Skip to main content

Table 4 ANCOVA results for differences in SEP responses between tactile reactive and tactile typical groups

From: Tactile cortical responses and association with tactile reactivity in young children on the autism spectrum

  Peak latency Mean amplitude
Contralateral somatosensory ROI
P50 F(1,62) = 1.15, p = 0.289, η2 = 0.018 [0 0.13] F(1,62) = 0.04, p = 0.837, η2 = 0.001 [0 0.06]
N80 F(1,61) = 4.42, p = 0.040*, η2 = 0.068 [0 0.21] F(1,62) = 3.88, p = 0.053*, η2 = 0.059 [0 0.20]
P100 F(1,62) = 3.93, p = 0.052*, η2 = 0.060 [0 0.20] F(1,62) = 5.04, p = 0.028*, η2 = 0.075 [0 0.22]
N140 F(1,61) = 4.52, p = 0.038*, η2 = 0.069 [0 0.21] F(1,61) = 4.18, p = 0.045*, η2 = 0.064 [0 0.20]
P300 F(1,61) = 0.98, p = 0.327, η2 = 0.016 [0 0.12] F(1,62) = 1.42, p = 0.238, η2 = 0.022 [0 0.13]
Frontocentral ROI
P190 F(1,62) = 0.20, p = 0.657, η2 = 0.003 [0 0.08] F(1,62) = 0.95, p = 0.334, η2 = 0.015 [0 0.12]
N300 F(1,62) = 2.91, p = 0.093, η2 = 0.045 [0 0.17] F(1,62) = 1.56, p = 0.217, η2 = 0.024 [0 0.40]
  1. ANCOVA results controlling for age and sex. Effects at p < 0.05 uncorrected that did not survive multiple comparison correction (using FDR) are indicated by *. Effect sizes (η2 ranging between 0 and 1) and their 95% confidence interval (CI in square brackets) are given