Skip to main content

Table 2 Generalized linear mixed effects regressions predicting average UM and UH relative to total words produced, and UM ratio (UM/(UM + UH))

From: Linguistic camouflage in girls with autism spectrum disorder

  Average UM Average UH UM ratio
  Est. (se) z p Est. (se) z p Est. (se) z p
Intercept −4.33 (0.27) −16.25 < 0.000 −5.98 (.23) −26.51 < 0.000 −0.14 (.13) −1.09 0.28
Age −0.21 (0.16) −1.38 0.17 −0.15 (0.12) −1.21 0.23 0.05 (0.08) −0.58 0.56
GCA 0.08 (0.16) 0.55 0.58 −0.11 (0.12) −0.95 0.34 −0.04 (0.07) 0.53 0.59
Sex −0.50 (0.30) −1.68 0.09 0.82 (0.24) 3.36 < 0.001** −0.46 (0.15) −3.18 0.001**
SCQ 0.08 (0.21) 0.37 0.71 −0.02 (0.16) −0.10 0.92 0.06 (0.11) 0.55 0.58
V Com −0.12 (0.23) −0.53 0.60 0.26 (0.17) 1.47 0.14 −0.08 (0.12) −0.69 0.48
V Soc 0.16 (0.26) 0.62 0.54 −0.69 (0.20) −3.48 < 0.001** 0.29 (0.13) 2.28 0.02*
  1. Predictors associated with greater dependent variable values have positive log-odds (shown as estimate (Est.) with standard error (se) in parentheses). V Com Vineland Communication Domain scores, V Soc Vineland Socialization Domain scores, Sex 0 = girl, 1 = boy. * p<.05, ** p<.01