Skip to main content

Table 4 Model fit of confirmatory factor analysis in separate and combined groups (confirmatory sample)

From: Development and validation of the suicidal behaviours questionnaire - autism spectrum conditions in a community sample of autistic, possibly autistic and non-autistic adults

Model

Model

N

Χ2

df

Χ2/df ratio

p

RMSEA

CFI

TLI

Autistic

0

155

35.92

5

7.18

.001

.2

.915

.829

Autistic

1

155

6.4

4

1.6

.171

.062

.993

.983

Possibly autistic

0

113

22.59

5

4.52

.001

.177

.924

.847

Possibly autistic

1

113

2.88

4

.721

.578

.001

1

1.01

Combined autistic/possibly autistic

0

268

52.46

5

10.49

.001

.189

.925

.85

Combined autistic/possibly autistic

1

268

4.36

4

1.09

.359

.018

.999

.999

Non-autistic

0

136

32.34

5

6.47

.001

.201

.927

.853

Non-autistic

1

136

18.32

4

4.58

.001

.163

962

.904

Non-autistic

2

136

2.87

3

.96

.412

.001

1

1.001

  1. Recommended goodness of fit indices values demonstrating good model fit: χ2/df ratio close to zero (Bryant & Yarnold, 1995), RMSEA < 0.06, CFI > 0.95 and TLI > 0.9 (Browne, 2014; Hu & Bentler, 1993). Model 0 indicates baseline models without covaried error terms. Model 1 covaried error terms for items 1 + 5; Model 2 covaried error terms for items 3 + 4, and items 3 + 5 (Fig. 2)