Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical classification performance, comparison of original and Complex Social Geopref tests

From: The geometric preference subtype in ASD: identifying a consistent, early-emerging phenomenon through eye tracking

69% Geo threshold All available subjects
N = 444
All available subjects
N = 227
Screening referred subjects only
N = 122
True positive = ASD only Original GeoPref test (2016) Complex Social GeoPref test Complex Social GeoPref test
True positive 35 14 10
False negative 117 62 36
False positive 4 4 3
True negative 288 147 73
Sensitivity (%) 23 18 22
Specificity (%) 99 97 96
Positive predictive value (%) 90 78 77
Negative predictivevalue (%) 71 70 67
Area under ROC curve .71 .74 .73