Skip to main content

Table 3 Parameter estimates for models evaluating group differences in each task

From: Does decreased visual attention to faces underlie difficulties interpreting eye gaze cues in autism?

   b/OR SE t Lower CI Upper CI p
Gaze following task       
Model 1 (main effect on DVs)
 Task performance (group) 0.50 0.13 − 2.71 0.31 0.83 0.01
 Face fixation (group) − 0.19 0.18 − 1.07 − 0.55 0.16 0.29
 Target object fixation (group) − 0.05 0.09 − 0.63 − 0.22 0.11 0.53
Model 2 (fixation predicting accuracy)
 Stimulus fixation 1.19 0.07 3.07 1.07 1.33 0.002
 Stimulus fixation × group 1.02 0.09 0.16 0.84 1.22 0.87
Model 3 (fixation predicting accuracy)
 Face fixation 1.04 0.07 0.54 0.90 1.19 0.58
 Face fixation × group 1.16 0.11 2.25 0.96 1.39 0.12
Model 4 (fixation predicting accuracy)       
 Target object fixation 10.14 2.62 8.96 6.11 16.82 < 0.001
 Target object fixation × group 2.12 1.04 1.53 0.81 5.56 0.13
Gaze perception task       
Model 1 (main effect on DVs)
 Task performance (group) 0.39 0.10 − 3.51 0.23 0.66 < 0.001
 Face fixation (group) − 0.05 0.08 − 0.61 − 0.21 0.11 0.55
 Target object fixation (group) − 0.06 0.04 − 1.35 − 0.15 0.03 0.18
Model 2 (fixation predicting accuracy)
 Stimulus fixation 1.04 0.11 0.33 0.84 1.28 0.74
 Stimulus fixation × group 1.23 0.24 1.07 0.84 1.80 0.27
Model 3 (fixation predicting accuracy)
 Face fixation 0.92 0.10 − 0.71 0.74 1.15 0.48
 Face fixation × group 1.49 0.27 2.2 1.04 2.14 0.03
  TD main effect 0.77 .13 − 1.58 0.55 1.07 0.11
  ASD main effect 1.02 .15 .17 0.77 1.36 0.87
Model 4 (fixation predicting accuracy)       
 Target object fixation 1.95 0.32 4.06 1.41 2.69 < .001
 Target object fixation × group 0.23 0.08 − 4.23 0.12 0.46 < .001
  TD main effect 8.24 2.96 5.87 4.08 16.7 < .001
  ASD main effect 1.1 0.21 0.48 0.76 1.59 0.63
  1. Note. TD is reference group, OR odds ratio, DV dependent variable, CI 95% Confidence Interval