Skip to main content

Table 3 Differential item functioning results comparing autistic and general population adults on 9-item unidimensional model

From: Improving the measurement of alexithymia in autistic adults: a psychometric investigation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and generation of a general alexithymia factor score using item response theory

TAS-20 Item #

χ2(5)

pFDR

wABC

ESSD

Parametersa

1

35.30

< 0.001

0.089

− 0.018

a1, d1, d2

2

23.18

< 0.001

0.164

0.157

d2, d3

3

65.10

< 0.001

0.433b

0.670b

d2, d3, d4

9

26.03

< 0.001

0.064

− 0.021

d1

11

30.47

< 0.001

0.165

0.001

a1, d2, d3

12

30.19

< 0.001

0.149

− 0.187

d1

13

57.66

< 0.001

0.064

− 0.022

a1, d1, d2, d3, d4

14

61.90

< 0.001

0.031

− 0.022

a1, d1, d2, d3, d4

  1. Results indicate omnibus Wald tests of differential item functioning using the iterative anchor-selection method of Cao et al. (2017). P values (pFDR) are corrected for a 5% false discovery rate using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. Parameters that were significantly different between groups when tested alone with follow-up Wald tests (pFDR < 0.05) are indicated in the Parameters column. TAS-20 = 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale; wABC = weighted area between curves; ESSD = expected score standardized difference (in Cohen’s d metric); a1 = slope parameter; d1–d4 = item intercept parameters (i.e., item “difficulty” parameters)
  2. aParameters in bold are larger (i.e., more discriminating for a parameters and “easier” for d parameters) in the autistic group. Larger values of a indicate that the item is more strongly related to the latent trait in autistic adults, whereas larger values of d indicate that a given item response is endorsed at lower latent trait levels in autistic adults relative to the general population
  3. bPractically significant DIF (i.e., wABC > 0.3)