Fig. 1From: Sex differences in social and emotional insight in youth with and without autismEstimated marginal means of ratings on the four scales by sex and diagnosis. Presented above are data from each of the four insight scales, sex means (boy—gray; and girl—white) and diagnosis means (no autism diagnosis and autism diagnosis) are shown. For the figure above, *p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .005. A Results from an ANOVA show that girls were significantly rated higher on insight measured by the five levels of emotional awareness scale, p = .023. Differences between diagnosis, p = .281 and an interaction between sex and diagnosis, p = .877, were not significant. B Results from an ANOVA show that non-autistic individuals were rated significantly higher than individuals with an autism diagnosis, p = .013. Differences based on sex, p = .058, and an interaction between sex and diagnosis, p = .798, were not significant. Additionally, differences in girls were found p = .046. C Results from an ANOVA show that non-autistic individuals were rated significantly higher than individuals with an autism diagnosis, p = .028, and sex, p = .001. In the non-autistic group, girls were rated significantly higher than boys, p = .025. Similarly, in the autism diagnosis group, girls were rated significantly higher than boys p = .020. Differences in an interaction between sex and diagnosis, p = .587, were not significant. Additionally, differences in girls were found p = .044. D Results from an ANOVA show that non-autistic individuals were rated significantly higher than individuals with an autism diagnosis, p = .040, and sex, p = .004. In the non-autistic group, girls were rated significantly higher than boys, p = .038. Similarly, in the autism diagnosis group, girls were rated significantly higher than boys p = .041. Differences in an interaction between sex and diagnosis, p = .462, were not significantBack to article page