Skip to main content
Fig. 6 | Molecular Autism

Fig. 6

From: Combined frequency-tagging EEG and eye-tracking measures provide no support for the “excess mouth/diminished eye attention” hypothesis in autism

Fig. 6

Visualizations of the posterior effects of the eye-tracking data. Black dots show the posterior mean of the conditional effect; horizontal bars and lines denote the 95% posterior credible intervals. An effect is considered significant if 0 does not lie within the 95% credible interval of the posterior difference. The interpretation of the figure is similar to Fig. 4

Back to article page

Molecular Autism

ISSN: 2040-2392