Skip to main content

Table 3 Differential item functioning results comparing autistic and general population adults on 9-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale

From: RETRACTED ARTICLE: Improving the measurement of alexithymia in autistic adults: a psychometric investigation and refinement of the twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale

TAS-20 Item # χ2(5) pFDR wABC ESSD Parametersa
1 35.30 < 0.001 0.089 − 0.018 a1, d1, d2
2 23.18 < 0.001 0.164 0.157 d2, d3
3 65.10 < 0.001 0.433b 0.670b d2, d3, d4
9 26.03 < 0.001 0.064 − 0.021 d1
11 30.47 < 0.001 0.165 0.001 a1, d2, d3
12 30.19 < 0.001 0.149 − 0.187 d1
13 57.66 < 0.001 0.064 − 0.022 a1, d1, d2, d3, d4
14 61.90 < 0.001 0.031 − 0.022 a1, d1, d2, d3, d4
  1. Results indicate omnibus Wald tests of differential item functioning using the iterative anchor-selection method of Cao et al. [137]. P values (pFDR) are corrected for a 5% false discovery rate using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. Parameters that were significantly different between groups when tested alone with follow-up Wald tests (pFDR < 0.05) are indicated in the Parameters column
  2. wABC weighted area between curves, ESSD expected score standardized difference (in Cohen’s d metric), a1 slope parameter, d1d4 item intercept parameters (i.e., item “difficulty” parameters)
  3. aParameters in bold are larger (i.e., more discriminating for a parameters and “easier” for d parameters) in the autistic group. Larger values of a indicate that the item is more strongly related to the latent trait in autistic adults, whereas larger values of d indicate that a given item response is endorsed at lower latent trait levels in autistic adults relative to the general population
  4. bPractically significant DIF (i.e., wABC > 0.3)