and p-value is provided (third and fourth columns, respectively), along with a brief description regarding the putative function of that protein (“General Putative Function”). Information regarding the putative function of each protein was obtained from the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database [131]. Gene names with an asterisk (“*”) indicates that the corresponding gene was also identified as significantly, differentially expressed (DE) in the transcriptome by a q < 0.05. Bold proteins indicate that the respective protein has been previously identified as a RTT hit and/or MeCP2 interacting protein (see text for references)

Table 3

Differentially abundant proteins associated with metabolism and S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methylation

Gene name

Protein description

FC

p-value

General putative function

Metabolism

Lss

Lanosterol synthase

8.1

0.016

Cholesterol synthesis

Aacs*

Acetoacetyl-CoA synthetase

− 1.4

0.059

Ketone body utilization

Acadvl

Very long-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, mitochondrial

1.6

0.045

Fatty acid oxidation

Ugp2 #

UTP-glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase

− 1.7

0.011

Glycogen metabolism

Acot7

Cytosolic acyl coenzyme A thioester hydrolase

− 1.3

0.087

Fatty Acyl-CoA biosynthesis

Monoamine metabolism

Qdpr #

Dihydropteridine reductase

− 1.7

0.029

Tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis

Spr*

Sepiapterin reductase

− 1.5

0.083

Tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis

Maoa

Amine oxidase [flavin-containing] A

1.4

0.096

Degradation of monoamines

S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methylation

Gamt

Guanidinoacetate N -methyltransferase

− 1.7

0.089

Creatine synthesis

Srm

Spermidine synthase (SPDSY)

− 1.5

0.024

Polyamine synthesis

Mthfd1l

Monofunctional C1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, mitochondrial

1.7

0.054

Folate synthesis

Significant proteins (p < 0.1) are listed by gene name (first column), followed by the full protein name (second column). For each protein, the fold change (“FC”) and p-value is provided (third and fourth columns, respectively), along with a brief description regarding the putative function of that protein (“General Putative Function”). Information regarding the putative function of each protein was obtained from the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database [131]. Gene names with an asterisk (“*”) indicates that the corresponding gene was also identified as significantly, differentially expressed (DE) in the transcriptome by a q < 0.05, while genes with a pound sign (“#”) indicate that gene was identified as DE in the transcriptome by a q < 0.01. Bold proteins indicate that the respective protein has been previously identified as a RTT hit and/or MeCP2 interacting protein

Our proteome data indicate cellular dysfunction in RTT may be facilitated by disrupted proteostasis (Table 2). We observed significantly decreased abundance of multiple heat shock proteins (HSPH1, HSP90α, HSP90β, and HSPA4), including the small heat shock proteins alpha-crystallin B chain (CRYAB) and HspB1 (Table 2). In support of these findings, a recent study has shown that microglia isolated from pre-symptomatic RTT female mice show decreased expression in heat shock genes [73]. Because of the important role that heat shock proteins play in regulating protein folding and stability, it is possible that expression changes in these heat shock proteins could be influencing the protein expression changes we observe in our proteomics data set. Furthermore, the protein IMPACT, which mediates translation in response to numerous cell stressors, was also upregulated in the proteome data set (1.8-fold; Table 2). Elevated physiological stress can also affect the protein expression levels of FKBP5 (elevated in response to glucocorticoid signaling [21]), the diacylglycerol-binding protein DGKγ, and the guanine nucleotide exchange factor RasGRF1 [74, 75], all of which are significantly increased in our data (Additional file 6).

Recent reports indicate altered metabolism in RTT. We observed significant expression of proteins involved in ketone body metabolism and utilization (AACS) as well as fatty acid oxidation (ACADVL) and glycogen metabolism (UGP2) (Table 3). Lanosterol synthase (LSS), a key enzyme in cholesterol synthesis, was elevated 8.1-fold in our data set (Table 3). Cholesterol synthesis has been shown to be disrupted in a suppressor screen in Mecp2-deficient mice [76]. It is conceivable that elevated LSS protein expression contributes to elevated cholesterol triglycerides and LDLs commonly observed in RTT patients [77, 78]. Our data also indicate altered monoamine metabolism as evidenced by significant downregulation of two key enzymes (QDPR, SPR) involved in the production of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin (Table 3). The product of these enzymes is tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), an essential cofactor in the production of amine neurotransmitters. Furthermore, amine oxidase A (MAOA), which catalyzes the oxidative deamination or degradation of these same neurotransmitters, is upregulated in the proteome data set (Table 3). Together, these findings provide additional support for prior studies indicating that dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin are downregulated in RTT mice and patients [79, 80].

Finally, we identified a number of significantly altered proteins associated with S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methylation (GAMT, SPDSY, and MTHFD1L; Table 3). This particular pathway converts methionine to S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), whereby the methyl group from SAM is transferred to different substrates such as DNA [81, 82]. This finding is of interest to RTT because MeCP2 binds methylated and un-methylated genomic regions to regulate gene transcription [4], and global MeCP2 methylation-binding patterns in RTT have been well documented [13, 31, 32, 83, 84]. An additional methyltransferase also had significant differential abundance between RTT and WT animals (PRMT5; Additional file 6). Methyl donor groups that are utilized by SAM-dependent methylation mechanisms include creatine, folate, folinic acid, and betaine, all of which have also been implicated in RTT [85]. Collectively, this suggests aberrant regulation of methyl donor group availability to properly regulate DNA methylation, and consequent downstream gene expression, in RTT.

Significant proteins in symptomatic Mecp2 Jae/y whole cortex are expressed in multiple CNS cell types

To determine if any of the significantly abundant proteins identified in our proteomics data set were also enriched in a specific cell type, we compared the 465 significant proteins to the same CNS cell type database as the RNA-Seq data. Similar to our DE gene findings, most significantly altered proteins were non-cell type specific (Fig. 3c, Additional file 3). Of the cell type-specific significantly regulated proteins, 12 were neuronal-enriched, 14 astrocyte-enriched, 4 microglial-enriched, 34 oligodendrocyte-enriched, and 10 endothelial-enriched (Fig. 3c). Similar to the RNA-Seq data, the proteomics data also suggest that loss of MeCP2 has downstream effects on protein expression in different CNS cell populations.

It should be noted that in our study, we have solely examined gene/protein expression in whole cortical tissue homogenate. A number of studies have identified this “dilution effect” [30, 86, 87], where certain genes in one cellular population could be masked by the gene expression from a heterogeneous cellular population. Additionally, gene and proteins typically thought of as “cell type specific” may lose their specificity in the RTT brain. Future studies examining gene and protein expression from multiple cell types simultaneously isolated from the same RTT animal model and tissue region are needed to properly address these potential confounds. We also cannot exclude the possibility that changes in gene and protein expression could be due to differences in cell population number. Future studies utilizing quantitative stereology and multi-channel immunohistochemistry should be done to examine cell counts in WT versus Mecp2-deficient brain tissue.

Transcriptome-proteome expression comparison identifies novel hits

We next compared the proteome to the RNA-Seq data set. Previous studies making similar comparisons across species reported low correlation between these two types of data [8891]. Our comparison across the transcriptomic and proteomics data resulted in low correlation (Pearson’s R of 0.12, Fig. 4a). Within the detected gene-protein matches, which we define as a detected gene having a corresponding detected protein, we identified 35 significant gene-protein matches (gene expression q < 0.05, protein expression p < 0.1) with a Pearson’s R of 0.74 (Fig. 4b and Table 4). When we relaxed the stringency in the DE gene list to p < 0.05, this value increases to 77 significant gene-protein matches with a Pearson’s R of 0.67 (Additional file 9).
Fig. 4

Transcriptome-proteome expression correlation in Mecp2 Jae/y cortex. a. Overall gene-protein expression correlation. Detected genes (7026) from the RNA-Seq data set were matched against detected proteins (4789) from the proteomics data set, resulting in a total of 3780 gene-protein matches. Each individual gene-protein match is plotted by gene fold change expression (x-axis, Mecp2 Jae/y /WT) and its corresponding protein fold change expression (y-axis, Mecp2 Jae/y /WT). Pearson’s R reports a correlation of 0.12. b. Significant gene and significant protein expression correlation. Out of the 3780 detected gene-protein matches, only 35 have both a significant gene (q < 0.05) and corresponding significant protein (p < 0.1) match. Each match is plotted by gene fold change expression (x-axis, Mecp2 Jae/y /WT) and its corresponding protein fold change expression (y-axis, Mecp2 Jae/y /WT). Pearson’s R reports a correlation of 0.74

Table 4

List of significant genes with a significant protein

Gene/protein

UniProt accession

Gene fold change

Protein fold change

RTT hit?

Putative function

Mecp2/MeCP2

Q9Z2D6

− 0.66

− 10.6

Yes1, 2

DNA binding protein; transcriptional regulator

Rnpep/RNPEP*

Q8VCT3

− 0.78

− 3.47

Yes2

Peptide catabolic process

Pdia4/ERp72*

P08003

− 0.71

− 2.22

Yes2,3

ER protein processing

Hsph1/HSPH1

Q61699

− 0.80

− 2.13

Yes4

Protein chaperone

Rnpep/RNPEP(Ac)*

Q8VCT3

− 0.78

− 2.02

Yes2

Peptide catabolic process

Aldh1a1/ALDH1A1*

P24549

− 0.67

− 1.95

Yes2

Retinal dehydrogenase

Slc9a3r1/NHERF1(P)*

P70441

− 0.74

− 1.79

Yes3

Scaffold protein

Ugt8a/UGT8

Q64676

− 0.79

− 1.76

---

Sphingolipid metabolism

Qdpr/QDPR (or DHPR)*

Q8BVI4

− 0.74

− 1.68

Yes2

Monoamine metabolism (tetrahydrobiopterin biosynthesis)

Ugp2/UGP2*

Q91ZJ5

− 0.73

− 1.67

Yes2

Glycogen synthesis

Car2/Ca2

P00920

− 0.72

− 1.61

---

Reversible hydration of carbon dioxide

Grm3/mGluR3*

Q9QYS2

− 0.63

− 1.6

Yes2

Protein coupled glutamate receptor

Ephx2/EPHX2*

P34914

− 0.71

− 1.59

Yes2

Cholesterol synthesis

Hpcal4/HPCAL4*

Q8BGZ1

− 0.69

− 1.51

Yes2,3

Calcium binding

Spr/SPR

Q64105

− 0.77

− 1.47

---

Monoamine metabolism (tetrahydrobiopterin metabolic process)

Sash1/SASH1

P59808

− 0.82

− 1.44

---

p38 MAPK and NIK/NF-kappaB signaling

Calr/CRT*

P14211

− 0.80

− 1.43

Yes3

ER calcium-binding protein

Aacs/AACS*

Q9D2R0

− 0.79

− 1.37

Yes2

Fatty acid and lipid metabolism

S1pr1/S1P1

O08530

− 0.78

− 1.28

---

Cell-cell adhesion

Slc9a3r1/NHERF1(Ac)*

P70441

− 0.74

− 1.24

Yes3

Scaffold protein

Nova1/NOVA1

Q9JKN6

1.26

1.28

---

RNA/mRNA-binding protein

Slc24a4/Nckx4*

Q8CGQ8

1.58

1.3

Yes3

K+-dependent Na+/Ca2+ exchanger

Kcnab3/Kvβ3.1

P97382

1.27

1.43

---

Voltage gated K+ channel

Me3/NADP-ME3

Q8BMF3

1.28

1.46

---

Mitochondrial NADP(+)-dependent malic enzyme

Tfrc/TfR

Q62351

1.32

1.48

---

Cell surface receptor required for iron uptake

Dgkg/DGKγ*

Q91WG7

1.42

1.51

Yes2,3

Lipid metabolism

Prkcg/PKCγ(P)*

P63318

− 0.82

1.66

Yes3

Protein kinase; LTP

Rasgrf1/RasGRF1

P27671

1.32

1.68

---

Stimulates the dissociation of GDP from RAS protein

Zmat4/ZMAT4*

Q8BZ94

1.50

1.88

Yes3

DNA/RNA and p53 binding

Myo1b/Myo1b*

P46735

1.32

2.02

Yes2,3

Actin binding; calmodulin binding

Fkbp5/FKBP5

Q64378

1.81

2.02

Yes2–6

Immunoregulation; protein trafficking

Wipf3/WIPF3

P0C7L0

1.23

2.26

---

Cytoskeleton organization

Itih3/ITI-HC3

Q61704

1.52

2.37

---

Anchor protein between hyaluronan and matrix proteins

Gfra1/GDNFRα1*

P97785

1.26

2.64

Yes2,3

RET and RAF/MAP kinase signaling cascade

Sun2/SUN2*

Q8BJS4

1.42

2.86

Yes3

Nuclear envelope protein

Significant genes were defined as having a q < 0.05, and significant proteins having a p < 0.1. Gene and protein names are provided along with the UniProt accession number, gene and protein fold change expression values (respectively), whether the gene-protein match has been previously identified as a RTT hit, and the respective putative function according to the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database [131]. DE gene-protein matches with an asterisk (*) represent genes/proteins identified in supplemental material from Chahrour et al. [4] and Veeraragavan et al. [34]. Gene-protein matches with “(Ac)” denote that the corresponding protein had a significant acetylation PTM, and a “(P)” denotes a significant phosphorylation PTM. For the RTT hit column, a “---” indicates the match has not been identified as a RTT hit prior to this study. Superscripts in the RTT hit column denote references for matches identified as a RTT hit and are as follows: (1) Amir et al. [2], (2) Chahrour et al. [4], (3) Veeraragavan et al. [34], (4) Nuber et al. [21], (5) Urdinguio et al. [24], and (6) Lin et al. [33]

We found 23 of the 35 significantly DE gene-protein matches were previously identified as RTT RNA regulatory targets (Table 4). The remaining 12 matches have not been described in previous RNA studies (Table 4). Within the gene-protein matches with similar regulatory patterns, Ephx2/EPHX2, Dgkg/DGKγ, Me3/NADP-ME3, Qdpr/QDPR, Slc24a4/SLC24A4, Ugt8a/UGT8, Aacs/AACS, Rnpep/RNPEP, and Spr/SPR are implicated in metabolic pathways (Table 4) [92100]. We also found that Itih3/ITI-HC3, Slc9a3r1/NHERF1 (both phosphorylated and acetylated modifications), and Rnpep/RNPEP are associated with protein scaffolding/stability (Table 4) [99, 101103]. Additionally, S1pr1/S1P1, Calr/CALR, Hpcal4/HPCAL4, and Rasgrf1/RasGRF1 are implicated in calcium-mediated processes (Table 4) [104107].

Pathway analysis in transcriptome and proteome implicate similar biological pathways

In an attempt to understand the underlying biology of disrupted genes and proteins, we utilized Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis (IPA) on the protein and RNA data sets. For a comprehensive list of all identified pathways in the individual transcriptome and proteome data sets as well as the corresponding genes and proteins in each pathway, see Additional file 10. To exemplify the diversity of identified significant pathways, we highlight functional categories that are similar or shared between the transcriptome and proteome data sets in Figs. 5 and 6. First, we identified pathways associated with general cellular and molecular dysfunction. This included categories such as cell cycle, cell components/structure/general function, and lipids and metabolism (Fig. 5a-c, Additional file 10). For the cell cycle category, 36% (4/11) of the identified pathways are associated with G2 and G2/M phase, which were found exclusively in the proteomics data set (Fig. 5a, Additional file 10). Over 80% of the proteins associated with these specific pathways had significantly increased expression, suggesting hypersensitivity and/or an accumulation of cells in the G2/M phases, a phenomenon previously observed in RTT primary human fibroblasts [108110].
Fig. 5

Transcriptome and proteome general cellular and molecular pathways in Mecp2 Jae/y cortex. Selected biological pathways that are both shared and unique to the transcriptome (R) and proteome (P) data sets are grouped by broad categories associated with general cellular/molecular function: (a) cell cycle, (b) cellular components/structure/general function, and (c) lipids and metabolism. Respective pathways are plotted by −Log10 p-value, where a value of 1.3 or greater represents a p-value of at least p < 0.05; non-significant (NS) pathways are denoted in white. The direction of gene (gray bars) and/or protein (black bars) expression changes associated with each respective pathway are represented as a percent expression to the right of the heat map, where a value greater than 0 indicates increased expression and a value less than 0 indicates decreased expression. The percent expression was calculated by taking the number of genes/proteins with significant increased or decreased expression divided by the total sum of significant genes/proteins assigned to the respective pathway. Note in part B, the abbreviation “AC” in the “G-protein signaling, AC inhibiting pathway” stands for “adenylate cyclase.” For a comprehensive list of all pathways and associated significant genes/proteins identified in both the transcriptome and proteome data sets, see Additional file 10

Fig. 6

Transcriptome and proteome cell type-specific pathways in Mecp2 Jae/y cortex. Selected biological pathways that are both shared and unique to the transcriptome (R) and proteome (P) data sets are grouped by broad categories associated with CNS and general cell type specific function: (a) neuronal functions, (b) glial functions, (c) immunological/inflammation functions, and (d) blood/blood vessel/vasculature. Respective pathways are plotted by −Log10 p-value, where a value of 1.3 or greater represents a p-value of at least p < 0.05; non-significant (NS) pathways are denoted in white. The direction of gene (gray bars) and/or protein (black bars) expression changes associated with each respective pathway are represented as a percent expression to the right of the heat map, where a value greater than 0 indicates increased expression and a value less than 0 indicates decreased expression. The percent expression was calculated as described in Fig. 5. Note in part B, the abbreviation “EAE” stands for “experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis”; in part C, the abbreviation “APCs” in the pathways “Immune response of APCs” and “Cell movement of APCs” stands for “antigen presenting cells.” For a comprehensive list of all pathways and associated significant genes/proteins identified in both the transcriptome and proteome data sets, see Additional file 10

Within the cell components/structure/general function category, we found a number of pathways related to cell death, tissue/cellular morphology, and G-protein signaling shared between the transcriptome and proteome (Fig. 5b, Additional file 10). In the RTT brain, the primary morphologic change in humans is reduced brain size [111]. Additional morphological changes include simplified dendritic arborizations and altered spine density and morphology [41, 112]. A recent study also identified reduced astrocyte branching and overall process length [72]. Supporting this, pathway analysis identified several disrupted pathways associated with tissue and cellular morphology such as “morphology of cerebral cortex”, “abnormal morphology of cells”, “formation of intermediate filaments”, “quantity of plasma membrane projections”, and “differentiation of cells” (Fig. 5b, Additional file 10). Additionally, pathway analysis supports previous findings that metabolites including glucose [113115], lipids/phospholipids [77, 78, 80, 115117], TCA cycle intermediates [115], biogenic amines [79, 80], glutamate [80, 117], creatine [80, 85], and steroids such as cholesterol and glucocorticoids [76, 78, 114, 118120] are aberrantly regulated in RTT (Fig. 5c, Additional file 10).

Recent interest in different neural cell types in RTT prompted us to examine dysfunction in cell type-specific pathways. Given the wealth of information on neuronal dysfunction in RTT, we unsurprisingly identified disrupted pathways associated with synaptic/neurotransmission, neuronal morphology, and development. Proteome pathway analysis also indicated disrupted conduction and neuronal structure/organization (Fig. 6a). These pathways and expression trends are consistent with previously published work in RTT [41, 111]. Within the glial functions group, we found the majority of pathways in both the transcriptome and proteome data sets are associated with myelination processes, along with astrocyte morphology, reactivation, and apoptosis (Fig. 6b). A high number of oligodendrocyte function-based pathways were observed in the proteome (8/9 pathways) in which 7 of the pathways have decreased protein expression (Fig. 6b). While the exact mechanisms of how oligodendrocytes contribute to RTT pathogenesis have received little attention, previous studies have implicated an abnormal oligodendrocyte/myelin involvement in the disease [17, 121123]. Altogether, the glial pathways seem to suggest abnormal glial morphology as well as aberrant myelination functions in RTT.

We additionally identified unique pathways associated with inflammation/immunology and blood vessel/vasculature pathways as disrupted in the transcriptome and proteome data sets (Fig. 6c, d, respectively). Within the inflammation/immunology category, 90% (9/10) of the pathways had decreased gene and protein expression (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, 7 immunology/inflammation pathways were found to be shared in common with both the transcriptome and proteome data sets (Fig. 6c, Additional file 10). Indeed, our pathway analysis has identified pathways such as “T cell development”, “abnormal quantity of cytokine”, “recruitment of lymphocytes”, and “activation of lymphocytes” (Fig. 6c), in which disruptions in T cell/T lymphocyte differentiation and cytokine regulation have been documented in RTT [124, 125]. These identified immunology/inflammation pathways highlight a disrupted inflammatory component in RTT, a topic that has received considerable recent attention [124, 125].

Finally, we observed a number of pathways associated with blood cells such as “production of blood cells”, “expansion of blood cells”, “recruitment of blood cells”, and “elimination of blood cells” (Fig. 6d). This is particularly interesting as platelet defects have been observed in RTT patients with FOXG1 mutations [126]. While few studies have examined general vasculature in RTT, defects in vascular function have been previously observed [127]. The above identified pathways suggest a dysregulated function of the vasculature, and perhaps an increased risk of blood-brain barrier breakdown (a pathway also identified in the proteomics data, Fig. 6d), in RTT symptomatic WCX.

Discussion

To provide a more complete understanding of how MeCP2 deficiency contributes to cellular and molecular dysfunction, we performed comparative analyses between global gene and protein expression in Mecp2-deficient mice. Comparing the RNA-Seq data to a publicly available database of cell type-specific gene expression [69], we observed more than 30% of the identified DE genes could be ascribed to specific cell populations. We confirmed previous reports [30, 32] indicating long genes were over-expressed in the neuronal population, a pattern that was also observed in oligodendrocytic cells. In contrast, astrocytic, microglial, and endothelial genes were decreased regardless of gene size. Our proteomics data indicate hundreds of novel protein targets, including proteins involved in proteostasis, metabolism, S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methylation, and an altered stress response. A comparison between RNA-Seq and proteomics data indicates relatively low correlation between the two data sets. However, 35 significant gene-protein target hits were found common to both data sets. Together, these data may serve as a resource for those interested in cellular dysfunction in Rett syndrome.

Why the proteome?

Much of our understanding of MeCP2 function is derived from transcriptomic studies, with the general assumption that alterations in the transcriptome correlate with proteomic changes. Challenging this central dogma, recent studies indicate that RNA-protein expression correlations are low even when comparing the same tissue samples [8891]. There are a number of reasons given for the observed discrepancies, including differences in stability and lifetime of the two types of molecules, posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications, and protein turnover [90, 91]. These changes are likely to be exacerbated in a disease state, particularly a disease such as RTT where data indicates RNA metabolism and proteostasis are disrupted (Table 2). Thus, the primary benefit of performing a direct comparison between transcriptomic and proteomic data is the ability to complement the knowledge gained from each of these omics technologies, providing a more holistic understanding of the interplay between gene and protein expression regulation. The benefits of such comparisons are reflected in our pathway analyses, where “neuronal transmission”, “synaptic transmission”, “excitation of neurons”, “morphology of neurons”, and “development of neurons” pathways are unique to the transcriptome data set. Supplementing these transcriptomic pathways, pathways identified using the proteome data indicated “abnormal conduction”, “damage of synapses”, “atrophy of axons”, and “organization of neurofilaments” as disrupted. These findings indicate that evaluating data obtained from multiple omics platforms provide a more complete understanding of disease biology.

While the current study has only examined transcriptomic and proteomic expression changes in symptomatic Mecp2-deficient male mice, we recognize that utilization of a heterozygous female Mecp2-deficient mouse model is more clinically relevant. To date, the majority of transcriptomic and proteomic studies have been performed in male animal models. Therefore, we chose to use symptomatic Mecp2-deficient male mice for comparison with existing data in the RTT field. Future studies should be directed toward understanding proteomic and transcriptomic changes occurring in the same RTT female mouse model and tissue region.

Cell type-specific gene and protein expression

Neurons

MeCP2 is most highly expressed in neurons and loss of MeCP2 contributes to neuronal cell dysfunction [11, 12]. We identified 2 neuronal-enriched hits Dgkg/DGKγ and Zmat4/ZMAT4. Studies have shown loss of DGKγ is associated with decreased cell density and increased cell soma size [128]. It is possible that upregulation of DGKγ in our data may be compensating for the increased neuronal packing density and decreased soma size observed in RTT [12, 40, 41, 111, 129]. Zmat4 localizes within cerebellar cortical and granule cell layer inhibitory interneurons [130]. UniProtKB biological and molecular gene ontology terms for Zmat4 suggest that it may be involved in DNA/RNA binding [131].

Pathways identified from the transcriptome and proteome data sets relating to neuronal and synaptic transmission, damaged synapses, and abnormal neuronal morphology have been previously described [41, 111]. For example, the “damage of synapse” pathway was identified exclusively in the proteome, in which the proteins PrPC (Prnp) and PLAA (Plaa) were differentially abundant in this pathway. PrPC plays a role in mediating synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation [132]. PLAA is an ubiquitin-binding protein, in which reduced function has led to a disruption in synaptic structure and vesicle recycling in neurons [133]. Additionally, the autism candidate gene Rab11fip5 was upregulated in our proteome data and plays a role in recycling endosome protein trafficking and neurotransmitter release [134]. Defects in these proteins could affect how neurotransmitters like BDNF, a well-known MeCP2 target reduced in RTT [41, 134, 135], get internalized and processed.

Astrocytes

Astrocyte MeCP2 deficiency may contribute to RTT symptoms [14, 15, 18]. Astrocytic mGluR3, a metabotropic receptor known to mediate calcium signals in hippocampal astrocytes [136], was downregulated in our data sets. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1pr1/S1P1), similarly related to calcium signaling in astrocytes, was also downregulated. While astrocytic calcium signaling has not been directly investigated within the astrocyte RTT field, astrocyte dysregulated calcium signaling has been implicated in related disorders such as Huntington’s disease [137] and epilepsy [138].

Previous work has implicated aberrant astrocyte microtubule dynamics [139, 140] and decreased astrocyte morphological complexity [72] in RTT. The significant gene-protein hit Slc9a3r1/NHERF1 is associated with cellular structure/morphology, localizes in the plasma membrane of astrocytes [141, 142], and can transport/anchor G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and ion channels/exchangers to the plasma membrane [143]. We found known protein-binding partners Moesin, Merlin, and PTEN [103, 142, 144], the astrocytic glutamate transporter GLAST [141], and astrocytic-specific GPCRs mGluR3 and S1P1 are disrupted in the proteomic or transcriptomic data sets. It is therefore possible that aberrant changes and interactions between these proteins and NHERF1 could contribute to the observed astrocytic morphological defects in RTT [72].

Finally, pathway analysis of astrocytes confirmed “reactivation of astrocytes” and “morphology of neuroglia” pathways were disrupted. Unlike the vast majority of brain pathological states, our data sets indicated that rather than upregulation of reactive astrocyte markers, markers associated with reactive gliosis (Gfap, Gap43, Vim, HSPB1, and ANXA3) were significantly decreased in the RNA-Seq and proteomics data. This suggests that there is a decrease in astrocytic reactivation in RTT, rather than a typical reactive gliosis as seen in most neurological diseases.

Microglia

While none of our 35 significant gene-protein matches were considered microglial-enriched, we did identify 10 DE genes and 4 altered proteins (Additional file 3). C1qa, Tyrobp, and C1QB (all decreased expression) were identified as differentially expressed in RTT patients and are associated with the C1Q complement cascade [33]. Other genes associated with the C1Q complement cascade were also significantly decreased in our transcriptomic data (Pdgfra and Dcn, Additional file 1). Genetic manipulation of C1Q leads to aberrant pruning by microglia, and excessive engulfment of presynaptic inputs by microglia has been reported in Mecp2-null mice [145]. It is also possible that fewer microglia exist in the RTT brain. This has been suggested by Cronk et al. [146] who found microglia are activated and then lost during RTT disease progression. Because our studies were not carried out during the critical developmental period of synaptic refinement, it is unclear how these changes might contribute to altered synapse numbers reported in the RTT brain [147].

Oligodendrocytes and their progenitors

One of the shared pathways disrupted in the transcriptome and proteome, “abnormal morphology of oligodendrocytes”, relates to abnormal oligodendrocytes. Many significant glial pathways per data set also related to abnormal migration and myelination/demyelination of oligodendrocytes. In support of these findings, we found a number of proteins associated with myelination that were differentially abundant in our proteomics data (Additional files 3 and 6). Nguyen and colleagues identified MBP and PLP disruptions in Mecp2-deficient oligodendrocyte lineage cells [17]. Yet, MeCP2 rescue experiments in oligodendrocytes only partially restored MBP expression while PLP remained abnormally expressed, suggesting other cell types may have a non-cell-autonomous effect on oligodendrocyte lineage cells in RTT [17].

Furthermore, 3 of the 12 novel significant gene-protein hits identified in our data are oligodendrocyte-enriched: Me3/NADP-ME3, Ugt8a/UGT8, and Gfra1/GDNFRα1, in which the former two hits have been implicated in metabolism [94, 97]. Additionally, Ugt8a knockout mice present with tremors and ataxia [148, 149], which are common symptoms reported in RTT [135]. GDNFRα1 is a candidate for Hirschsprung’s disease [150], a congenital disorder resulting in loss of nerve cells within the large intestine, and causes constipation, a common symptom of RTT patients [151, 152]. Additionally, the disease/biological function pathway “Hirschsprung’s disease” was also identified in our transcriptome pathway analyses (Additional file 10).

Endothelial cells

In this study, we identified a novel and previously identified RTT endothelial-enriched hits where the gene and protein were altered: Tfrc/TfR and Myo1b/Myo1b, respectively. TfR is a transferrin receptor localized on the plasma membrane of brain capillary endothelial cells and plays a role in transferrin-bound iron transport across the blood-brain barrier (reviewed in [153]). A mutation in WDR45 has been demonstrated in cases of atypical RTT [154, 155], leading to brain iron accumulation [156]. Additionally, one of the pathways identified in the pathway analysis was “permeability of the blood brain barrier” as well as other blood/vasculature pathways (Additional file 10). A more recent study has found that peripheral blood mononuclear cells have an abnormal cellular morphology as well as altered chemokine and cytokine profiles in RTT patients [125]. Additionally, another group has examined mesenteric vessel resistance in RTT mice and found that decreased levels of nitric oxide contribute to endothelial dysfunction [127].

Conclusions

Overall, we have provided the first comprehensive transcriptome and proteome data set comparison for any RTT model to date, with the goal of providing a more comprehensive view into the biological dysfunction associated with MeCP2 deficiency. Through the integration of these unbiased multi-omics approaches, hundreds of novel genes, proteins, and pathways were identified. Our data indicate that future studies performed in discrete cell populations may provide additional insight into disease biology. By providing this valuable resource, two important types of information are now available for the RTT community: (1) novel gene/protein hits associated with pathways currently under active investigation and (2) new genes, proteins, and pathways that have not been described in RTT and available for open investigation. The reinforcing nature of a combined transcriptomic and proteomic comparison could potentially shed light into future novel therapeutic targets for RTT patients.

Abbreviations

AUC: 

Area under the curve

BCA: 

Bicinchoninic acid

CNS: 

Central nervous system

DE: 

Differentially expressed

DIA: 

Data-independent acquisition

FDR: 

False discovery rate/ q-value

FPKM: 

Fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped

IPA: 

Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis

LC-MS/MS: 

Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

PAcIFIC: 

Precursor acquisition independent from ion count

poly A+: 

Polyadenylate positive

PTM(s): 

Post-translational modification(s)

RNA-Seq: 

RNA sequencing

RTT: 

Rett syndrome

WCX: 

Whole cortex

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Kelsey Patterson for the constructive editorial feedback on this paper. We would also like to thank the UAB Heflin Center for Genomic Science Genomics Core facility for processing and running the RNA-sequencing reactions.

Availability of data and materials

RNA-sequencing data can be accessed through the GEO Series accession number GSE96684. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium [51] via the PRIDE partner repository [52] with the data set identifier PXD006460. All analyzed data during this study are provided in the supplementary information files.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health NINDS (R01HL104101 to MLO) and UAB Civitan Emerging Research Scholar Award (award number 3116072 to NLP). The Genomics Core Laboratory is funded by the UAB Cancer Center Support (CA13148) and Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Core Grant (AI027767).

Authors’ contributions

NLP collected all the samples and did the initial sample preparation for the RNA-sequencing and proteomics. NLP and MLO created the experimental study design and analysis scheme. MRH, KJB, and SAS performed the DIA LC-MS/MS proteomics experiments. MRH and DLF analyzed the proteomics data, and NLP and DKC analyzed the RNA-sequencing data. LMH and NLP performed and analyzed the Western blot experiments, and MRH created the chromatograms for each validated protein. NLP and MLO wrote the paper. MRH, LMH, and DLF provided critical feedback on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

All mouse experimental protocols were followed according to NIH guidelines and approval from the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

MRH owns shares in Vulcan Analytical, LLC. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
(2)
Vulcan Analytical, LLC
(3)
UAB Heflin Center for Genomic Science, Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham
(4)
Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry Facility, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School
(5)
Luxumbra Strategic Research, LLC
(6)
School of Neuroscience, Virginia Polytechnic and State University

References

  1. Percy AK, Lane JB. Rett syndrome: model of neurodevelopmental disorders. J Child Neurol. 2005;20:718–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Amir RE, Van den Veyver IB, Wan M, Tran CQ, Francke U, Zoghbi HY. Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat Genet. 1999;23:185–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuddapah VA, Pillai RB, Shekar KV, Lane JB, Motil KJ, Skinner SA, Tarquinio DC, Glaze DG, McGwin G, Kaufmann WE, et al. Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) mutation type is associated with disease severity in Rett syndrome. J Med Genet. 2014;51:152–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Chahrour M, Jung SY, Shaw C, Zhou X, Wong ST, Qin J, Zoghbi HY. MeCP2, a key contributor to neurological disease, activates and represses transcription. Science. 2008;320:1224–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Yasui DH, Peddada S, Bieda MC, Vallero RO, Hogart A, Nagarajan RP, Thatcher KN, Farnham PJ, Lasalle JM. Integrated epigenomic analyses of neuronal MeCP2 reveal a role for long-range interaction with active genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19416–21.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Horike S, Cai S, Miyano M, Cheng JF, Kohwi-Shigematsu T. Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome. Nat Genet. 2005;37:31–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Young JI, Hong EP, Castle JC, Crespo-Barreto J, Bowman AB, Rose MF, Kang D, Richman R, Johnson JM, Berget S, Zoghbi HY. Regulation of RNA splicing by the methylation-dependent transcriptional repressor methyl-CpG binding protein 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:17551–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghosh RP, Horowitz-Scherer RA, Nikitina T, Shlyakhtenko LS, Woodcock CL. MeCP2 binds cooperatively to its substrate and competes with histone H1 for chromatin binding sites. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:4656–70.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Li R, Dong Q, Yuan X, Zeng X, Gao Y, Chiao C, Li H, Zhao X, Keles S, Wang Z, Chang Q. Misregulation of alternative splicing in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006129.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jung BP, Jugloff DG, Zhang G, Logan R, Brown S, Eubanks JH. The expression of methyl CpG binding factor MeCP2 correlates with cellular differentiation in the developing rat brain and in cultured cells. J Neurobiol. 2003;55:86–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zachariah RM, Olson CO, Ezeonwuka C, Rastegar M. Novel MeCP2 isoform-specific antibody reveals the endogenous MeCP2E1 expression in murine brain, primary neurons and astrocytes. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49763.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kishi N, Macklis JD. MECP2 is progressively expressed in post-migratory neurons and is involved in neuronal maturation rather than cell fate decisions. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004;27:306–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Skene PJ, Illingworth RS, Webb S, Kerr AR, James KD, Turner DJ, Andrews R, Bird AP. Neuronal MeCP2 is expressed at near histone-octamer levels and globally alters the chromatin state. Mol Cell. 2010;37:457–68.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ballas N, Lioy DT, Grunseich C, Mandel G. Non-cell autonomous influence of MeCP2-deficient glia on neuronal dendritic morphology. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:311–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Maezawa I, Swanberg S, Harvey D, LaSalle JM, Jin LW. Rett syndrome astrocytes are abnormal and spread MeCP2 deficiency through gap junctions. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5051–61.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Derecki NC, Cronk JC, Lu Z, Xu E, Abbott SB, Guyenet PG, Kipnis J. Wild-type microglia arrest pathology in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Nature. 2012;484:105–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen MV, Felice CA, Du F, Covey MV, Robinson JK, Mandel G, Ballas N. Oligodendrocyte lineage cells contribute unique features to Rett syndrome neuropathology. J Neurosci. 2013;33:18764–74.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Lioy DT, Garg SK, Monaghan CE, Raber J, Foust KD, Kaspar BK, Hirrlinger PG, Kirchhoff F, Bissonnette JM, Ballas N, Mandel G. A role for glia in the progression of Rett’s syndrome. Nature. 2011;475:497–500.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Colantuoni C, Jeon OH, Hyder K, Chenchik A, Khimani AH, Narayanan V, Hoffman EP, Kaufmann WE, Naidu S, Pevsner J. Gene expression profiling in postmortem Rett syndrome brain: differential gene expression and patient classification. Neurobiol Dis. 2001;8:847–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tudor M, Akbarian S, Chen RZ, Jaenisch R. Transcriptional profiling of a mouse model for Rett syndrome reveals subtle transcriptional changes in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:15536–41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Nuber UA, Kriaucionis S, Roloff TC, Guy J, Selfridge J, Steinhoff C, Schulz R, Lipkowitz B, Ropers HH, Holmes MC, Bird A. Up-regulation of glucocorticoid-regulated genes in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2247–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Peddada S, Yasui DH, LaSalle JM. Inhibitors of differentiation (ID1, ID2, ID3 and ID4) genes are neuronal targets of MeCP2 that are elevated in Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2003–14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Jordan C, Li HH, Kwan HC, Francke U. Cerebellar gene expression profiles of mouse models for Rett syndrome reveal novel MeCP2 targets. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8:36.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Urdinguio RG, Lopez-Serra L, Lopez-Nieva P, Alaminos M, Diaz-Uriarte R, Fernandez AF, Esteller M. Mecp2-null mice provide new neuronal targets for Rett syndrome. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3669.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ben-Shachar S, Chahrour M, Thaller C, Shaw CA, Zoghbi HY. Mouse models of MeCP2 disorders share gene expression changes in the cerebellum and hypothalamus. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:2431–42.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gibson JH, Slobedman B, K NH, Williamson SL, Minchenko D, El-Osta A, Stern JL, Christodoulou J. Downstream targets of methyl CpG binding protein 2 and their abnormal expression in the frontal cortex of the human Rett syndrome brain. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11:53.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Urdinguio RG, Fernandez AF, Lopez-Nieva P, Rossi S, Huertas D, Kulis M, Liu CG, Croce CM, Calin GA, Esteller M. Disrupted microRNA expression caused by Mecp2 loss in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Epigenetics. 2010;5:656–63.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu H, Tao J, Chen PJ, Shahab A, Ge W, Hart RP, Ruan X, Ruan Y, Sun YE. Genome-wide analysis reveals methyl-CpG-binding protein 2-dependent regulation of microRNAs in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:18161–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Petazzi P, Sandoval J, Szczesna K, Jorge OC, Roa L, Sayols S, Gomez A, Huertas D, Esteller M. Dysregulation of the long non-coding RNA transcriptome in a Rett syndrome mouse model. RNA Biol. 2013;10:1197–203.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Sugino K, Hempel CM, Okaty BW, Arnson HA, Kato S, Dani VS, Nelson SB. Cell-type-specific repression by methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 is biased toward long genes. J Neurosci. 2014;34:12877–83.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen L, Chen K, Lavery LA, Baker SA, Shaw CA, Li W, Zoghbi HY. MeCP2 binds to non-CG methylated DNA as neurons mature, influencing transcription and the timing of onset for Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:5509–14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gabel HW, Kinde B, Stroud H, Gilbert CS, Harmin DA, Kastan NR, Hemberg M, Ebert DH, Greenberg ME. Disruption of DNA-methylation-dependent long gene repression in Rett syndrome. Nature. 2015;522:89–93.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin P, Nicholls L, Assareh H, Fang Z, Amos TG, Edwards RJ, Assareh AA, Voineagu I. Transcriptome analysis of human brain tissue identifies reduced expression of complement complex C1Q genes in Rett syndrome. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:427.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Veeraragavan S, Wan YW, Connolly DR, Hamilton SM, Ward CS, Soriano S, Pitcher MR, McGraw CM, Huang SG, Green JR, et al. Loss of MeCP2 in the rat models regression, impaired sociability and transcriptional deficits of Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:3284–302.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Maxwell SS, Pelka GJ, Tam PP, El-Osta A. Chromatin context and ncRNA highlight targets of MeCP2 in brain. RNA Biol. 2013;10:1741–57.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Matarazzo V, Ronnett GV. Temporal and regional differences in the olfactory proteome as a consequence of MeCP2 deficiency. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:7763–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Cortelazzo A, Pietri T, De Felice C, Leoncini S, Guerranti R, Signorini C, Timperio AM, Zolla L, Ciccoli L, Hayek J. Proteomic analysis of the Rett syndrome experimental model mecp2Q63X mutant zebrafish. J Proteome. 2017;154:128–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Cortelazzo A, Guerranti R, De Felice C, Signorini C, Leoncini S, Pecorelli A, Landi C, Bini L, Montomoli B, Sticozzi C, et al. A plasma proteomic approach in Rett syndrome: classical versus preserved speech variant. Mediat Inflamm. 2013;2013:438653.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Cortelazzo A, De Felice C, Guerranti R, Signorini C, Leoncini S, Pecorelli A, Zollo G, Landi C, Valacchi G, Ciccoli L, et al. Subclinical inflammatory status in Rett syndrome. Mediat Inflamm. 2014;2014:480980.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Chen RZ, Akbarian S, Tudor M, Jaenisch R. Deficiency of methyl-CpG binding protein-2 in CNS neurons results in a Rett-like phenotype in mice. Nat Genet. 2001;27:327–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Calfa G, Percy AK, Pozzo-Miller L. Experimental models of Rett syndrome based on Mecp2 dysfunction. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2011;236:3–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu Y, Zhou J, White KP. RNA-seq differential expression studies: more sequence or more replication? Bioinformatics. 2014;30:301–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Afgan E, Baker D, van den Beek M, Blankenberg D, Bouvier D, Cech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Eberhard C, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W3–W10.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Trim Galore! [http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/].
  45. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data [http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/].
  46. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562–78.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg SL. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R36.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:511–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Illumina iGenomes [https://support.illumina.com/sequencing/sequencing_software/igenome.html ].
  50. Panchaud A, Scherl A, Shaffer SA, von Haller PD, Kulasekara HD, Miller SI, Goodlett DR. Precursor acquisition independent from ion count: how to dive deeper into the proteomics ocean. Anal Chem. 2009;81:6481–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Vizcaino JA, Deutsch EW, Wang R, Csordas A, Reisinger F, Rios D, Dianes JA, Sun Z, Farrah T, Bandeira N, et al. ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:223–6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Vizcaino JA, Csordas A, Del-Toro N, Dianes JA, Griss J, Lavidas I, Mayer G, Perez-Riverol Y, Reisinger F, Ternent T, et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D447–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Heaven MR, Funk AJ, Cobbs AL, Haffey WD, Norris JL, McCullumsmith RE, Greis KD. Systematic evaluation of data-independent acquisition for sensitive and reproducible proteomics—a prototype design for a single injection assay. J Mass Spectrom. 2016;51:1–11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Norris JL, Farrow MA, Gutierrez DB, Palmer LD, Muszynski N, Sherrod SD, Pino JC, Allen JL, Spraggins JM, Lubbock AL, et al. Integrated, high-throughput, multiomics platform enables data-driven construction of cellular responses and reveals global drug mechanisms of action. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:1364–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Deng V, Matagne V, Banine F, Frerking M, Ohliger P, Budden S, Pevsner J, Dissen GA, Sherman LS, Ojeda SR. FXYD1 is an MeCP2 target gene overexpressed in the brains of Rett syndrome patients and Mecp2-null mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16:640–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Miyake K, Hirasawa T, Soutome M, Itoh M, Goto Y, Endoh K, Takahashi K, Kudo S, Nakagawa T, Yokoi S, et al. The protocadherins, PCDHB1 and PCDH7, are regulated by MeCP2 in neuronal cells and brain tissues: implication for pathogenesis of Rett syndrome. BMC Neurosci. 2011;12:81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Nadler JJ, Zou F, Huang H, Moy SS, Lauder J, Crawley JN, Threadgill DW, Wright FA, Magnuson TR. Large-scale gene expression differences across brain regions and inbred strains correlate with a behavioral phenotype. Genetics. 2006;174:1229–36.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Kang HJ, Kawasawa YI, Cheng F, Zhu Y, Xu X, Li M, Sousa AM, Pletikos M, Meyer KA, Sedmak G, et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature. 2011;478:483–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Lein ES, Hawrylycz MJ, Ao N, Ayres M, Bensinger A, Bernard A, Boe AF, Boguski MS, Brockway KS, Byrnes EJ, et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature. 2007;445:168–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Sharma K, Schmitt S, Bergner CG, Tyanova S, Kannaiyan N, Manrique-Hoyos N, Kongi K, Cantuti L, Hanisch UK, Philips MA, et al. Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1819–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Oksenberg N, Ahituv N. The role of AUTS2 in neurodevelopment and human evolution. Trends Genet. 2013;29:600–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Liu Y, Zhao D, Dong R, Yang X, Zhang Y, Tammimies K, Uddin M, Scherer SW, Gai Z. De novo exon 1 deletion of AUTS2 gene in a patient with autism spectrum disorder and developmental delay: a case report and a brief literature review. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167:1381–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Leblond CS, Nava C, Polge A, Gauthier J, Huguet G, Lumbroso S, Giuliano F, Stordeur C, Depienne C, Mouzat K, et al. Meta-analysis of SHANK mutations in autism spectrum disorders: a gradient of severity in cognitive impairments. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004580.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. O'Roak BJ, Deriziotis P, Lee C, Vives L, Schwartz JJ, Girirajan S, Karakoc E, Mackenzie AP, Ng SB, Baker C, et al. Exome sequencing in sporadic autism spectrum disorders identifies severe de novo mutations. Nat Genet. 2011;43:585–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Hamdan FF, Daoud H, Rochefort D, Piton A, Gauthier J, Langlois M, Foomani G, Dobrzeniecka S, Krebs MO, Joober R, et al. De novo mutations in FOXP1 in cases with intellectual disability, autism, and language impairment. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87:671–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang P, Lin M, Pedrosa E, Hrabovsky A, Zhang Z, Guo W, Lachman HM, Zheng D. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated heterozygous knockout of the autism gene CHD8 and characterization of its transcriptional networks in neurodevelopment. Mol Autism. 2015;6:55.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. King IF, Yandava CN, Mabb AM, Hsiao JS, Huang HS, Pearson BL, Calabrese JM, Starmer J, Parker JS, Magnuson T, et al. Topoisomerases facilitate transcription of long genes linked to autism. Nature. 2013;501:58–62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Huang HS, Allen JA, Mabb AM, King IF, Miriyala J, Taylor-Blake B, Sciaky N, Dutton JW Jr, Lee HM, Chen X, et al. Topoisomerase inhibitors unsilence the dormant allele of Ube3a in neurons. Nature. 2011;481:185–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang Y, Chen K, Sloan SA, Bennett ML, Scholze AR, O'Keeffe S, Phatnani HP, Guarnieri P, Caneda C, Ruderisch N, et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 2014;34:11929–47.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang Q, Wang YZ, Zhang W, Chen X, Wang J, Chen J, Luo W. Involvement of cold inducible RNA-binding protein in severe hypoxia-induced growth arrest of neural stem cells in vitro. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54:2143–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Ure K, Lu H, Wang W, Ito-Ishida A, Wu Z, He LJ, Sztainberg Y, Chen W, Tang J, Zoghbi HY. Restoration of Mecp2 expression in GABAergic neurons is sufficient to rescue multiple disease features in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. elife. 2016;5:e14198.Google Scholar
  72. Nguyen MV, Du F, Felice CA, Shan X, Nigam A, Mandel G, Robinson JK, Ballas N. MeCP2 is critical for maintaining mature neuronal networks and global brain anatomy during late stages of postnatal brain development and in the mature adult brain. J Neurosci. 2012;32:10021–34.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhao D, Mokhtari R, Pedrosa E, Birnbaum R, Zheng D, Lachman HM. Transcriptome analysis of microglia in a mouse model of Rett syndrome: differential expression of genes associated with microglia/macrophage activation and cellular stress. Mol Autism. 2017;8:17.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Lisowski P, Wieczorek M, Goscik J, Juszczak GR, Stankiewicz AM, Zwierzchowski L, Swiergiel AH. Effects of chronic stress on prefrontal cortex transcriptome in mice displaying different genetic backgrounds. J Mol Neurosci. 2013;50:33–57.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Uzturk BG, Jin SX, Rubin B, Bartolome C, Feig LA. RasGRF1 regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis specifically in early-adolescent female mice. J Endocrinol. 2015;227:1–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Buchovecky CM, Turley SD, Brown HM, Kyle SM, McDonald JG, Liu B, Pieper AA, Huang W, Katz DM, Russell DW, et al. A suppressor screen in Mecp2 mutant mice implicates cholesterol metabolism in Rett syndrome. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1013–20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Sticozzi C, Belmonte G, Pecorelli A, Cervellati F, Leoncini S, Signorini C, Ciccoli L, De Felice C, Hayek J, Valacchi G. Scavenger receptor B1 post-translational modifications in Rett syndrome. FEBS Lett. 2013;587:2199–204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Justice MJ, Buchovecky CM, Kyle SM, Djukic A. A role for metabolism in Rett syndrome pathogenesis: new clinical findings and potential treatment targets. Rare Dis. 2013;1:e27265.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Zoghbi HY, Milstien S, Butler IJ, Smith EO, Kaufman S, Glaze DG, Percy AK. Cerebrospinal fluid biogenic amines and biopterin in Rett syndrome. Ann Neurol. 1989;25:56–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Ehrhart F, Coort SL, Cirillo E, Smeets E, Evelo CT, Curfs LM. Rett syndrome—biological pathways leading from MECP2 to disorder phenotypes. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11:158.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Mato JM, Martinez-Chantar ML, SC L. S-adenosylmethionine metabolism and liver disease. Ann Hepatol. 2013;12:183–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  82. McBreairty LE, Bertolo RF. The dynamics of methionine supply and demand during early development. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41:581–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Mellen M, Ayata P, Dewell S, Kriaucionis S, Heintz N. MeCP2 binds to 5hmC enriched within active genes and accessible chromatin in the nervous system. Cell. 2012;151:1417–30.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Kinde B, DY W, Greenberg ME, Gabel HW. DNA methylation in the gene body influences MeCP2-mediated gene repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:15114–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Kaufmann WE, Stallworth JL, Everman DB, Skinner SA. Neurobiologically-based treatments in Rett syndrome: opportunities and challenges. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2016;4:1043–55.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Dougherty JD, Geschwind DH. Progress in realizing the promise of microarrays in systems neurobiology. Neuron. 2005;45:183–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Sugino K, Hempel CM, Miller MN, Hattox AM, Shapiro P, Wu C, Huang ZJ, Nelson SB. Molecular taxonomy of major neuronal classes in the adult mouse forebrain. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:99–107.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Foss EJ, Radulovic D, Shaffer SA, Ruderfer DM, Bedalov A, Goodlett DR, Kruglyak L. Genetic basis of proteome variation in yeast. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1369–75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Ghazalpour A, Bennett B, Petyuk VA, Orozco L, Hagopian R, Mungrue IN, Farber CR, Sinsheimer J, Kang HM, Furlotte N, et al. Comparative analysis of proteome and transcriptome variation in mouse. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1001393.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Vogel C, Marcotte EM. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:227–32.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Haider S, Pal R. Integrated analysis of transcriptomic and proteomic data. Curr Genomics. 2013;14:91–110.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Fang X, Kaduce TL, Weintraub NL, Harmon S, Teesch LM, Morisseau C, Thompson DA, Hammock BD, Spector AA. Pathways of epoxyeicosatrienoic acid metabolism in endothelial cells. Implications for the vascular effects of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:14867–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Yamaguchi Y, Shirai Y, Matsubara T, Sanse K, Kuriyama M, Oshiro N, Yoshino K, Yonezawa K, Ono Y, Saito N. Phosphorylation and up-regulation of diacylglycerol kinase gamma via its interaction with protein kinase C gamma. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:31627–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Hasan NM, Longacre MJ, Stoker SW, Kendrick MA, MacDonald MJ. Mitochondrial malic enzyme 3 is important for insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2015;29:396–410.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Xu F, Sudo Y, Sanechika S, Yamashita J, Shimaguchi S, Honda S, Sumi-Ichinose C, Mori-Kojima M, Nakata R, Furuta T, et al. Disturbed biopterin and folate metabolism in the Qdpr-deficient mouse. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:3924–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Li XF, Lytton J. An essential role for the K+-dependent Na+/Ca2+-exchanger, NCKX4, in melanocortin-4-receptor-dependent satiety. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:25445–59.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Narayan S, Head SR, Gilmartin TJ, Dean B, Thomas EA. Evidence for disruption of sphingolipid metabolism in schizophrenia. J Neurosci Res. 2009;87:278–88.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Ohgami M, Takahashi N, Yamasaki M, Fukui T. Expression of acetoacetyl-CoA synthetase, a novel cytosolic ketone body-utilizing enzyme, in human brain. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;65:989–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Balogh A, Cadel S, Foulon T, Picart R, Der Garabedian A, Rousselet A, Tougard C, Cohen P. Aminopeptidase B: a processing enzyme secreted and associated with the plasma membrane of rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells. J Cell Sci. 1998;111(Pt 2):161–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Friedman J. Sepiapterin reductase deficiency. In: Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, Bean LJH, Bird TD, Ledbetter N, Mefford HC, RJH S, Stephens K, editors. GeneReviews(R). Seattle: University of Washington; 1993.Google Scholar
  101. Bost F, Diarra-Mehrpour M, Martin JP. Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor proteoglycan family—a group of proteins binding and stabilizing the extracellular matrix. Eur J Biochem. 1998;252:339–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Sun C, Zheng J, Cheng S, Feng D, He J. EBP50 phosphorylation by Cdc2/cyclin B kinase affects actin cytoskeleton reorganization and regulates functions of human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Mol Cells. 2013;36:47–54.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Weinman EJ, Steplock D, Zhang Y, Biswas R, Bloch RJ, Shenolikar S. Cooperativity between the phosphorylation of Thr95 and Ser77 of NHERF-1 in the hormonal regulation of renal phosphate transport. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:25134–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Mullershausen F, Craveiro LM, Shin Y, Cortes-Cros M, Bassilana F, Osinde M, Wishart WL, Guerini D, Thallmair M, Schwab ME, et al. Phosphorylated FTY720 promotes astrocyte migration through sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors. J Neurochem. 2007;102:1151–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Coe H, Michalak M. Calcium binding chaperones of the endoplasmic reticulum. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2009;28 Spec No Focus:F96–F103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Tzingounis AV, Kobayashi M, Takamatsu K, Nicoll RA. Hippocalcin gates the calcium activation of the slow after hyperpolarization in hippocampal pyramidal cells. Neuron. 2007;53:487–93.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Feig LA. Regulation of neuronal function by Ras-GRF exchange factors. Genes Cancer. 2011;2:306–19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Brunton H, Goodarzi AA, Noon AT, Shrikhande A, Hansen RS, Jeggo PA, Shibata A. Analysis of human syndromes with disordered chromatin reveals the impact of heterochromatin on the efficacy of ATM-dependent G2/M checkpoint arrest. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31:4022–35.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Babbio F, Castiglioni I, Cassina C, Gariboldi MB, Pistore C, Magnani E, Badaracco G, Monti E, Bonapace IM. Knock-down of methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) causes alterations in cell proliferation and nuclear lamins expression in mammalian cells. BMC Cell Biol. 2012;13:19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Bergo A, Strollo M, Gai M, Barbiero I, Stefanelli G, Sertic S, Cobolli Gigli C, Di Cunto F, Kilstrup-Nielsen C, Landsberger N. Methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2) localizes at the centrosome and is required for proper mitotic spindle organization. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:3223–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Armstrong DD. Neuropathology of Rett syndrome. J Child Neurol. 2005;20:747–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Chapleau CA, Calfa GD, Lane MC, Albertson AJ, Larimore JL, Kudo S, Armstrong DL, Percy AK, Pozzo-Miller L. Dendritic spine pathologies in hippocampal pyramidal neurons from Rett syndrome brain and after expression of Rett-associated MECP2 mutations. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;35:219–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Villemagne PM, Naidu S, Villemagne VL, Yaster M, Wagner HN Jr, ., Harris JC, Moser HW, Johnston MV, Dannals RF, Wong DF: Brain glucose metabolism in Rett syndrome. Pediatr Neurol 2002, 27:117-122.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  114. Pitcher MR, Ward CS, Arvide EM, Chapleau CA, Pozzo-Miller L, Hoeflich A, Sivaramakrishnan M, Saenger S, Metzger F, Neul JL. Insulinotropic treatments exacerbate metabolic syndrome in mice lacking MeCP2 function. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:2626–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Park MJ, Aja S, Li Q, Degano AL, Penati J, Zhuo J, Roe CR, Ronnett GV. Anaplerotic triheptanoin diet enhances mitochondrial substrate use to remodel the metabolome and improve lifespan, motor function, and sociability in MeCP2-null mice. PLoS One. 2014;9:e109527.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Lekman AY, Hagberg BA, Svennerholm LT. Membrane cerebral lipids in Rett syndrome. Pediatr Neurol. 1991;7:186–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Viola A, Saywell V, Villard L, Cozzone PJ, Lutz NW. Metabolic fingerprints of altered brain growth, osmoregulation and neurotransmission in a Rett syndrome model. PLoS One. 2007;2:e157.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Braun S, Kottwitz D, Nuber UA. Pharmacological interference with the glucocorticoid system influences symptoms and lifespan in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21:1673–80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Segatto M, Trapani L, Di Tunno I, Sticozzi C, Valacchi G, Hayek J, Pallottini V. Cholesterol metabolism is altered in Rett syndrome: a study on plasma and primary cultured fibroblasts derived from patients. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104834.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Lopez AM, Chuang JC, Posey KS, Turley SD. Suppression of brain cholesterol synthesis in male Mecp2-deficient mice is age dependent and not accompanied by a concurrent change in the rate of fatty acid synthesis. Brain Res. 2017;1654:77–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. De Felice C, Signorini C, Durand T, Oger C, Guy A, Bultel-Ponce V, Galano JM, Ciccoli L, Leoncini S, D'Esposito M, et al. F2-dihomo-isoprostanes as potential early biomarkers of lipid oxidative damage in Rett syndrome. J Lipid Res. 2011;52:2287–97.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Takahashi S, Matsumoto N, Okayama A, Suzuki N, Araki A, Okajima K, Tanaka H, Miyamoto A. FOXG1 mutations in Japanese patients with the congenital variant of Rett syndrome. Clin Genet. 2012;82:569–73.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  123. Sharma K, Singh J, Pillai PP, Frost EE. Involvement of MeCP2 in regulation of myelin-related gene expression in cultured rat oligodendrocytes. J Mol Neurosci. 2015;57:176–84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. De Felice C, Leoncini S, Signorini C, Cortelazzo A, Rovero P, Durand T, Ciccoli L, Papini AM, Hayek J. Rett syndrome: an autoimmune disease? Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15:411–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Pecorelli A, Cervellati C, Hayek J, Valacchi G. OxInflammation in Rett syndrome. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;81:246–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Goubau C, Devriendt K, Van der Aa N, Crepel A, Wieczorek D, Kleefstra T, Willemsen MH, Rauch A, Tzschach A, de Ravel T, et al. Platelet defects in congenital variant of Rett syndrome patients with FOXG1 mutations or reduced expression due to a position effect at 14q12. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21:1349–55.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Panighini A, Duranti E, Santini F, Maffei M, Pizzorusso T, Funel N, Taddei S, Bernardini N, Ippolito C, Virdis A, Costa M. Vascular dysfunction in a mouse model of Rett syndrome and effects of curcumin treatment. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64863.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  128. Tu-Sekine B, Raben DM. Regulation and roles of neuronal diacylglycerol kinases: a lipid perspective. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;46:353–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Jentarra GM, Olfers SL, Rice SG, Srivastava N, Homanics GE, Blue M, Naidu S, Narayanan V. Abnormalities of cell packing density and dendritic complexity in the MeCP2 A140V mouse model of Rett syndrome/X-linked mental retardation. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11:19.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  130. Schilling K, Oberdick J. The treasury of the commons: making use of public gene expression resources to better characterize the molecular diversity of inhibitory interneurons in the cerebellar cortex. Cerebellum. 2009;8:477–89.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. The UniProt C. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D158–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Llorens F, Del Rio JA. Unraveling the neuroprotective mechanisms of PrP (C) in excitotoxicity. Prion. 2012;6:245–51.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Hall EA, Nahorski MS, Murray LM, Shaheen R, Perkins E, Dissanayake KN, Kristaryanto Y, Jones RA, Vogt J, Rivagorda M, et al. PLAA mutations cause a lethal infantile epileptic encephalopathy by disrupting ubiquitin-mediated endolysosomal degradation of synaptic proteins. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100:706–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Chapleau CA, Larimore JL, Theibert A, Pozzo-Miller L. Modulation of dendritic spine development and plasticity by BDNF and vesicular trafficking: fundamental roles in neurodevelopmental disorders associated with mental retardation and autism. J Neurodev Disord. 2009;1:185–96.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Chahrour M, Zoghbi HY. The story of Rett syndrome: from clinic to neurobiology. Neuron. 2007;56:422–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Haustein MD, Kracun S, XH L, Shih T, Jackson-Weaver O, Tong X, Xu J, Yang XW, O'Dell TJ, Marvin JS, et al. Conditions and constraints for astrocyte calcium signaling in the hippocampal mossy fiber pathway. Neuron. 2014;82:413–29.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  137. Jiang R, Diaz-Castro B, Looger LL, Khakh BS. Dysfunctional calcium and glutamate signaling in striatal astrocytes from Huntington’s disease model mice. J Neurosci. 2016;36:3453–70.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Carmignoto G, Haydon PG. Astrocyte calcium signaling and epilepsy. Glia. 2012;60:1227–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Nectoux J, Florian C, Delepine C, Bahi-Buisson N, Khelfaoui M, Reibel S, Chelly J, Bienvenu T. Altered microtubule dynamics in Mecp2-deficient astrocytes. J Neurosci Res. 2012;90:990–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Delepine C, Nectoux J, Letourneur F, Baud V, Chelly J, Billuart P, Bienvenu T. Astrocyte transcriptome from the Mecp2(308)-truncated mouse model of Rett syndrome. NeuroMolecular Med. 2015;17:353–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Lee A, Rayfield A, Hryciw DH, Ma TA, Wang D, Pow D, Broer S, Yun C, Poronnik P. Na+-H+ exchanger regulatory factor 1 is a PDZ scaffold for the astroglial glutamate transporter GLAST. Glia. 2007;55:119–29.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Molina JR, Morales FC, Hayashi Y, Aldape KD, Georgescu MM. Loss of PTEN binding adapter protein NHERF1 from plasma membrane in glioblastoma contributes to PTEN inactivation. Cancer Res. 2010;70:6697–703.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Chen JY, Lin YY, Jou TS. Phosphorylation of EBP50 negatively regulates beta-PIX-dependent Rac1 activity in anoikis. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19:1027–37.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  144. Takahashi Y, Morales FC, Kreimann EL, Georgescu MM. PTEN tumor suppressor associates with NHERF proteins to attenuate PDGF receptor signaling. EMBO J. 2006;25:910–20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Schafer DP, Heller CT, Gunner G, Heller M, Gordon C, Hammond T, Wolf Y, Jung S, Stevens B. Microglia contribute to circuit defects in Mecp2 null mice independent of microglia-specific loss of Mecp2 expression. elife. 2016;5:e15224.Google Scholar
  146. Cronk JC, Derecki NC, Ji E, Xu Y, Lampano AE, Smirnov I, Baker W, Norris GT, Marin I, Coddington N, et al. Methyl-CpG binding protein 2 regulates microglia and macrophage gene expression in response to inflammatory stimuli. Immunity. 2015;42:679–91.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Chao HT, Zoghbi HY, Rosenmund C. MeCP2 controls excitatory synaptic strength by regulating glutamatergic synapse number. Neuron. 2007;56:58–65.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  148. Bosio A, Binczek E, Stoffel W. Functional breakdown of the lipid bilayer of the myelin membrane in central and peripheral nervous system by disrupted galactocerebroside synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:13280–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  149. Coetzee T, Fujita N, Dupree J, Shi R, Blight A, Suzuki K, Suzuki K, Popko B. Myelination in the absence of galactocerebroside and sulfatide: normal structure with abnormal function and regional instability. Cell. 1996;86:209–19.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Heanue TA, Pachnis V. Expression profiling the developing mammalian enteric nervous system identifies marker and candidate Hirschsprung disease genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:6919–24.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Schwartzman F, Vitolo MR, Schwartzman JS, Morais MB. Eating practices, nutritional status and constipation in patients with Rett syndrome. Arq Gastroenterol. 2008;45:284–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Motil KJ, Caeg E, Barrish JO, Geerts S, Lane JB, Percy AK, Annese F, McNair L, Skinner SA, Lee HS, et al. Gastrointestinal and nutritional problems occur frequently throughout life in girls and women with Rett syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55:292–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Wang J, Pantopoulos K. Regulation of cellular iron metabolism. Biochem J. 2011;434:365–81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  154. Ohba C, Nabatame S, Iijima Y, Nishiyama K, Tsurusaki Y, Nakashima M, Miyake N, Tanaka F, Ozono K, Saitsu H, Matsumoto N. De novo WDR45 mutation in a patient showing clinically Rett syndrome with childhood iron deposition in brain. J Hum Genet. 2014;59:292–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  155. Crisp SJ, Meyer E, Gregory A, Archer H, Hayflick S, Kurian MA, de Silva R. WDR45 mutation in atypical Rett syndrome with brain iron accumulation. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice. 2015;2:81–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Haack TB, Hogarth P, Kruer MC, Gregory A, Wieland T, Schwarzmayr T, Graf E, Sanford L, Meyer E, Kara E, et al. Exome sequencing reveals de novo WDR45 mutations causing a phenotypically distinct, X-linked dominant form of NBIA. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91:1144–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement