Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of goodness of fit statistics across all tested models

From: Development of the Stanford Social Dimensions Scale: initial validation in autism spectrum disorder and in neurotypicals

Model

χ2 (df)

CFI

TLI

RMSEA (90%CI)

SRMR

AIC

BIC

corBIC

ESEM 1 Factor

1938.848** (798)

.688

.664

. 098** (.092; .103)

.105

15676.690

16119.254

15654.027

ESEM 2 Factors

1494.871** (757)

.798

.771

.081** (.075; .087)

.079

15314.712

15880.712

15285.728

ESEM 3 Factors

1191.583** (717)

.870

.844

.066** (.060; .073)

.058

15091.425

15777.850

15056.274

ESEM 4 Factors

977.231** (678)

.918

.896

.054* (.047; .062)

.046

14955.073

15758.913

14913.909

ESEM 5 Factors

859.313** (640)

.940

.919

.048 (.039; .056)

.038

14913.154

15831.398

14866.131

ESEM 6 Factors

968.449** (679)

.948

.926

.046 (.037; .054)

.036

14921.699

15951.337

14868.972

  1. *< .01
  2. **< .001
  3. AIC Akaike Information Criterion, BIC Bayesian Information Criterion, corBIC Sample size adjusted BIC, ESEM Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, CFI Comparative Fit Index, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Square Residual, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index
Back to article page

Molecular Autism

ISSN: 2040-2392